Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 129-171

  Kempe, Vera ^a   MacWhinney, Brian ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033420968     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/016909699386329     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Altmann, G.T. (1988). Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 73-97.
2. Altmann, G.T., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191-238.
3. Altmann, G.T., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685-712.
4. Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A crosslinguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341-354.
5. Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245-299.
6. Bock, K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150-171.
7. Cohen, J., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J.L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop-effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
8. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphical system for designing and controlling experiments in the Psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computation, 25, 257-271.
9. Comrie, B., & Corbett, G. (Eds) (1992). The Slavonic Languages. London: Routledge.
10. Corrigan, R. (1986). The internal structure of English transitive sentences. Memory and Cognition, 14, 420-431.
11. Corrigan, R. (1988). Who dun it? The influence of actor-patient animacy and type of verb in the making of causal attributions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 447-465.
12. Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D.C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73-105.
13. Elman, J. (1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-212.
14. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.) Attention and performance XII (pp. 601-681). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
16. Frazier, L. (1989). Against lexical generation of syntax. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.) Lexical Representation and Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Frazier, L., & D'Arcais, G.B.F. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331-344.
18. Frazier, L., & Fodor, J.D. (1978). The sausage-machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-325.
19. Gernsbacher, M.A., Hargreaves, D.J., & Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 735-755.
20. Hernandez, A., Bates, E., & Avila, L. (1994). On-line sentence interpretation in Spanish-English bilinguals: What does it mean to be "in between?". Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 417-446.
21. Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost, and processing types in French sentence comprehension. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Processing (77-117). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kilborn, K. (1989). Sentence processing in a second language: The timing of transfer. Language and Speech, 32, 1-23.
23. Li, P., Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 169-192.
24. MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J. & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
25. MacWhinney, B. (1977). Starting points. Language, 53, 152-168.
26. MacWhinney, B. (1987). Toward a psycholinguistically plausible parser. In S. Thomason (Ed.) Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (pp. 1-8). Ohio State University: Columbus. Ohio.
27. MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (Eds) (1989). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127-150.
30. MacWhinney, B., Pléh, C., & Bates, E. (1985). The development of sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 178-209.
31. McClelland, J.L. (1979). On the time-relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
32. McDonald, J.L. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 317-335.
33. McDonald, J.L., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Maximum likelihood models for sentence processing research. In B. MacWhinney, & E. Bates (Eds), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing (pp. 397-421). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. McDonald, J.L., & MacWhinney, B.J. (1985). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 543-566.
35. Mimica, I., Sullivan, M., & Smith, S. (1994). An on-line study of sentence interpretation in native Croatian speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 237-261.
36. Mitchell, D.C. & Cuetos, F. (1991). The origins of parsing strategies. In C. Smith (Ed.) Current Issues in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1-12). Center of Cognitive Science, University of Austin, Texas.
37. Mitchell, D.C., Cuetos, F., & Zagar, D. (1990). Reading in different languages: Is there a universal mechanism for parsing sentences? In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcais, K. Rayner (Eds.) Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 285-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., & Williams, R. (1986). Learning internal representations by back propagation. In D. Rumelhart, & J. McClelland (Eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition (pp. 318-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
40. Sokolov, J. (1989). The development of role assignment in Hebrew. In B. MacWhinney, & E. Bates (Eds), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing (pp. 118-157). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Taraban, R. & Roark, B. (1996). Competition in learning language-based categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 125-148.
42. Trueswell, J.C. (1996). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 566-585.
43. Trueswell, J.C., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Garnsey, S.M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
44. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1994). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186-215.
45. Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw Hill.
46. Zubin, D. (1979). Discourse function of morphology: The focus system in German. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax (Vol. 12, pp. 469-504). New York: Academic Press.
47. Zubin, D.A. (1977). The semantic basis of case alternation in German. In R.W. Fasold, & R.W. Shuy (Eds), Studies in Language Variation: Semantics, Syntax, Phonology, Pragmatics, Social Situations, Ethnographic Approaches (pp. 88-89). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.