Voluntary use of online lecture notes: Correlates of note use and note use as an alternative to class attendance

Computers and Education

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 409-421

  Grabe, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); LEARNING SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; SERVERS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

COLLEGE LEARNING; ONLINE LECTURES; QUESTIONNAIRE;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 10644241624     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2. Blackboard, Inc. (2001). Blackboard 5 [Computer software]. Washington DC: Author.
3. Brown, J., Bennett, J., & Hanna, G. (1981). The Nelson-Denny reading test. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
4. DiVesta, F., & Gray, G. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8-14.
5. Fox, B. J., & Siedow, M. D. (1985). An investigation of the effects of notetaking on college students' recall of signalled and nonsignalled text. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18, 29-36.
6. Grabe, M., & Sigler, E. (2002). Studying online: Evaluation of an online study environment. Computers & Education, 38, 375-383.
7. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284-1295.
8. Harackiewicz, J., Barron, K., Tauer, J., Carter, S., & Elliot, A. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330.
9. Hartley, J. (1983). Notetaking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 36, 13-14.
10. Hartley, J., & Marshall, S. (1974). On notes and note taking. University Quarterly, 28, 225-235.
11. Kiewra, K. A. (1983). The process of review: A levels of processing approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 366-374.
12. Kiewra, K. (1985a). Investigating note taking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23-32.
13. Kiewra, K. (1985b). Students' note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor's notes for review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 378-386.
14. Kiewra, K. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147-172.
15. Kiewra, K., & Benton, S. (1988). The relationship between information-processing ability and note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 33-44.
16. Kiewra, K., DuBois, N., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.
17. Kiewra, K., DuBois, N., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240-245.
18. Knight, L., & McKelvie, S. (1986). Effects of attendance, note-taking, and review on memory for a lecture: Encoding vs. external storage functions of notes. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 52-61.
19. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2001). Teaching online: A practical guide. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
20. Locke, E. (1977). An empirical study of lecture note taking among college students. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 93-99.
21. Palkovitz, R., & Lore, R. (1980). Note taking and note review: Why students fail questions based on lecture material. Teaching of Psychology, 7, 159-161.
22. Microsoft Corporation (1998). Microsoft PowerPoint 1998 [Computer software]. Redmond, WA: Author.
23. Rothkopf, R. (1988). Perspectives on study skills training in a realistic instructional economy. In C. Weinstein, E. Goetz, & P. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 275-286). New York: Academic Press.
24. WebCT Educational Technologies (1999). World Wide Web Course Tools (WebCT) [Computer Software]. Vancouver, Canada: Author.