Defining the physiologically normal coating and pathological deposit: An analysis of sulfur-containing moieties and pellicle thickness on hydrogel contact lenses

CLAO Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 85-101

  Hart, Dean E ^a,c   Plociniak, Michael P ^b   Grimes, Gary W ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c New York Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LYSOZYME; POLYMACON; POLYMER; SULFUR;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONTACT LENS; DEVICE; HYDROGEL; LACRIMAL FLUID; NOMENCLATURE; NONHUMAN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; WATER CONTENT; X RAY ANALYSIS;

BIOFILMS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; REFERENCE VALUES; SULFUR; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEARS;

EID: 0031958355     PISSN: 07338902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Refojo MF, Holly GJ: Tear protein adsorption on hydrogels: a possible cause of contact !ens allergy. Contact Intraocular Lens Medical Journal 1977;3:23-36.
2. Holly FJ: Basic aspects of contact lens biocompatibility. Colloids and Surfaces 1984;10:343-350.
3. Stedmans Medical Dictionary. 26th edition, (ed) Marjory Spraycar, Baltimore, MD, Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
4. Gristina AG, Naylor PT: In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, et al (eds) Biomaterials Science, Implant-associated infection. 4.7, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, pp 210-211, 1996.
5. Anfinsen CB: On the possibility of predicting tertiary structure from primary sequence. In: Sela M (ed) New perspectives in biology. American Elsevier, pp 42-50, 1964.
6. Maurice DM: Evaporation from the corneal surface: J Physiol 1960;155:49P.
7. Carrington S, Alexander R, Grocott P, et al: The viscous layer overlying the corneal posterior epithelium of the domestic cat. J Anat 1987;153:77-92.
8. Panjwani N, Baum J: Rabbit corneal endothelial cell surface glycoproteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26(4):450-6.
9. Mishima S, Maurice DM: The oily layer of the tear film and evaporation from the cornea! surface. Exp Eye Res 1961;1:46.
10. Holly FJ: Tear film physiology and contact lens wear. I. Pertinent aspects of tear film physiology. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981;58:324.
11. Mishima S, Gasset A, Klyce SD, et al: Determination of tear volume and tear flow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1966;5:264.
12. Doane MG, Gleason WJ: Tear layer mechanics. In: Bennett ES, Weissman BA (eds) Chapter 2, Philadelphia, PA, J.B. Lippincott, 1991.
13. Hart DE: Surface interactions on hydrogel contact lenses: scanning electron microscopy (SEM). J Am Optom Assoc 1987;58:962-974.
14. Hart DE, DePaolis M, Ratner BD, et al: Surface analysis of hydrogel contact lenses by ESCA. CLAO J 1993;19(3):169-173.
15. Stone RP, Mowery-McKee MF, Kreutzer P: Protein: a source of lens discoloration. Contact Lens Forum 1984;9:33-41
16. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM: Surface analysis of biomedical polymers by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infra-red. Biomaterial 1984;5:186.
17. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al: Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. I. Conformational changes of adsorbed human serum albumin. Biomaterial 1984;5:319-325.
18. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al: Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lenses. Biomaterial 1985;6:338-345.
19. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al: Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. Biomaterials 1986;7:9-16.
20. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM: Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. IV. Comparison of in vivo spoilage with the in vitro adsorption of tear proteins. Biomaterials 1986;7:89-96.
21. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, et al: Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362-373.
22. Royce FH, Ratner BD, Horbett TA: Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to poly(methyl methacrylate-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) copolymers. ACS Adv Chem Ser 1982;199:453-462.
23. Mizutani J, Mizutani Y, Ito T: Contact lens deposits. Contact Lens Journal 1988;16(1):3-12.
24. Wedler FC: Analysis of biomaterial deposited on soft contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 1977;11:525-535.
25. Food and Drug Administration. Draft. Premarket notification 510 (k) guidance document for contact lens care products. June 9, 1995 Testing guidelines for class III soft contact lens solutions - call FDA for recent update.
26. Myers RI, Larson DW: Quantity protein deposition on hydrogel contact lenses. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci (Suppl) 1989;30:480.
