Will the marketplace see the sustainable forest for the transgenic trees?

The Bioengineered Forest: Challenges for Science and Society

Volumn 9781936331352, Issue , 2004, Pages 112-140

  Doering, Don S ^a  

^a WINROCK INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUSTAINABLE FOREST; TRANSGENIC TREES;

EID: 10344238533     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331352     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Alston, J.M., G. Norton, and P.G. Pardey. 1998. Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research and Priority Setting. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
2. Altieri, M.A., and P. Rosset. 1999. Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, and Institute for Food and Development Policy, Oakland, CA.
3. Arnold, M.B., and R.M. Day. 1998. The Next Bottom Line: Making Sustainable Development Tangible. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
4. BIO (Biotechnology Industry Organization). 2002. Plant-Made Pharmaceuticals. http://www.bio.org/pmp/(accessed January 1, 2003).
5. Carpenter, J.E., and L.P. Gianessi. 2001. Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated Benefit Estimates. Washington, DC: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy.
6. CBI (Council for Biotechnology Information). 2002. Growing More Food: How Biotechnology in a Seed Can Enhance Global Food Security. Washington, DC: Council for Biotechnology Information.
7. Challener, C. 2001. A Changing Landscape for Agrochemicals. Chemical Market Reporter 260(23): 9-12.
8. Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh. 2000. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets:Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). NBER W7552. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
9. Coile, Z. 2002. Bush Speeds Logging Plan. San Francisco Chronicle, Dec. 12, 3.
10. Daar, A.S., D.K. Martin, S. Nast, A.C. Smith, P.A. Singer, and H. Thorsteinsdottir. 2002. Top 10 Biotechnologies for Improving Health in Developing Countries. Toronto:University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics.
11. Doering, D.S., A. Cassara, C. Layke, J. Ranganathan, C. Revenga, D. Tunstall, and W. Vanasselt. 2002. Tomorrow's Markets: Global Trends and Their Implications for Business. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, United Nations Environment Programme, World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
12. Doering, D.S., and R. Parayre. 2000. Identification and Assessment of Emerging Technologies. In Wharton on Managing Emerging Technologies, edited by G.S. Day and P.J.H. Schoemaker. New York: John Wiley, 75-98.
13. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with Forks. Oxford, UK: Capstone Publishing.
14. Enriquez, J., and R.A. Goldberg. 2000. Transforming Life, Transforming Business:The Life-Science Revolution. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 96-104.
15. ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council). 1999. The Politics of GM Food: Risk, Science and Public Trust. Special Briefing No. 5. University of Sussex, UK.
16. EU (European Union). 2002. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/gmo/gmo_index_en.html (accessed December 18, 2002).
17. FAO (UN Food and Agriculture Organization). 2000. Global Forest Resources Assessment. Rome, Italy: FAO.
18. Fenning, T.M., and J. Gershenzon. 2002. Where Will the Wood Come From? Plantation Forests and the Role of Biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology 20: 291-296.
19. Freese, B. 2002. Manufacturing Drugs and Chemicals in Crops: Biopharming Poses New Threats to Consumers, Farmers, Food Companies and the Environment. Washington, DC: Friends of the Earth.
20. Gaskell, G., N. Allum, M. Bauer, J. Durant, A. Allansdottir, H. Bonfadelli, D. Boy, et al. 2000. Biotechnology and the European Public. Nature Biotechnology 18: 935-938.
21. Gereffi, G., R. Garcia-Johnson, and E. Sasser. 2001. The NGO-Industrial Complex. Foreign Policy, July-August, 56-65.
22. Gibbons, M. 1999. Science's New Social Contract with Society. Nature 402(SUPP.):C81-C84.
23. Huang, J., R. Hu, S. Rozelle, F. Qiao, and C.E. Pray. 2002a. Transgenic Varieties and Productivity of Smallholder Cotton Farmers in China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics 46(3): 367-387.
