Multiple-use forestry vs. forestland-use specialization revisited

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 143-156

  Zhang, Yaoqi ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Canada; China; Forest zoning; Forestland use specialization; Multiple use; New Zealand; USA

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC THRESHOLD; FORESTLAND-USE SPECIALIZATION; MULTIPLE-USE FORESTRY;

COMPOSITION; ECOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; LAND USE; PUBLIC POLICY;

FORESTRY;

ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FORESTRY; LAND USE;

EID: 10644296401     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00028-5     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alberta Pacific Forest Industries Inc., 2001. Poplar Farms. Boyle, AB, Canada
2. Anderson T., Leal D.R. Bureaucracy versus environment. Free Market Environmentalism. 1991;Westview Press, Boulder. Chapter 5
3. Ando A, Camm J., Polasky S., Solow A. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science. 279:1998;2126-2128
4. Binkley C.S. Preserving nature through intensive plantation forestry: the case of forestland allocation with illustrations from British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle. 73:(5):1997;553-559
5. Binkley, C.S., 1999. Forestry in the next millennium: challenges and opportunities for USDA forest service. Discussion Papers 99-15. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
6. Blumm M.C. Public choice theory and the public lands: why 'multiple use' failed. Harvard Environmental Law Review. 18:1994;405-432
7. Booth D.L., Boulter D.W., Neave D.J., Rotherham A.A., Welch D.A. Nature forest landscape management: a strategy for Canada. Forestry Chronicle. 69:1993;141-145
8. Bowes M.D., Krutilla J.V. Multiple Use Management: The Economics of Public Forestland. 1989;Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
9. Clarke M. Devolving forest ownership through privatization in New Zealand. Unasylva. 50:(199):1999;35-43
10. Clawson M. Forests for Whom and for What? 1975;Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
11. Dana S.T. Editorial: multiple use, biology, and economics. Journal of Forestry. 41:1943;625-626
12. Egan A., Raschka J., Waldron K., Bender J. Ecosystem management in the northeast US: A forestry paradigm shift? Journal of Forestry. 97:(10):1999;24-31
13. Evans J. Plantation Forestry in the Tropics. second ed. :1992;Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK
14. Franklin J. Towards a new forestry. American Forestry. 95:1989;37-44
15. Gorte R.W. Multiple use in the national forests: rise and fall or evolution? Journal of Forestry. 97:(10):1999;19-23
16. Gregory, R., 1955. An economic approach to the multiple use. Forest Science 1 (1). Reprinted in Journal of Forest Economics 2 (2): 189-202
17. Gregory, R., 1955. An economic approach to the multiple use. Forest Science 1 (1). Reprinted in Journal of Forest Economics 2 (2): 189-202
18. Haley, D., 1996. Paying the Piper: the Cost of British Columbia's Forest Practice Code. Working Paper. Department of Forest Resources Management. UBC, Vancouver
19. Helfand G.E., Whitney M.D. Efficient multiple-use forestry may require land-use specialization: comment. Land Economics. 70:(3):1994;391-395
20. Hof J.G. Coactive Forest Management. 1993;Academic Press, New York
21. Hyde W.F. Timber Supply, Land Allocation, and Economic Efficiency. 1980;Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
22. Hyde W.F. Compounding clear-cuts: the social failures of public timber management in the Rockies. John B., Stroup R.L. Bureaucracy vs. Environment: The Environmental Costs of Bureaucratic Governance. 1981;University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
23. Laband D.N. The impact of unfunded environmental mandates when environmental quality and timber are produced jointly. European Journal of Law and Economics. 10:(3):2000;199-216
24. LIARC (Low Intensity Area Review Committee), 1995. Low Intensity Areas for the Vancouver Island Region: Exploring a New Resource Management Vision. Victoria, BC, Canada