27. McKee MM, Scott G: Tear lysozyme dimerization occurring on soft contact lenses. Current Eye Research 1996;15:461-466.
28. Franklin V, Horne A, Jones L, et al: Early deposition trends on Group I (polymacon and Tetrafilcon A) and Group III (bufilcon A) materials. CLAO 1991;17(4):244-248.
29. Abbott JM, Bowers RWJ, Franklin VJ, et al: Studies in the ocular compatibility of hydrogels (IV): observations on the role of calcium in deposit formation. J Br Con Lens Assoc 1991;14(1):21-28.
30. Hart DE, Schkolnick J, Wallach D, et al: Contact lens induced giant papillary conjunctivitis: a retrospective study. Journal of the American Optometric Association 1989,60(3):195-204.
31. Hart DE: Deposits and coatings: hydrogel lens\tear interactions. In: Bennett E, Weissman B (eds) Contact Lens Practice. Chapter 33, Philadelphia, PA, JB Lippincott, Co., 1991.
32. Hart DE: Contact lens\tear film interactions: depositions and coatings. In: Dabazies O (ed) The Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists Guide to Basic Science and Clinical Practice. 2nd edition, Chapter 45A, Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Company, 1990.
33. Ratner BD: Surface properties of materials, 1.3. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, et al (eds) Biomaterials Science. San Diego, Academic Press, 1996, pp 21-34.
34. Tomlinson A, Caroline P: Comparative evaluation of surface deposits on high water content hydrogel contact polymers. CLAO J 1990;16:121-127.
35. Fowler SA, Korb DR, Allansmith MR: Deposits on soft contact lenses of various water contents. CLAO J 1985;11:124-127.
36. Van G, Nyquist G, Caldwell KD, et al: Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1804-1813
37. Holden BA, La Hood D, Grant T, et al: Gram-negative bacteria can induce contact lens related acute red eye (CLARE) responses. CLAO J 1996;22(1):47-52.
38. Willcox MDP, Sweeney DF, Sharma S, et al: Culture negative peripheral corneal infiltrates are associated with bacterial contamination of contact lenses. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36(4):S152 (ARVO supplement).
39. Hart DE, Shih K: Surface interactions on extend wear hydrogel contact lenses: microflora and microfauna on lenses in situ. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1987;64(10):739-748.
40. Hart DE, Reindel W, Proskin HM, et al: Microbial contamination of hydrophilic contact lenses: Quantitation and identification of microorganisms associated with contact lenses while on the eye. Optom Vis Sci 1987;70;3:185-191.
41. Hart DE, Hosner M, Georgescu M, et al: A bacterial assay of contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73(3):204-207.
42. Fleiszig S, Efron N: Pathogenesis of contact lens induced bacterial corneal ulcers - a review and a hypotheses. Clin Exp Optom 1988;71:147.
43. Fleiszig, S, Efron N: Microbial flora in eyes of current and former contact lens wearers. J Clin Micro 1992;30(5):1156-1161.
44. Mowrey-McKee MF, Monnat K, Sampson HJ, et al: Microbial contamination of hydrophilic contact lenses, Part I: Quantitation of microbes on patient worn-and-handled lenses just prior to disinfection and their relationship to protein deposits. CLAO J 1992;18:240-244.
45. Mowrey-McKee MF, Sampson HJ, Proskin HM: Microbial contamination of hydrophilic contact lenses, Part II: Quantitation due to patient handling alone and on lenses removed aseptically from the eye. CLAO J 1992;18:87-91.
46. Butrus SI, Klotz SA: Contact lens surface deposits increase the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr Eye Res 1990;9(8):717-724.
47. Aswad MI, John T, Barza M, et al: Bacterial adherence to extended wear soft lenses. Ophthalmol 1990;97(3):296-302.
48. Kirsch LS, Brownstein S: Fungal invasion of seven hydrophilic contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115(4):460-465.
49. Willcox MDP, Power KN, Stapleton F, et al: Potential sources of bacteria that are isolated from contact lenses during wear. Optom and Vis Sci 1997;74:1030-1038.
