Effects of different therapies on coronary artery disease

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 116, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1341-1344

  Lu, Shunzheng ^a   Liu, Wenxian ^a   Song, Xiantao ^a   Chen, Yundai ^a   Liu, Hong ^a   Chen, Liying ^a   Lu, Yanling ^a   Chen, Xin ^a   Tian, Rui ^a   Zhang, Jinrong ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Coronary artery hypass graft; Percutanious coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

ANTIANGINA PECTORIS AGENT; CARDIOVASCULAR AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 10744232406     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Pell JP, Walsh D, Norrie J, et al. Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the stent era: a prospective study of all 9890 consecutive patients operated on in Scotland over a two year period. Heart 2001 ;85:662-666.
2. Espinola-Klein C, Rupprecht HJ, Erbel R, et al. Ten-year outcome after coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease and comparison with the results of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Am J Cardiol 2000;85:321-326.
3. Bourassa MG. Clinical trials of coronary revascularization: coronary angioplasty vs. coronary bypass grafting. Curr Opin Cardiol 2000;15:281-286.
4. Mathew V, Berger PB, Lennon RJ, et al. Comparison of percutaneous interventions for unstable angina pectoris in patients with and without previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:931-937.
5. Goy JJ, Kaufmann U, Goy-Eggenberger D, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting to internal mammary artery grafting for proximal, isolated de novo left anterior coronary artery stenosis: the SIMA trial. Stenting vs Internal Mammary Artery. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 1113-1115.
6. Brooks RC, Detre KM. Clinical trials of revascularization therapy in diabetics. Curr Opin Cardiol 2000;15:287-292.
7. Hemingway H, Crook AM, Feder G, et al. Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:645-654.
8. Fitch K, Lazaro P, Aguilar MD, et al. Bernstein SJ. European criteria for the appropriateness and necessity of coronary revascularization procedures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:380-387.
9. Kravitz RL, Laouri M, Kahan JP, et al. Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization. JAMA 1995;274:632-638.
10. Brorsson B, Bernstein SJ, Brook RH, et al. Quality of life of chronic stable angina patients 4 years after coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery. J Intern Med 2001;249:47-57.