The targeted oral

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 213-214

  Rangachari, P K ^a  

^a Health Sciences Centre Calgary   (Canada)

Author keywords

Active learning; Assessments; Consequential validity

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; EDUCATION; LEARNING; MOUTH EXAMINATION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;

EID: 10344239947     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00030.2004     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 37: 830-837, 2003.
2. Meyer AE. An Educational History of the Western World. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
3. Moss PA. Shifting concepts of validity in educational measurement: implications for performance assessment. Rev Educ Res 62: 229-258, 1992.
4. Muzzin LJ and Hart L. Oral examinations. In: Assessing Clinical Competence, edited by Neufeld VR and Norman GR. New York: Springer, 1985, P71-93.
5. Rangachari PK. Exploring the context of biomedical research through a problem-based course for undergraduate students. Adv Physiol Educ 23: 40-51, 2000.
6. Schuwirth LWT and Van der Vleuten CPM. Changing directions, changing assessment, changing research? Med Educ 38: 805-812, 2004.
7. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, and Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 357: 945-949, 2001.
8. Wass V, Wakeford R, Neighbour R, and Van der Vleuten C. Achieving acceptable reliability in oral examinations: an analysis of the Royal College of General Practitioners membership examination's oral component. Med Educ 37: 126-131, 2003.
9. Spike N and Jolly R. Are orals worth talking about? Med Educ 37: 92-93, 2003.