Characteristics and temporal variability of large woody debris trapped in a reservoir on the River Rhone (Rhone): Implications for river basin management

River Research and Applications

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 79-97

  Moulin, B ^a,b   Piegay, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

Author keywords

Alps; Channel clearing; Integrated river management; Large woody debris; Wood input; Wood transfer

Indexed keywords

DEBRIS; RESERVOIR; RIVER BASIN; WOOD;

BASIN MANAGEMENT; RESERVOIR; RIVER BASIN; TEMPORAL VARIATION; WOODY DEBRIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; RHONE RIVER; WESTERN EUROPE;

ALNUS; BETULACEAE; CASTOR FIBER; FRAXINUS; POPULUS; RIPARIA;

EID: 1042301781     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.724     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Benke AC, Henry RL, Gillespie DM, Hunter RJ. 1985. Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern streams. Fisheries 10(5): 8-13.
2. Bisson PA, Bilby RE, Bryant MD, Dollof CA, Grette GB, House ML, Murphy ML, Koski KV, Sedell JR. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the pacific northwest: past, present and future. In Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions, Salo EO, Cundy TW (eds). University of Washington: Seattle; 148-190.
3. Boyer M, Piégay H, Roffinoni C, Citterio A, Bourgery C, Caillebotte P. 1998. La gestion des boisements de rivières. SDAGE RMC: Lyon (2 volumes).
4. Braudrick C, Grant GE, Ishikawa Y, Ikeda H. 1997. Dynamics of wood transport in streams: a flume experiment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 22: 669-683.
5. Bravard JP. 1987. Le Rhône du Léman à Lyon. La Manufacture Lyon.
6. Bryant MD. 1983. The role and management of woody debris in west coast salmonid nursery streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3: 322-380.
7. Crispin V, House R, Roberts D. 1993. Changes in instream habitat, large woody debris, and salmon habitat after the restructuring of a coastal Oregon stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13: 96-102.
8. CSP, DDAF des Vosges. 1995. Epicéa commun et cours d'eau, influence de l'lépicéa commun sur la morphologie et la biocénose des cours d'eau vosgiens. Truite Ombre Saumon 170: 4-8.
9. Darby SE,Thorne CR. 1995. Case studies and reviews: fluvial maintenance operations in managed alluvial rivers. Journal of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5: 37-54.
10. Diehl TH. 1997. Potential drift accumulation at bridges. USDT FHT, FHWA-RD-97-028.
11. Gippel CJ, Finlayson BL, O Neill I. 1996a. Distribution and hydraulic significance of large woody debris in a lowland Australian river. Hydrobiologia 318: 179-194.
12. Gippel CL, O Neill I. Finlayson BL, Schnatz I. 1996b. Hydraulic guidelines for the re-introduction and management of large woody debris in lowland rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 223-236.
13. Gurnell AM, Linstead C. 1998. Interactions between large woody debris, hydrological processes and channel morphology in British headwater rivers. In Hydrology in a Changing World, Proceedings of the British Hydrological Society International Conference, Exeter, UK, July 1998.
14. Gurnell AM, Petts GE, Gregory KJ. 1995. The role of coarse woody debris in forest aquatic habitats: implications for management. Journal of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5: 1-24.
15. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkamper GW, et al. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. In Advances in Ecological Research, MacFadyen A, Ford ED (eds). Harcourt Brace: New York; 133-302.
16. Hilderbrand RH, Cemly AD, Dolloff CA, Harpster KL. 1997. Effects of large woody debris placement on stream channels and benthic macroinvertebrate. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 54: 931-939.
17. Iversen TM, Kronvang B, et al. 1993. Re-establishment of Danish stream: restoration and maintenance measures. Journal of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 3: 73-92.
18. Keller EA, Swanson FJ. 1979. Effects of Large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 4: 361-380.
19. Lehtinen RM, Mundahl ND, Madejczyk JC. 1997. Autumn use of woody debris snags by fishes in backwater and channel border habitat of large river. Environmental Biology of Fishes 49: 7-19.
20. Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JD. 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. Freeman and Company: San Francisco.
21. Maser C, Tarrant RF, Trappe JM, Franklin JF. 1988. From the Forest to the Sea: A Story of Fallen Trees. USDA Forest Service: Portland, Oregon.
22. Newson M, Seat D. 1992. River conservation: river dynamics, river maintenance: contradictions? In Proceedings, Conference on Conserving our Landscape: Evolving Landforms and Ice-Age Heritage, Stevens C, Gordon JE, Green CP, Macklin MG (eds). English Nature: Crewe; 125-130.
23. Peiry JL. 1988. Approche géographique de la dynamique spatio-temporelle des sédiments d'un cours d'eau intra-montagnard: l'exemple de la plaine alluviale de l'Arve (Haute-Savoie). PhD thesis, Université Lyon 3, France.
24. Piégay H. 2003. Dynamics of wood in large rivers. In Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers, Gregory SV (ed), American Fisheries Society: Bethesola, MD.
25. Piégay H, Marston RA. 1998. Distribution of coarse woody debris along the concave bank of a meandering river (the Ain river, France). Physical Geography 19(4): 318-340.
26. Piégay H, Landon N, Bravard JP, Clément P, Liébault F. 1997. Channel incision and potentiality of reversibility: the Drôme river case, France. In Management of Landscape Disturbed by Channel Incision, Wang SSY, Langerdoer EJ, Shields FD (eds). Oxford: Mississippi; 1-6.
27. Sedell JR, Frogatt JL. 1984. Importance of streamside forests to large rivers: the isolation of Willamette river, Oregon USA, Verhandlungen Internationalen Vereinigung Limnologie 22: 1828-1834.
28. Sedell JR, Swanson FJ, Gregory SV. 1985. Evaluating fish response to woody debris. In Pacific Northwest Stream Habitat Management Workshop, Hassler TJ (ed.). Humboldt State University: Arcata, CA; 222-245.
29. Shields FD, Nunnaly NR. 1984. Environmental aspect of clearning and snagging. Journal of Environmental Engineering 110(1): 152-165.
30. Shields FD, Smith RH. 1992. Effects of large woody debris removal on physical characteristic of a sand-bed river, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 2: 145-163.
31. Swanson FJ, Lienkaemper GW, Sedell JR. 1976. History, Physical Effects and Management Implications of Large Organic Debris in Western Oregon Streams. USDA Forest Service: Portland, Oregon.
32. Thévenet A. 1998. Intérêt des débris ligneux grossiers pour les processus dans les grands cours d'eau. Pour une prise en compte de la dimension écologique des débris ligneux dans to gestion des cours d'eau. PhD thesis, Université Lyon 1, France.
33. Triska FJ. 1984. Role of wood debris in modifying channel geomorphology and riparian areas of large lowland river under pristine conditions: a historical case study. Verhandlungen Internationalen Vereinigung Limnologie 22: 1876-1892.
34. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 37: 130-137.
35. Venet J. 1986. Identification et classement des bois français. ENGREF: Nancy.
36. Wallace JB, Webster JR, Meyer JL. 1995. Influence of log additions on physical and biotic characteristics of a moutain stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 52: 2120-2137.
37. Wallerstein N. 1999. Impact of LWD on fluvial processes and channel geomorphology in unstable sand-bed rivers. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
38. Zimmerman RC, Goodlett JC, Comer GH. 1967. Influence of vegetation, on channel form of small stream. In Symposium on River Morphology. International Association of Scientific Hydrology: Wallingford; 222-275.