Organic aerosol growth mechanisms and their climate-forcing implications

Science

Volumn 306, Issue 5703, 2004, Pages 1921-1924

  Maria, Steven F ^a   Russell, Lynn M ^c   Gilles, Mary K ^d   Myneni, Satish C B ^b,d  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTIONS; CLIMATOLOGY; COMBUSTION; COOLING; HYDROPHOBICITY; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

CARBONACEOUS COMPONENTS; GROWTH MECHANISMS; ORGANIC COMPOSITIONS;

AEROSOLS;

CARBON; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AEROSOL; CLIMATE FORCING; GROWTH; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AEROSOL; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMBUSTION; COOLING; HYDROPHOBICITY; MINERAL DUST; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOLATILIZATION; WARMING; WETTABILITY;

EID: 10344243529     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1103491     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A. R. Ravishankara, Science 276, 1058 (1997).
2. V. Ramaswamy et al., Climate Change 2007: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001), pp. 289-416.
3. W. F. Cooke, C. Liousse, H. Cachier, J. Feichter, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 22137 (1999).
4. S. H. Chung, J. H. Seinfeld, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 10.1029/2001JD00397 (2002).
5. E. E. Gard et al., Science 279, 1184 (1998).
6. D. R. Worsnop, J. W. Morris, Q. Shi, P. Davidovits, C. E. Kolb, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 10.1029/2002GL015542 (2002).
7. L. M. Russell, S. F. Maria, S. C. B. Myneni, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 10.1029/2002GL014874 (2002).
8. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
9. The average total carbon-to-total mass absorption ratio for each STXM sample was calibrated to the bulk aerosol organic carbon mass fraction. This calibration is rigorous for 0.2- to 2.0-μm-diameter STXM particle populations with mass average compositions that are equivalent to the submicrometer aerosol mass average measured for each sample.
10. S. F. Maria et al., J. Geophys. Res. 108, 10.1029/2003JD003703 (2003).
11. T. J. Garrett, L. M. Russell, V. Ramaswamy, S. F. Maria, B. J. Huebert, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 10.1029/2002JD002228 (2003).
12. V. H. Grassian, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 20, 467 (2001).
13. K. K. Crahan, D. Hegg, D. S. Covert, H. Jonsson, Atmos. Environ. 38, 3757 (2004).
14. R. J. Charlson et al., Science 292, 2025 (2001).
15. -2 (2). This estimated indirect effect gives an order-of-magnitude calculation by extending a limited set of observations and provides an upper bound on the forcing magnitude (gray region in Fig. 5).
16. T. Novakov, J. E. Penner, Nature 365, 823 (1993).
17. D. Koch, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 20311 (2001).
18. M. Kanakidou, K. Tsigaridis, F. J. Dentener, P. J. Crutzen, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 9243 (2000).
19. W. F. Cooke, V. Ramaswamy, P. Kasibhatla, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 10.1029/2001JD001274 (2002).
20. Support for this research was provided by NSF grant ATM-0408501 and the James S. McDonnell Foundation. The authors thank A. L. D. Kilcoyne and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for usage and support of Advanced Light Source Beamline 5.3.2.