50. Wilson LA, Sawant AD, Ahearn DG: Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against microbial films in cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109(8):1155-1157.
51. Gray TB, Cursons RT, Sherwan JF, et al: Acanthamoeba, bacterial, and fungal contamination of contact lens storage cases. Brit J Ophthalmol 1995;79(6):601.
52. Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ, Ruben M: The pathology of soft contact lens spoilage. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;87:365-380.
53. Lowther GE, Hilbert JA, King JE: Appearance and location of hydrophilic lens deposits. Int Contact Lens Clin 1975; 2:30-35.
54. Hart DE, Tisdale RR, Sack RA: Composition and origin of lipid deposits on soft contact lenses. Ophthalmol 1986;93:495-503.
55. Hart DE, Lane BC, Josephson JE, et al: Spoilage of hydrogel contact lenses by lipid deposits: tear film potassium depression, fat, protein, and alcohol consumption. Ophthalmol 1987;94(10):1315-1321.
56. Klein AE: Detection of mucin deposits on hydrogel contact lenses: Evaluation of staining procedures and clinical significance. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66(1):56-60.
57. Reidhammer TM: Rust deposits on soft contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1980;7:16.
58. Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ: Lens spoilage. In: Contact Lenses, the CLAO Guide to Basic Science and Clinical Practice. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1984, pp 45.1-45.36.
59. Riley H, Doyle PD, Felty RL: A preliminary study of mercury deposition resulting in spoilage of soft contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1981;8:34.
60. Fowler SA, Greiner JV, Allansmith MR: Soft contact lenses from patients with giant papillary conjunctivitis. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1979;88:1056-1061.
61. Nichols BA, Chiappino ML, Dawson CR: Demonstration of the mucous layer of the tear film by electron microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:464-473.
62. Glantz SA: 1992 Primer of Biostatistics. 3rd edition, New York, McGraw-Hill.
63. Jandel Scientific's sigma-Stat software package for statistics, San Rafeal, CA.
64. Hart DE: Lipid deposits which form on extended wear contact lenses. Int Con Lens Clin 1984;11(6):348-360.
65. Refojo MF, Leong FL: Microscopic determinations of the penetration of proteins and polysaccharides into poly (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and similar hydrogels. J Polymer Sci Polym Symp 1979;66:227-237.
66. Sack AR, Jones BJ, Antignani A, et al: Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:842-849.
67. Lever OW, Groemminger SF, Allen ME, et al: Evaluation of the relationship between total lens protein deposition and patient-rated comfort of hydrophilic (soft) contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1995;22:5-15.
68. Wedler FC, Illman BL, Horensky DS, et al: Analysis of protein and mucin components deposited on hydrophilic contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 1987;70:59-68.
69. Lin S, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, et al: Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991;17:44-50.
70. Benedetto DA, Shah DO, Kaufman HE: The instilled fluid dynamics and surface chemistry of polymers in the preocular tear film. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1975;14:887-902.
71. Bohnert JL, Herbert TA: Changes in adsorbed fibrinogen and albumin interaction with polymers indicated by decreases in detergent elutability. J Colloid Interface Sci 1986;11:363-377.
72. Guillon M, Tighe B, Franklin V: The role of adsorbed vitronectin in the increases of clinical induce inflammatory processes with extended wear. Int Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36(4):S630 (ARVO supplement).
73. Allansmith MR: Pathology and treatment of giant papillary conjunctivitis. I. The U.S. perspective. Clin Therapeutics 1987;9(5):443-450.
74. Greiner JV, Korb DR, Allansmith MR: Pathogenesis of contact lens papillary conjunctivitis. In: O'Conners G, Chandler JW (eds) Proceedings in the Third International Symposium on the Immunology of the Eye. Chapter 73, vol 73, pp 302-304, 1984.
75. Korb DR, Allansmith MR, Greiner JV, et al: Biomicroscopy of papillae associated with hard contact lens wearing. Ophthalmol 1981;88:11.
76. Hart DE, Lieberman G, Lin S, et al: Lipids deposited on gas permeable silicon acrylate lenses American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics Supplement, October 1986, 33P.