25. Libecap G.D. Locking up the Range: Federal Land Controls and Grazing. 1981;Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA
26. Luckert, M., Haley, D., 1994. The allowable cut effect as a policy instrument in Canadian forestry. Working Paper 196. Forest Economics and Policy Analysis Unit, UBC Vancouver
27. Maclaren P. Forestry in New Zealand: the opposite of multiple use? Palo M., Uusivuori J., Mery G. World Forests, Markets and Policies. 2001;365-370 Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
28. McArdle R.F. Multiple use - multiple benefits. Journal of Forestry. 51:1953;323-325
29. MoAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry), 2001. A National Exotic Forest Description (as at 1 April 2000), New Zealand
30. MoF (Ministry of Forestry), 1996. National Exotic Forest Description Regional Yield Tables. Ministry of Forestry, Wellington, New Zealand
31. O'Keefe T. Holistic (new) Forestry: significant difference or just another gimmick? Journal of Forestry. 88:(4):1990;23-49
32. Pearson G.A. Multiple use in forestry. Journal of Forestry. 42:1944;243-249
33. Rayner J. Priority-use zoning: sustainable solution or symbolic politics? Tollefson C. The Wealth of Forests. 1998;UBC Press, Vancouver
34. Repetto R. Subsidized timber sales from national forest lands in the United States. Repetto R., Gillis M. Public Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources. 1988;World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
35. Riddell D., Smith M., Street T., Hoffman J. Beyond Timber Targets: A Balanced Vision for Vancouver Island. 1997;Sierra Club of British Columbia, Victoria
36. Sahajananthan, S., 1994. Single and Multiple Use of Forest Lands in British Columbia: The Case of the Reserlstoke Forest District. Nelson, BC, Canada. Ministry of Forests, Nelson Region
37. Salwasser H. Multiple use, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Sample V.A.R., Weyerhaeuser R.J.W., Giltmier T.W. Evolving Toward Sustainable Forestry: Assessing Change in U.S. Forestry Organizations. 1997;201-211 Pinchot Institute for Conservation, Washington, DC
38. Sedjo E.A., Botkin D.C.D. Using forest plantation to spare natural forests. Environments. 39:(10):1997;14-20
39. Sedjo R.A. The Comparative Economics of Plantation Forestry: A Global Assessment. 1983;Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
40. Sedjo R.A. Does the forest service have a future? Regulation. 23:(1):2000;51-55
41. Sedjo R.A. From foraging to cropping: the transition to plantation forestry, and implications for wood supply and demand. Unasylva. 204:2001;24-32
42. Stagner H. A second look at multiple use. American Forests. 66:1960;24-25
43. Stroup R., Baden J. Externality, property rights and the management of our national forests. Journal of Law and Economics. 16:1973;303-311
44. Swallow S., Wear D.N. Spatial interactions in multiple-use forestry and substitution and wealth effects for the single stand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 25:1993;103-120
45. Vincent J., Binkley C. Efficient multiple-use forestry may require land-use specialization. Land Economics. 69:(3):1993;370-376
46. Vincent J., Binkley C. Efficient multiple-use forestry may require land-use specialization: reply. Land Economics. 70:(3):1994;396-397
47. Westoby J. Making green the motherland - Forestry in China. Maxell N. The Chinese Road to Development. 1975;Pergamon Books Ltd
48. Yin R., Sedjo R.A. Is this the age of intensive management? Journal of Forestry. 99:(12):2001;10-17
49. Yong W. Studies on China Forestland Use Specialization Approach. 1992;China's Forestry Publishing Houses Forestry Development, Beijing. in Chinese
50. Zhang Y., Uusivuori J., Kuuluvainen J. Econometric analysis of the causes of forest land use change in Hainan, China. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 30:2000;1913-1921
51. Zhang Y. Institutions in forest management: special reference to China. Palo M., Uusivuori J., Mery G. World Forests, Market and Policy. 2001a;353-364 Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
52. Zhang Y. Economics of transaction costs saving forestry. Ecological Economics. 36:(2):2001b;197-204