"Capacity" reconsidered: Interindividual differences in language comprehension and individual alpha frequency

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 279-289

  Bornkessel, Ina D ^a   Fiebach, Christian J ^a   Friederici, Angela D ^a   Schlesewsky, Matthias ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; Individual alpha frequency; Individual differences; Language comprehension; Reading span; Verbal working memory capacity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALPHA RHYTHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ALPHA RHYTHM; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 10444229660     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.279     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 121-143.
2. Bornkessel, I., Fiebach, C. J., & Friederici, A. D. (in press). On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: An individual differences approach. Cognitive Brain Research.
3. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77-94.
4. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
5. Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., & Meyer, M. (1998). Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 193-221.
6. Friederici, A. D., Schlesewsky, M., & Fiebach, C. J. (2003). Wh-movement vs. scrambling: The brain makes a difference. In S. Karimi (Ed.), Word Order and Scrambling (pp. 325-344). Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
8. Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: A difficult case for activation theories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 643-657.
9. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169-183.
10. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when: Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
11. Klimesch, W. (1994). The structure of long-term memory: A connectivity model of semantic processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29, 169-195.
13. Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Schimke, H., & Pachinger, T. (1996). Alpha frequency, reaction time, and the speed of processing information. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 13, 511-518.
14. Köpruner, V., Pfurtscheller, G., & Auer, L. (1984). Quantitative EEG in normals and in patients with cerebral isch-emia. In G. Pfurtscheller, E. J. Jonkman, & F. Lopes da Silva (Eds.), Brain Ischemia: Quantitative EEG and Imaging Techniques (pp. 29-50). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Lustig, C., May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 199-207.
16. MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56-98.
17. Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition, 23, 477-494.
18. Sheridan, P. H., Sato, S., Foster, N., Bruno, G., Cox, C., Fedio, P., & Chase, T. N. (1988). Relation of EEG alpha background to parietal lobe function in Alzheimer's disease as measured by positron emission tomography and psychometry. Neurology, 38, 747-750.
19. Surwillo, W (1961). Frequency of the alpha rhythm, reaction time and age. Nature, 191, 823-824.
20. Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Schriefers, H., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic parsing and working memory: The effects of syntactic complexity, reading span, and concurrent load. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 65-103.
21. Vos, S. H., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: The role of working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 111-122.
22. Walenski, M., & Swinney, D. (1999). Sources of variability in correlating syntactic complexity and working memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 112.
23. Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51-79.