24. Huang, J., C. Pray, and S. Rozell. 2002b. Enhancing Crops to Feed the Poor. Nature 418: 678-684.
25. Juma, C. 1999. Science, Technology and Economic Growth: Africa's Biopolicy Agenda in the 21st Century. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: UNU/INRA Distinguished Annual Lectures.
26. Lenzner, R., and T. Kellner. 2000. Corporate Saboteurs: They Wrecked Monsanto, Now They're after the U.S. Drug Industry. Is Your Company Next? Forbes, November 27, 156-168.
27. Mann, C.C., and M.L. Plummer. 2002. Forest Biotech Edges Out of the Lab. Science 295: 1626-1629.
28. Marra, M.C., P.G. Pardey, and J.M. Alston. 2002. The Payoffs to Agricultural Biotechnology:An Assessment of the Evidence. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
29. Matthews, E., R. Payne, M. Rohweder, and S. Murray. 2000. Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Forest Ecosystems. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
30. Mazzoleni, R., and R.R. Nelson. 1998. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues 32: 1031-1052.
31. Monsanto (Monsanto Corporation). 2002. Our Commitments: Environmental & Social Responsibility: Monsanto Pledge. http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/layout/our_commitments/default.asp (accessed December 31, 2002).
32. Moore, J. 2001. More Than a Food Fight. Issues in Science and Technology 17(4): 31-36.
33. NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service). 2001. Agricultural Prices. http://www.usda.gov/nass/nasshome.htm (accessed March 1, 2002).
34. NCFAP (National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy). 2002. Plant Biotechnology:Current and Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy.
35. NSB (National Science Board). 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators-2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
36. OSU (Oregon State University). 2002. Tree Genetic Engineering Research Cooperative (TGERC). http://www.fsl.orst.edu/tgerc/(accessed December 15, 2002).
37. Owusu, R. 1999. GM Technology in the Forest Sector: A Scoping Study for WWF. Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund.
38. Peña, L., and A. Sequin. 2001. Recent Advances in the Genetic Transformation of Trees. Trends in Biotechnology 19(12): 500-506.
39. Pew (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology). 2002. Environmental Savior or Saboteur:Debating the Impacts of Genetic Engineering. http://pewagbiotech.org/research/survey1-02.pdf (accessed December 18, 2002).
40. Pollack, A. 2002. Spread of Gene-Altered Pharmaceutical Corn Spurs $3 Million Fine. New York Times, Dec. 7.
41. Priest, S.H. 2000. U.S. Public Opinion Divided over Biotechnology? Nature Biotechnology 18(September): 939-942.
42. Regaldo, A. 2000. The Great Gene Grab. Technology Review, September-October, 49-67.
43. Repetto, R., and D. Austin. 2000. Pure Profit: The Financial Implications of Environmental Performance. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
44. Sampson, V., and L. Lohmann. 2000. Briefing 21. Genetic Dialectic: The Biological Politics of Genetically Modified Trees. London, UK: Corner House.
45. Seuss, D. 1971. The Lorax. New York: Random House.
46. Smith, K.R., N. Ballenger, K. Day-Rubenstein, P. Heisey, and C. Klotz-Ingram. 1999. Biotechnology Research: Weighing the Options for a New Public-Private Balance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
47. Specter, M. 2000. The Pharmageddon Riddle. The New Yorker, April 10, 58-71.
48. Tischner, U., and M. Charter. 2001. Sustainable Product Design. Sustainable Solutions:Developing Products and Services for the Future. Trowbridge, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
49. Victor, D.G., and C.F. Runge. 2002. Sustaining a Revolution: A Policy Strategy for Crop Engineering. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
50. Wambugu, F. 1999. Why Africa Needs Agricultural Biotech. Nature 400, July 1. 15-16.
51. Weil, A. 2001. The Future of Transgenic Plants in Developing Countries. Cellular and Molecular Biology 47(8): 1343-51.
52. WRI (World Resources Institute, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme, and World Bank). 2000. World Resources 2000-2001: People and Ecosystems; the Fraying Web of Life. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.