Heterotic patterns in hybrids involving cultivar-groups of summer squash, Cucurbita pepo L.

Euphytica

Volumn 135, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 355-360

  López Anido, Fernando ^a   Cravero, Vanina ^a   Asprelli, Pablo ^a   Firpo, Teresa ^a   García, Stella Maris ^a   Cointry, Enrique ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana; Diallel; Genotype and interaction biplot; ssp. pepo

Indexed keywords

CUCURBITA; CUCURBITA PEPO; CUCURBITA PEPO SUBSP. PEPO; CUCURBITA PEPO VAR. MELOPEPO; PEPO;

EID: 10744227220     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000013373.91446.f3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baker, R.J., 1978. Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci 18: 533-536.
2. Bushnell, J.W., 1922. Isolation of uniform types of Hubbard squash by inbreeding. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 19: 139-144.
3. Cress, C.E., 1966. Heterosis of the hybrid related to gene frequency differences between two populations. Genetics 53: 269-274.
4. Cruz, C.C. & R. Vencovsky, 1989. Comparação de alguns métodos de análise dialélica. Revista Brasileira de Genética 12: 425-438.
5. 1 hybrid seed for commercial planting. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 37: 827-828.
6. Decker, D.S., 1988. Origin(s), evolution, and systematics of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Economic Botany 42: 4-15.
7. Dubreuil, P., E. Dufour, E. Krejci, M. Cousse, D. De Vienne, A. Gallais & A. Charcosset, 1996. Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups. Crop Sci 36: 790-799.
8. Elmstrom, G.W., 1978. Evaluation of summer squash varieties for Florida. Proc F1 State Hortic Soc 91: 321-324.
9. FAO, 2002. Production Yearbook for 2001. Vol. 55. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
10. Fehr, W.R., 1987. Principles of Cultivar Development. Vol. 1 Theory and Technique. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.
11. Firpo, I.T., F.S. López Anido, S.M. García & E.L. Cointry, 1998. Heterosis in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 21: 43-45.
12. Griffing, B., 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9: 463-493.
13. Hallauer, A.R. & J.B. Miranda Filho, 1988. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
14. Harrison, K.M., 2002. World trends driving horticulture expansion in emerging economies. Acta Hort 621: 115-125.
15. López Anido, F.S., I.T. Firpo, S.M. García & E.L. Cointry, 1998. Combining ability in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 21: 40-42.
16. Magari, R. & M.S. Kang, 1994. Interactive BASIC program for Griffing's Diallel analysis. J Hered 85: 336.
17. Paris, H.S., 1986. A proposed subspecific classification for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia 61: 133-138.
18. Paris, H.S., 1989. Historical records, origins, and development of the edible cultivar groups of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Economic Botany 43: 423-443.
19. Paris, H.S., 1996. Summer Squash: History, diversity, and distribution. HortTechnology 6: 6-13.
20. Scott, G.W., 1934. Observations on some inbred lines of bush types of Cucurbita pepo. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 32: 480.
21. Stuber, C.W., 1994. Heterosis in plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 12: 227-251.
22. Robinson, R.W. & H.S. Paris, 2000. Cucurbita gene list update. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 23: 137-138.
23. Wehner, T.C., 1999. Heterosis in important US vegetable crops. In: J.G. Coors & S. Pandey (Eds.), The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, pp. 387-397. ASA-CSSA and SSSA Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.
24. Whitaker, T.W. & G.N. Davis, 1962. Cucurbits. Interscience Publishers Inc., New York.
25. Yan, W., 2001. GGEbiplot - a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron J 93: 1111-1118.
26. Yan, W. & A. Hunt, 2002. Biplot analysis of diallel data. Crop Sci 42: 21-30.