Local adaptation in pine needle scale (Chionaspis pinifoliae): Natal and novel host quality as tests for specialization within and among red and scots pine

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 748-755

  Glynn, Carolyn ^a   Herms, Daniel A ^b  

^a THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Deme formation; Host plant resistance; Host specialization; Local adaptation

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; HOST QUALITY; LOCAL ADAPTATION; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION;

CHIONASPIS; CHIONASPIS PINIFOLIAE; DIASPIDIDAE; HOMOPTERA; PINUS RESINOSA; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 10644243549     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.3.748     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alstad, D. N., and K. W. Corbin. 1990. Scale insect allozyme differentiation within and between host trees. Evol. Ecol. 4: 43-56.
2. Beardsley, J. W., Jr., and R. H. Gonzalez. 1975. The biology and ecology of armored scales. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 20: 47-73.
3. Berlocher, S. H., and J. L. Feder. 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 773-815.
4. Brown, C. E. 1958. Dispersal of the pine needle scale, Phenacaspis pinifoliae (Fitch), (Diaspididae: Homoptera). Can. Entomol. 90: 685-690.
5. Cobb, N. S., and T. G. Whitham. 1993. Herbivore deme formation on individual trees: a test case. Oecologia 94: 496-502.
6. Coley, P. D., J. P. Bryant, and F. S. Chapin III. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230: 895-899.
7. Connell, J. H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35: 131-138.
8. Crawley, M. J. 1989. The relative importance of vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores in plant-population dynamics, pp. 45-71. In E. A. Bernays (ed.), Insect-Plant interactions, vol. 1. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
9. Diehl, S. R., and G. L. Bush. 1984. An evolutionary and applied perspective of insect biotypes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29: 471-504.
10. Edmunds, G. F., and D. N. Alstad. 1978. Coevolution in insect herbivores and conifers. Science 199: 941-945.
11. Ehrlich, P. R., and P. H. Raven. 1964. Butterflies on plants: a study of coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
12. Eliason, E. A., and D. G. McCullough. 1997. Survival and fecundity of three insects reared on four varieties of Scotch pine Christmas trees. J. Econ. Entomol. 90: 1598-1608.
13. Futuyma, D. J., and S. C. Peterson. 1985. Genetic variation in the use of resources by insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 30: 217-238.
14. Glynn, C., and S. Larsson. 2000. Rapid host adaptation in a gall midge to a resistant willow genotype. Agric. For. Entomol. 2: 115-121.
15. Gullan, P. J., and M. Kosztarab. 1997. Adaptations in scale insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42: 23-50.
16. Hanks, L. M., and R. F. Denno. 1993a. The role of demic adaptation in colonization and spread of insect populations, pp. 393-411. In K. C. Kim and B. A. McPheron (eds.), Evolution of insects pests: patterns of variation. Wiley, New York.
17. Hanks, L. M., and R. F. Denno. 1993b. Natural enemies and plant water relations influence the distribution of an armored scale insect. Ecology 74: 1081-1091.
18. Hanks, L. M., and R. F. Denno. 1994. Local adaptation in the armored scale insect Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Ecology 75: 2301-2310.
19. Hanks, L. M., and R. F. Denno. 1998. Dispersal and adaptive deme formation in sedentary coccoid insects, pp. 239-262. In S. Mopper and S. Y. Strauss (eds.), Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations. Chapman & Hall, New York.
20. Hellqvist, S. 2001. Biotypes of Dasineura tetensi, differing in ability to gall and develop on black currant genotypes. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 98: 85-94.
21. Herms, D. A. 2002. Effects of fertilization on insect resistance of woody ornamental plants: reassessing an entrenched paradigm. Environ. Entomol. 31: 923-933:
22. Herms, D. A., and W. J. Mattson. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quart. Rev. Biol. 67: 283-335.
23. Jaenike, J. 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21: 243-273.
24. Jermy, T. 1984. Evolution of insect/host plant relationships. Am. Nat. 124: 609-630.
25. Jermy, T. 1993. Evolution of insect-plant relationships: a devil's advocate approach. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 66: 3-12.
26. Karban, R. 1989. Fine-scale adaptation of herbivorous thrips to individual host plants. Nature 340: 60-61.
27. Lindelöw, Å., and C. Björkman. 2001. Insects on lodgepole pine in Sweden: current knowledge and potential risks. For. Ecol. Manage. 141: 107-116.
28. Mattson, U. J., Niemelä, I. Millers, and Y. Inguanzo. 1994. Immigrant phytophagous insects on woody plants in the United States and Canada: an annotated list. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gen. Tech. Report NC-169.
29. McClure, M. S. 1980. Foliar nitrogen: a basis for host suitability for elongate hemlock scale, Fiorinia externa (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Ecology 61: 72-79.
30. McClure, M. S. 1983. Reproduction and adaptation of exotic hemlock scales (Homoptera: Diaspididae) on their new and native hosts. Environ. Entomol. 12: 1811-1815.
31. Miller, D. R., and M. Kosztarab. 1979. Recent advances in the study of scale insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24: 1-27.
32. Mopper, S., M. Beck, D. Simberloff, and P. D. Stiling. 1995. Local adaptation and agents of selection in a mobile insect. Evolution 49: 810-815.
33. Nielsen, D. G., and N. E. Johnson. 1973. Contributions to the life history and dynamics of the pine needle scale, Phenacaspis pinifoliae in central New York. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66: 34-43.
34. Niemelä, P., and W. J. Mattson. 1996. Invasion of North American forests by European phytophagous insects. Bioscience 46: 741-753.
35. Rossiter, M. C. 1996. Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 451-476.
36. Rossiter, M. C. 1998. Assessment of genetic variation in the presence of maternal or paternal effects in herbivorous insects, pp. 113-138. In S. Mopper and S. Y. Strauss (eds.), Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations. Chapman & Hall, New York.
37. SAS Institute 1999. SAS procedures guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
38. Stiling, P., and A. M. Rossi. 1998. Deme formation in a dispersive gall-forming midge, pp. 22-36. In S. Mopper and S. Y. Strauss (eds.), Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations: effects of ecology, life history and behavior. Chapman & Hall, New York.
39. Strauss, S. Y. 1997. Lack of evidence for local adaptation to individual plant clones or site by a mobile specialist herbivore. Oecologia 110: 77-85.
40. Thompson, J. N. 1999. The raw material for coevolution. Oikos 84: 5-16.
41. Tooker, J. F., and L. M. Hanks. 2000. Influence of plant community structure on natural enemies of pine needle scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in urban landscapes. Environ. Entomol. 29: 1305-1311.
42. Unruh, T. R., and R. F. Luck. 1987. Deme formation in scale insects: a test with the pinyon needle scale and a review of other evidence. Ecol. Entomol. 12: 439-449.
43. Via, S. 1990. Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 421-446.
44. Wainhouse, D., and R. S. Howell. 1983. Intraspecific variation in beech scale populations and in susceptibility of their host Fogus sylvatica. Ecol. Entomol. 8: 351-359.
45. Wainhouse, D., I. M. Gate, and D. Lonsdale. 1988. Beech resistance to the beech scale: a variety of defenses, pp. 277-293. In W. J. Mattson, J. Levieux, and C. Bernard-Dagari (eds.), Mechanisms of woody plant defenses against insects: search for pattern. Springer, New York.