The effects of middle school teachers' beliefs on classroom practices

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 27, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 177-206

  Brighton, Catherine M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Natl Res Ctr Gifted and Talented   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10244266422     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016235320302700205     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241-247.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Beane, J. A. (1993). A middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
4. Berliner, D. (1988). The development of expertise in pedagogy. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298 122)
5. Betts, P., & Frost, L. (2000). Subject knowledge and teacher preparation. Education Canada, 40(1), 38-39.
6. Brighton, C. M., Hertberg, H. L., Moon, T. R., Tomlinson, C. A., & Callahan, C. M. (in press). The feasibility of high-end learning in the diverse middle school. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
7. Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 385-418.
8. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1990). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation
9. Cohen, D. K. (2001). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. In The Josey-Bass reader on school reform (pp. 440-469). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1997). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1980-1990. New York: Longman.
13. Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2000). Teachers' responses to Success for All: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 775-799.
14. Duke, D. L. (1993). Removing barriers to professional growth. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 702-704, 710-712.
15. Elmore, R., Peterson, P., & McCarthey, S. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning and school organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Erickson, H. L. (2002). Concept-based instruction: Teaching beyond the facts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 67-80.
18. Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. New York: Routledge-Falmer.
20. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. London: Falmer.
21. Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10-36.
22. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
23. Gold, B. A. (1999). Punctuated legitimacy: A theory of teacher change. Teachers College Record, 101, 192-219.
24. Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69.
25. Hall, G. E. (1985, April). A stages of concern approach to teacher preparation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
26. Jackson, A. W., & Davis, G. A. (2000). Turning points 2000. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 2-16.
28. Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Innovations for productivity in the American corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.
29. Kaplan, S. N. (1974). Providing programs for the gifted and talented: A handbook. Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.
30. Lipsitz, J. (1984). Successful schools for young adolescents. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
31. Meredith, A. (1995). Terry's learning: Some limitations of Shulman's pedagogical content knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25, 175-187.
32. Moon, T. R., & Callahan, C. M. (2001). Classroom performance assessment: What should it look like in a standards-based classroom? NASSP Bulletin, 85(622), 48-58.
33. National Middle School Association. (1995). This we believe: Developmentally responsive middle schools. Columbus, OH: Author.
34. Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students' learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282-292.
35. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
36. Schwandt, T. A. (1989). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social construc-tivism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Stake, R. E. (1991). The teacher, standardized testing, and prospects of revolution. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 243-247.
38. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
40. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
41. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton, Eds.). New York: Plenum.
43. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
44. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (1998). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America's schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.