Population structure and strong divergent selection shape phenotypic diversification in maize landraces

Heredity

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 95-101

  Pressoir, G ^a,b   Berthaud, J ^a,b  

^a INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Fst; G matrix; Maize landraces; Population structure; Q st; Quantitative traits

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA;

CROP IMPROVEMENT; GENETIC RESOURCE; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GERMPLASM; MAIZE; POPULATION GENETICS;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MAIZE; MEXICO; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS;

AGRICULTURE; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; GENETICS, POPULATION; MEXICO; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VARIATION (GENETICS); ZEA MAYS;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; OAXACA;

EMBRYOPHYTA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 1042301856     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800388     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agrawal AF, Brodie III ED, Rieseberg LH (2001). Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix. Genetica 112-113: 33-43.
2. Barton N, Bengtsson BO (1986). The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations. Heredity 57: 357-376.
3. Bellon MR, Berthaud J, Smale M, Aguirre JA, Taba S, Aragón F et al (2003). Participatory landrace selection for on-farm conservation: an exemple from the central valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Genet Res Crop Evol 50: 401-416.
4. Berthaud J, Clément JC, Emperaire L, Louette D, Pinton F, Sanou J et al (2001). The role of local level gene flow in enhancing and maintaining genetic diversity. In: Cooper HD, Spillane C, Hodgkin T (eds) Broadening the Genetic Base of Crop Production, CABI Publishing in association with FAO and IPGRI: Rome, Italy pp 81-103.
5. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Longman: New York.
6. Felsenstein J (1986). Population differences in quantitative characters and gene frequencies: a comment on papers by Lewontin and Rogers. Am Nat 127: 731-732.
7. Flury B (1988). Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models, J Wiley: New York.
8. Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988). Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, Iowa State University Press: Ames.
9. Lande R (1992). Neutral theory of quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and colonization. Evolution 46: 381-389.
10. Lewis PO, Zaykin D (2002). GDA for Windows, Release 1.1. Departement of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
11. Lewontin RC (1984). Detecting population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. Am Nat 123: 115-124.
12. Louette D, Charrier A, Berthaud J (1997). In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ Bot 51: 20-38.
13. Louette D, Smale M (2000). Farmers' seed selection practices and traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico. Euphytica 113: 25-41.
14. Lynch M, Pfrender M, Spitze K, Lehman N, Allen D, Hicks J et al (1999). The quantitative and molecular genetic architecture of a subdivided species: Daphnia pulex. Evolution 53: 100-110.
15. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits, Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland.
16. Matsuoka Y, Vigouroux Y, Goodman MM, Sanchez GJ, Buckler E, Doebley J (2002). A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 6080-6084.
17. McKay JK, Latta RG (2002). Adaptative population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 285-291.
18. Petit C, Fréville H, Mignot A, Colas B, Riba M, Imbert E et al (2001). Gene flow and local adaptation in two endemic plant species. Biol Conserv 100: 21-34.
19. Phillips PC, Arnold SJ (1999). Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53: 1506-1515.
20. Roff D (2000). The evolution of theG matrix: selection or drift? Heredity 84: 135-142.
21. Roff D (2002). ComparingG matrices: a MANOVA approach. Evolution 56: 1286-1291.
22. Rogers AR (1986). Population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. Am Nat 127: 729-730.
23. Smale M, Aguirre JA, Bellon MR, Mendoza J, Manuel Rosas I (1999). Farmer management of maize diversity in the central valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico: CIMMYT/INIFAP 1998 baseline socioeconomic survey. CIMMYT Economics working paper 99-09. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico, DF.
24. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995). Biometry, WH Freeman and Company: New York.
25. Stockwell CA, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (2003). Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 94-101.
26. Thornsberry JM, Goodman MM, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Nielsen D, Buckler IV ES (2001). Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nat Genet 28: 286-289.
27. Weir BS (1996). Genetic Data Analysis II, Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland.
28. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
29. Wellhausen E, Roberts J, Roberts LM, Hernández E (1952). Races of Maize in Mexico: Their Origin, Characteristics, and Distribution, The Bussey Institution, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.
30. Whitlock MC (1999). Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation. Genet Res 74: 215-221.
31. Wright S (1965). The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regards to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.