On-line grammatically judgments in French children and adults: A crosslinguistic perspective

Journal of Child Language

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 713-737

  Kail, Michele ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b Lab Cognition et Developpement   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 10444283456     PISSN: 03050009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S030500090400649X     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ammon, M. & Slobin, D. I. (1979). A cross-linguistic study of the processing of causative sentences. Cognition 7, 3-17.
2. Amy, G. & Vion, M. (1986). Les indices de traitement des phrases clivées chez l'enfant. Bulletin de Psychologie 39 (Numéro spécial 'Jugement et Langage') 377-86.
3. Arnold, J. E., Novick, J. M., Brown-Schmidt, S., Eisenband, J. G. & Trueswell, J. (2001). Knowing the difference between girls and boys: the use of gender during on-line comprehension in young children. Proceedings of the BU Child Language Conference Boston, MA.
4. Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (eds), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Béchade, H. (1989). Syntaxe du français moderne et contemporain. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
8. Blackwell, A., Bates, E. & Fisher, D. (1996). The time course of grammatically judgement. Language and Cognitive Processes 11, 337-406.
9. Charvillat, A. & Kail, M. (1991). The status of canonical SVO sentences in French: a developmental study of the on-line processing of dislocated sentences. Journal of Child Language 18, 591-608.
10. Clark, E. V. (1978). Awareness of language: some evidence what children say and do. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella & W. Levelt (eds), The child's conception of language. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M. & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: an interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using MacIntosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 25(2), 257-71.
12. Devescovi, A., D'Amico, S. & Gentile, P. (1999). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian: a reaction time study. First Language 19, 129-63.
13. de Villiers, P. A. & de Villiers, J. G. (1972). Early judgments of semantic and syntactic-acceptability by children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1(4), 299-310.
14. de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. (1974). Competence and performance in child language: are children really competent to judge? Journal of Child Language 1(1), 11-22.
15. Friederici, A., Weissenborn, J. & Kail, M. (1991). Pronoun comprehension in aphasia: a comparison of three languages. Brain and Language 41, 289-310.
16. Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H. & Shipley, E. F. (1972). The emergence of the child as grammarian. Cognition 1(2-3), 137-64.
17. Gombert, J. E. (1990). Le développement métalinguistique. Paris: PUF.
18. Hakes, D. T. (1980). The development of metalinguistic abilities in children. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
19. Hurewitz, F., Brown-Schmidt, S., Thorpe, K., Gleitman, L. R. & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(6), 597-626.
20. Kail, M. (1987). The development of sentence interpretation strategies from a crosslinguistic perspective. In C. Pfaff (ed.), First and second language acquisition processes. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
21. Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost, and processing types in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (eds), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kail, M. (1999). Linguistic variations and cognitive constraints in the processing and the acquisition of language. In C. Fuchs & S. Robert (eds), Language diversity and cognitive representations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. Kail, M. & Bassano, D. (1997). Verb agreement processing in french: a study of on-line grammaticality judgments. Language and Speech 40(1), 25-46.
24. Kail, M. & Charvillat, A. (1986). Linguistic cues and processing types in French sentence comprehension. In I. Kurcz, G. W. Shugar & J. H. Danks (eds), Knowledge and language. Amsterdam: North Holland.
25. Kail, M. & Charvillat, A. (1988). Local and topological processing in sentence comprehension by French and Spanish children. Journal of Child Language 15, 637-62.
26. Kail, M. & Diakogiorgi, K. (1994). Morphology and word order in the processing of Greek sentences. In I. Philippaki-Warburton, K. Nicolaidis & M. Safianou (eds), Themes in Greek Linguistics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 117. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
27. Kail, M. & Diakogiorgi, K. (1998). On-line integration of morpho-syntactic cues by Greek children and adults: a crosslinguistic perspective. In N. Dittmar & Z. Penner (eds), Issues in the theory of language acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang.
28. Kempe, V. & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes 14(2), 129-71.
29. Lambert, L. & Kail, M. (2001). Le traitement en temps reel des marques morphologiques d'accord dans les phrases en français. L'Année Psychologique 101(4), 561-92.
30. Li, P., Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: a reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 169-92.
31. MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
32. MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds) (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Mauger, G. (1968). Grammaire pratique du français d'aujourd'hui. Paris: Hachette.
34. Mimica, I., Sullivan, M. & Smith, S. (1994). On-line study of sentence interpretation in native Croatian speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics 15, 237-61.
35. Pratt, C., Tunmer, W. E. & Bowey, J. A. (1984). Children capacity to correct grammatical violations in sentences. Journal of Child Language II, 129-41.
36. Sutter, J. & Johnson, C. (1990). School-age children's metalinguistic awareness of grammaticality in verb form. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33, 84-95.
37. Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E. & Rigault, A.A. (1977). The French speaker's skill with grammatical gender. La Hague: Mouton.
38. Tunmer, W. E. & Grieve, R. (1984). Syntactic awareness in children. In W. E. Tunmer, C. Pratt & M. L. Herrirnan (eds), Metalinguistic awareness in children. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
39. Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M. & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73(2), 89-134.
40. Weissenborn, J., Kail, M. & Friederici, A. (1990). Language particular or language independent factors in acquisition. First Language 10, 141-66.
41. Wulfeck, B. (1993). A reaction time study of grammaticality judgments in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36(6), 1208-15.
42. Wulfeck, B., Bates, E. & Capasso, R. (1991). A crosslinguistic study of grammaticality judgments in Broca's aphasia. Brain & Language 41, 311-36.