Benefits of Cutting Balloon before Stenting

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 624-628

  Rizik, David G ^a   Popma, Jeffrey P ^b   Leon, Martin B ^c   Mintz, Gary S ^d   Weiner, Bonnie ^e   Cohen, Eric ^f   Lansky, Alexandra J ^d   Adem, Antoine M ^g   Bouhasin, Andre P ⁱ   Wojciechowski, Carol ^g   Weissman, Neil J ^h  

^a HonorHealth and the Scottsdale Lincoln Health Network   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^e University of Massachusetts   (United States)

^f Trinity Medical Center   (United States)

^g Metro Heart Group of St Louis   (United States)

^h WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ NONE

Author keywords

Cutting balloon; Luminal gain

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ATHERECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RESTENOSIS; SAFETY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ATHERECTOMY, CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 10744232970     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kinoshita S, Suzuki T, Hosokawa H, et al. A comparison of initial and long-term results of cutting balloon and POBA in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Jpn Intervent Meeting I-M029.
2. Chevalier B, Royer T, Guyon P, Glatt B. Treatment of in-stent restenosis: Short and midterm results of a pilot randomized study between balloon and cutting balloon. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:62A.
3. Muramatsu T, Tsukahara R, Ho M, et al. Efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis: An intravascular ultrasound evaluation. J Invas Cardiol 2001;13:439-444.
4. Tahara H, Suzuki T, Hosokawa H, et al. The efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis: Comparison with plain old balloon angioplasty. Jpn Circ 1999;5:992.
5. Mizobe M, Oohata K, Osada T. The efficacy of cutting balloon for in-stent restenosis: Compared with conventional balloon angioplasty. Circulation 1999;100(Suppl I):I-308.
6. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:496-501.
7. Serruys PW, DeJaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:489-495.
8. Colombo A, Ferraro M, Itoh A, et al. Results of coronary stenting for restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:830-836.
9. Albiero R, Rau T, Schluter M, et al. Comparison of immediate and intermediate-term results of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in matched lesions. Circulation 1997;96:2997-3005.
10. Moussa I, Di Mario C, Moses J, et al. Does the specific intravascular ultrasound criterion used to optimize stent expansion have an impact on the probability of stent restenosis? Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1012-1017.
11. de Feyter PJ, Kay P, Disco C, Serruys PW. Reference chart derived from post-stent implantation intravascular ultrasound predictors of 6-month expected restenosis on quantitative coronary angiography. Circulation 1999;100:1777-1783.
12. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;3143-149.
13. Kobayashi Y, Moussa I, Akiyama T, et al. Low restenosis rate in lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery with stenting following directional coronary atherectomy. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;45:131-138.
14. Hoffman R, Mintz GS, Kent KM, et al. Comparative early and 9-month results of rotational atherectomy, stents, and the combination of both for calcified lesions in large coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:552-577.
15. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. Standards for the acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies: A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478-1492.
16. Ellis SG, Popma JJ, Buchbinder M, et al. Relation of clinical presentation, stenosis morphology and operator technique to the procedural results of rotational atherectomy and rotational atherectomy-facilitated angioplasty. Circulation 1994;89:882-892.
17. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, et al. Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation 2000;102:523-530.
18. Asada Y, Kisanuki A, Tsuneyoshi A, et al. Effects of inflation pressure of balloon catheter on vascular injuries and subsequent development of intimal hyperplasia in rabbit aorta. Atherosclerosis 1996;121:45-53.
19. Leosco D, Massimo F, Pierli C, et al. Intracoronary serotonin release after high-pressure coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:1317-1322.
20. Stents with high pressure balloon inflations and intravascular utrasonography: Applicable in all patients? Mayo Clinic Proc 199;72:185-187.
21. Rogers C, Tseng DY, Squire JC, Edelman ER. Balloon-artery interactions during stent placement: A finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. Circ Res 1999;84:378-383.
22. Chaitman BR, Jaffe AS. What is the true periprocedure myocardial infarction rate? Does anyone know for sure? The need for clarification. Circulation 1995;91:1609-1610.
23. Klein LW, Kramer BL, Howard E, Lesch M. Incidence and clinical significance of transient creatine kinase elevations and the diagnosis of non-Q wave myocardial infarction associated with coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:621-626.
24. Abdelmeguid AE, Topol EJ, Whitlow PL, et al. Significance of mild transient release of creatine kinase-MB fraction after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation 1996;94:1528-1536.
25. Kong TG, Davidson CJ, Meyers SN, et al. Prognostic implication of creatine kinase elevation following elective coronary artery interventions. JAMA 1997;277:461-466.
26. Detre KD, Holubkov R, Kelsey S, et al., for the Coinvestigators of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1997-1981. N Engl J Med 1988;318:265-270.
27. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, er al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:496-501.
28. Grube E, Silber S, et al. Taxus I: Prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of NIRX ™ stents coated with paclitaxel in a polymer carrier in de novo coronary lesions compared with uncoated controls. Circulation 2001;104:463.
29. Sousa J, Costa M, et al. Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimuseluting stents. Circulation 2001;104:2007.