Ecosystem Management in the Northeast a Forestry paradigm shift?

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 97, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 24-30

  Egan, Andrew F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033403706     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BEHAN, R.W. 1990. Multircsource forest management: A paradigmatic challenge to professional forestr). Journal of Forestry 88(4): 12-18.
2. BROOKS, D.J., and G.E. GRANT. 1992. New approaches to forest management. Jorunal of Forestry 90(1):25-28.
3. BRUNSON, M.W., D.T. YARROT, S.D. ROBERTS, D.C. GUYNN', and M.R. KUHS'S. 1996. Nonindustrial private forest owners and ecosystem management. Journal of'Forestry 94(6):14-21.
4. CAMPBELL, S., and D. KITTREDGE. 1996. Ecosystem-based management on multiple NIPF ownerships. Journal of Forestry 94{2):24-29.
5. CLARK, R., and G. STANKET. 1991. New forestry or new perspectives? The importance of asking the right questions. Forest Perspectives 1(1):9-13.
6. DWVIS, K.P. 1966. Forest management: Regulation and valuation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. DEBELL, D., and R. CURTIS. 1993. Silviculture and new forestry in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Forestry 91(12):25-30.
8. DlLLMAN, D.A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. EGAN, A. 1999. Reducing forest road erosion: Do foresters and logging contracts matter? Journal of Forestry 97(8):36-39.
10. FRANKLIN, J. 1989. Toward a new forestry. American Forests December:37-44.
11. FRANKLIN, J. 1992. Forest stewardship in an ecological age. The Ninth Annual C. E. Famsu'orth Memorial Lecture. Miscellaneous Publication No. 27. Syracuse, NY: SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Faculty of Forestry.
12. HAYS, S.P. 1990. The environmental context of modern forestry. Unpublished.
13. IRLAND, L. 1994. Getting from here to there: Implementing ecosystem management on the ground. Journal of Forestry 92(8):12-17.
14. KERLINGER, F.N. 1979. Behavioral research, a conceptual approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
15. KOLB.T., M. WAGNER, and W. COVINGTON. 1994. Concepts of forest health: Utilitarian and ecosystem perspectives. Journal ofForestry 92(7):10-15.
16. KUHN, T. 1970. Thestructure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
17. LACKEY, R.T. 1998. Ecosystem management: Desperately seeking a paradigm. Journal of Soil and Vater Conservation 53(2):92-94.
18. LARSEN, D.N., and DA GANSNER. 1972. Pennsylvania's private woodland owners. Research Paper NE-219. Radnor, PA: USDA Forest Service.
19. LEARY, R.A. 1985. Interaction theory in forest ecology and management. Dordecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff and W. Junk.
20. MORE, T. 1996. Forestry's fuzzy concepts: An examination of ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry 94(8):19-23.
21. O'KEEFE, T. 1990. Holistic (new) forestry: Significant difference or just another gimmick? Journal of Forestry 88(4):23-24.
22. PHILLIPS, C.G., and J. RVNDOLPH. 1998. Has ecosystem management really changed practices on the national forest? Journal ofForestry%(5)-AO-A5.
23. RWCHKA, J. 1998. Timber harvesting in West Virginia: A statewide study of some effects and landowner attributes. Mister's thesis. West Virginia University.
24. RICKENBACH, M.G., D.B. KITTREDGE, D. DENNIS, and T. STEVENS. 1998. Ecosystem management: Capturing the concept for woodland owners. Journal ofForestry 96(4): 18-24.
25. ROBERTSON, F.D. 1992. Ecosystem management of the national forests and grasslands. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Sen-ice.
26. ROMM, J. 1994. Sustainable forests and sustainable forestry. Journal of Forestry 92(7):35-39.
27. SADVASSER, H. 1994. Ecosystem management: Can it sustain diversity and productivity? Journal of Forestry 92(8):6-10.
28. STAGNER, H. 1960. A second look at multiple use. American Forests 66:24-25.
29. WEISEM, G.L 1983. Forest management as the landowner sees it: An approach to increasing effectiveness of forestry programs. Master's thesis, University of New Hampshire.