Electronic excitations and tunneling spectra of metallic nanograins

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 24, 2003, Pages

  Narvaez, Gustavo A ^a,b   Kirczenow, George ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; METAL;

ARTICLE; DENSITY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRON; ENERGY; MATERIAL COATING; NANOPARTICLE; SINGLE QUANTUM LEVEL TUNNELING SPECTROSCOPY; SPECTROSCOPY; SPECTRUM; SURFACE CHARGE; THEORY;

EID: 1042288209     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.245415     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. D.C. Ralph, C.T. Black, and M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3241 (1995);
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. D.C. Ralph C.T. Black M. Tinkham 78, 4087 (1997).
3. D. Davidović and M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev. B 61, R16 359 (2000).
4. J.R. Petta and D.C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 266801 (2001);
5. J.R. Petta D.C. Ralph Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 156802 (2002).
6. S. Guéron, M.M. Deshmukh, E.B. Myers, and D.C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4148 (1999);
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. M.M. Deshmukh, S. Kleff, S. Guéron, E. Bonet, A.N. Pasupathy, J. von Delft, and D.C. Ralph, 87, 226801 (2001);
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. M.M. Deshmukh and D.C. Ralph, 89, 266803 (2002).
9. O. Agam, N.S. Wingreen, B.L. Altshuler, D.C. Ralph, and M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1956 (1997).
10. A.H. MacDonald and C.M. Canali, Solid State Commun. 119, 253 (2001);
11. C.M. Canali and A.H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5623 (2000);
12. S. Kleff, J. von Delft, M.M. Deshmukh, and D.C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. B 64, 220401(R) (2001);
13. I.L. Aleiner, P.W. Brouwer, and L.I. Glazman, Phys. Rep. 358, 309 (2002);
14. E. Bonet, M.M. Deshmukh, and D.C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. B 65, 045317 (2002);
15. J. von Delft and D.C. Ralph, Phys. Rep. 345, 61 (2001).
16. G.A. Narvaez and G. Kirczenow, Phys. Rev. B 65, 121403(R) (2002).
17. G.A. Narvaez and G. Kirczenow, Phys. Rev. B 66, 081404(R) (2002).
18. G.A. Narvaez and G. Kirczenow, Phys. Rev. B 67, 195409 (2003).
19. T.A. Brody, J. Flores, J.B. French, P.A. Mello, A. Pandey, and S.S.M. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 385 (1981);
20. K.B. Efetov, Adv. Phys. 32, 53 (1983);
21. W.P. Halperin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 533 (1986);
22. A.D. Mirlin, Phys. Rep. 326, 260 (2000);
23. Y. Alhassid, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 895 (2000).
24. K.K. Likharev, IBM J. Res. Dev. 32, 144 (1988);
25. K.K. Likharev Proc. IEEE 87, 606 (1999);
26. D.V. Averin and K.K. Likharev, in Mesoscopic Phenomena in Solids, edited by B.L. Altshuler, P.A. Lee, and R.A. Webb (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991);
27. G.-L. Ingold and Yu. Nazarov, in Single Charge Tunneling, edited by H. Grabert and M.H. Devoret (Plenum, New York, 1991).
28. This simplification does not change the genesis process of the electronic excitations.
29. Having a finite background charge would lead to the same conclusions we present in this work. It should be noted that small values of the polarization charge have been found in the work reported by D. Davidović and M. Tinkham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1644 (1999) and in Ref. 1.
30. D. Ullmo and H.U. Baranger, Phys. Rev. B 64, 245324 (2001).
31. G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Plenum, New York, 1990).
32. The renormalization of the single-electron energy levels combined with the slow relaxation of excited electrons within the nanograin is the source of complexity of the master (Boltzmann) equation. At a given applied bias voltage V, several configurations that belong to different generations carry the current through the nanograin. As the generations form a hierarchy, the rate equations couple different eh-pair subspaces. Furthermore, these couplings would be different depending on the value of V as different single-electron energy levels posses different individual tunneling in and out rates (see Ref. 8 for a model of these quantities).
33. J.C. Slater and G.F. Koster, Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954).
34. We adopt a Slater-Koster model in which the atomic orbitals on different sites are orthonormal, and consider hopping up to second-nearest neighbors. The Hamiltonian is diagonalized by using a Lanczos algorithm [for an implementation see J. K. Cullum and R. A. Willoughby, Lanczos Algorithms for Large Symmetric Eigenvalue Computations (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1985)].
35. State-of-the-art molecular dynamics suggest that there is an amorphization on the metal-oxide interface rather than crystalline surface reconstructions—see Ref. 23.
36. In this model, the geometry can be arbitrary. However, disks and hemispheres are the most widely assumed geometries in the literature. On the other hand, our choice of a fcc lattice host is consistent with the bulk lattices of most of the metals studied experimentally at present.
37. D.A. Papaconstantopoulos, Handbook of the Band Strucutre of Elemental Solids (Plenum Press, New York, 1986).
38. S.P. McGlynn, L.G. Vanquickenborne, M. Kinoshita, and D.G. Carrol, Introduction to Applied Quantum Chemistry (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1972).
39. T. Campbell, R.K. Kalia, A. Nakano, P. Vashishta, S. Ogata, and S. Rodgers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4866 (1999).
40. W.A. Harrison, Electronic Structure and the Properties of Solids—The Physics of the Chemical Bond (Freeman, San Francisco, 1980).
41. S. Ansell, S. Krishnan, J.K. Richard Weber, J.J. Felten, P.C. Nordine, M.A. Beno, D.L. Price, and M.-L. Sabougni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 464 (1997).
42. Ya.M. Blanter, A.D. Mirlin, and B.A. Muzykantskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2449 (1997).
43. N.W. Ashcroft and D.N. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1976).
44. jα) may be implemented the results derived from this simple model should be qualitatively correct.
45. B.L. Alshuler, Y. Gefen, A. Kamenev, and L.S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2803 (1997).
46. These numbers correspond to typical parameters for the smallest available nanoparticles (see Refs. 1,2,3,4).
47. F changes a few tens of meV when switching from one disorder realization to another.
48. F.
49. F. See Ref. 8 for details.
50. A. Arbouet, C. Voisin, D. Christofilos, P. Langot, N. Del Fatti, F. Vallée, J. Lermé, G. Celep, E. Cottancin, M. Gaudry, M. Pellarin, M. Broyer, M. Maillard, M.P. Pileni, and M. Treguer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 177401 (2003).
51. M.M. Deshmukh, E. Bonet, A.N. Pasupathy, and D.C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. B 65, 073301 (2002). In this paper, the probed grains have typical diameters of about 10 nm which makes it difficult to address the nonequilibrium satellite resonances individually.