Consensus double reading of mammograms in private practice;Konsensuelles zweitbefunden von mammographien in der praxis

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1766-1769

  Pacher, Barbara ^a   Tscherney, R ^a   Litmann Rowenta, B ^a   Liskutin, J ^a   Mazewski, I ^a   Leitner, H ^a   Tscholakoff, D ^a  

^a Radiologie Hernalserspitz   (Austria)

Author keywords

BI RADS classification; Breast cancer screening; Breast ultrasound; Mammography; Quality assurance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DISEASE; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYMPTOM;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONSENSUS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 10344253293     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813723     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Europäische Leitlinien für die Qualitätssicherung in Mammographie-screening. Europäische Kommission. Brüssel, 1996
2. Thurfjell E. Mammography screening. One versus two views and independent ouble reading. Acta Radiol 1994; 35: 345-350
3. Anttinen I, Pamilo M, Soiva M et al. Double reading of mammography screening films - one radiologist or two? Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 584-585
4. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 193: 582
5. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Moss SM. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme. Journal of Medical Screening 1998; 5: 195-201
6. Leivo T, Salminen T, Sintonen H et al. Incremental cost-effectiveness of double-reading mammograms. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999; 54: 261-267
7. Brown J, Bryan S, Warren R. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms. BMJ 1996; 312: 809-812
8. Harvey SC, Geller B, Oppenheimer RG et al. Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1461-1467
9. Warren RM, Duffy SW. Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. Br J Radiol 1995; 68: 958-962
10. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I. Screening. In: Heywang- Köbrunner SH, Schreer (Hrsg). Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik Thieme-Verlag, 2003: 459-468
11. Dronkers DJ, Hendriks JHCL, Robra BP et al. Screening auf Mammakarzinom. In: Dronkers DJ, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R, Rosenbusch G (Hrsg). Radiologische Mammadiagnostik Thieme-Verlag, 1999: 239-254
12. Brancato B, Ciatto D, Bonardi R et al. The assessment of the impact of a double reading by expert readers in a mass mammographic study. Radiol Med 2000; 100: 21-23
13. Ebner H, Hohenauer J, Patera N. Endbericht. Wiener Brustkrebs- Früherkennungsprogramm. Wien, 2002
14. Wimmer-Puchinger B, Guld S, Helbich Th et al. "Die Klügere sieht nach" - Wiener Brustkrebsfrüherkennungsprogramm 2000-2002. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2003; 63: 1073-1075
15. Junkermann H. Workshop: Erfahrungsaustausch Mammographie-Screening- Programm (Wien/Bremen) Wien, 7.6.2004
16. Mammography Quality Control Manual - American College of Radiology (ACR). Reston 1999
17. Ebner H. Brustkrebsfrüherkennung in Wien. 16. Röntgenseminar. Oberlech. 2002
18. EUSOMA European Society of Mastology. Breast Unit Guidelines. Europ Journal of Cancer 2000; 36: 2288-2293
19. Pfarl G, Helbich Th. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) - Deutsche Version. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 921-926
20. Helbich Th, Buchberger W, Rudas M. Austrian Breast Imaging Study Group (ABISG). Osterreichischer Konsensus: stereotaktisch und sono-grafisch gezielte Vakuum-assistierte Brustbiopsien. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 517-522
21. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P et al. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 921-927
22. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL et al. Solid beast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196: 123-134
23. EUSOBI. European Breast Imaging Update 2004. Wien: Workshop ECR, 2004
24. Ciatto S, Del Turco MR, Morrone D et al. Independent double reading of screening mammograms. J Med Screen 1995; 2: 99-101
25. Denton ER, Field S. Just how valuable is double reporting in screening mammography? Clin Radiol 1997; 52: 567
26. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Elmore JG et al. Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation. AJR Am J of Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1257-1262