-
1
-
-
0034751355
-
NICE gets tooled up
-
Beattie, V. and Hockley, B. (2001), “NICE gets tooled up”, British Journal of Clinical Governance, Vol. 6, pp. 231-2.
-
(2001)
British Journal of Clinical Governance
, vol.6
, pp. 231-232
-
-
Beattie, V.1
Hockley, B.2
-
2
-
-
0037444126
-
The impact of NICE guidance on laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias: analysis of interrupted time series
-
Bloor, K., Freemantle, N., Khadjesari, Z. and Maynard, A. (2003), “The impact of NICE guidance on laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias: analysis of interrupted time series”, BMJ, Vol. 326, p. 578.
-
(2003)
BMJ
, vol.326
, pp. 578
-
-
Bloor, K.1
Freemantle, N.2
Khadjesari, Z.3
Maynard, A.4
-
3
-
-
10244253613
-
Guidelines are less clinical excellence than hindrance
-
Choudhary, R.K. and Hassan, A.M.F. (2003), “Guidelines are less clinical excellence than hindrance”, BMJ, Vol. 326, p. 114.
-
(2003)
BMJ
, vol.326
, pp. 114
-
-
Choudhary, R.K.1
Hassan, A.M.F.2
-
4
-
-
0031217084
-
Limits to healthcare: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers
-
Daniels, N. and Sabin, J. (1997), “Limits to healthcare: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 4, pp. 303-50.
-
(1997)
Philosophy & Public Affairs
, vol.4
, pp. 303-350
-
-
Daniels, N.1
Sabin, J.2
-
5
-
-
0003665913
-
-
The Stationery Office, London.
-
Department of Health (1997), The New NHS: Modern Dependable, The Stationery Office, London.
-
(1997)
The New NHS: Modern Dependable
-
-
-
8
-
-
0037137057
-
The I in the new CHAI
-
Dewar, S. and Finlayson, B. (2002), “The I in the new CHAI”, BMJ, Vol. 325, pp. 848-50.
-
(2002)
BMJ
, vol.325
, pp. 848-850
-
-
Dewar, S.1
Finlayson, B.2
-
9
-
-
0003474302
-
-
Kings Fund Publishing, London.
-
Dunning, M., Abi-Aad, G., Gilbert, D., Gillam, S. and Linnett, H. (1998), Turning Evidence into Everyday Practice, Kings Fund Publishing, London.
-
(1998)
Turning Evidence into Everyday Practice
-
-
Dunning, M.1
Abi-Aad, G.2
Gilbert, D.3
Gillam, S.4
Linnett, H.5
-
10
-
-
0030236860
-
Organisation of asthma care: what difference does it make? A systematic review of the literature
-
Eastwood, A. and Sheldon, T. (1996), “Organisation of asthma care: what difference does it make? A systematic review of the literature”, Quality in Healthcare, Vol. 5, pp. 134-43.
-
(1996)
Quality in Healthcare
, vol.5
, pp. 134-143
-
-
Eastwood, A.1
Sheldon, T.2
-
11
-
-
0033550930
-
Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines
-
Fedder, G., Eccles, M., Grol, R., Griffiths, C. and Grimshaw, J. (1999), “Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines”, BMJ, Vol. 318, pp. 728-30.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.318
, pp. 728-730
-
-
Fedder, G.1
Eccles, M.2
Grol, R.3
Griffiths, C.4
Grimshaw, J.5
-
13
-
-
0034789238
-
Barriers to clinical guidelines: the need for concerted action
-
Foy, R., Walker, A. and Penny, G. (2001), “Barriers to clinical guidelines: the need for concerted action”, British Journal of Clinical Governance, Vol. 6, pp. 166-74.
-
(2001)
British Journal of Clinical Governance
, vol.6
, pp. 166-174
-
-
Foy, R.1
Walker, A.2
Penny, G.3
-
14
-
-
0003883822
-
-
GMC, London.
-
General Medical Council (2001), Good Medical Practice, GMC, London.
-
(2001)
Good Medical Practice
-
-
-
15
-
-
0035403440
-
Going Dutch? How to make clinical guidelines work – an innovative report from Holland
-
Gill, G. (2001), “Going Dutch? How to make clinical guidelines work – an innovative report from Holland”, Clin. Med., Vol. 1, pp. 307-8.
-
(2001)
Clin. Med.
, vol.1
, pp. 307-308
-
-
Gill, G.1
-
16
-
-
0034620233
-
Practice guidelines developed by speciality societies: the need for a critical appraisal
-
Grilli, R. et al., (2000), “Practice guidelines developed by speciality societies: the need for a critical appraisal”, Lancet, Vol. 355 No. 9198, pp. 103-6.
-
(2000)
Lancet
, vol.355
, Issue.9198
, pp. 103-106
-
-
Grilli, R.1
-
17
-
-
0027210592
-
The uncritical acceptance of medical innovation
-
Grimes, D.A. (1993), “The uncritical acceptance of medical innovation”, JAMA, Vol. 269, pp. 3030-3.
-
(1993)
JAMA
, vol.269
, pp. 3030-3033
-
-
Grimes, D.A.1
-
19
-
-
0033528375
-
Clinical guidelines: legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines
-
Hurwitz, B. (1999), “Clinical guidelines: legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines”, BMJ, Vol. 318, pp. 661-4.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.318
, pp. 661-664
-
-
Hurwitz, B.1
-
21
-
-
0032721879
-
Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement
-
Kavanagh, M.D., Rann, C.S., Powe, N.R., Woo, A.W., Wilson, M.H., Abboud, P.A.C. and Reuben, H.R. (1999), “Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement”, JAMA, Vol. 282, pp. 1458-65.
-
(1999)
JAMA
, vol.282
, pp. 1458-1465
-
-
Kavanagh, M.D.1
Rann, C.S.2
Powe, N.R.3
Woo, A.W.4
Wilson, M.H.5
Abboud, P.A.C.6
Reuben, H.R.7
-
22
-
-
0031664637
-
Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework
-
Kitson, A., Harvey, G. and McCormack, D. (1998), “Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework”, Quality in Healthcare, Vol. 7, pp. 149-58.
-
(1998)
Quality in Healthcare
, vol.7
, pp. 149-158
-
-
Kitson, A.1
Harvey, G.2
McCormack, D.3
-
23
-
-
0004079566
-
-
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
Montgomery, J. (2002), Health Care Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
(2002)
Health Care Law
-
-
Montgomery, J.1
-
24
-
-
0004140725
-
-
Department of Health, London.
-
NHS Executive (1996), Clinical Guidelines, Department of Health, London.
-
(1996)
Clinical Guidelines
-
-
-
25
-
-
0033867560
-
Treating individuals according to evidence: why do primary care practitioners do what they do?
-
Oswald, N. and Bateman, H. (2000), “Treating individuals according to evidence: why do primary care practitioners do what they do?”, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 6, pp. 139-48.
-
(2000)
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
, vol.6
, pp. 139-148
-
-
Oswald, N.1
Bateman, H.2
-
26
-
-
0037350349
-
Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: will NICE make a difference?
-
Samanta, A., Samanta, J. and Gunn, M. (2003), “Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: will NICE make a difference?”, J. Roy. Soc. Med., Vol. 96, pp. 133-8.
-
(2003)
J. Roy. Soc. Med.
, vol.96
, pp. 133-138
-
-
Samanta, A.1
Samanta, J.2
Gunn, M.3
-
27
-
-
0033608442
-
Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines
-
Shekelle, P.G., Wolfe, S.H., Eccles, M. and Grimshaw, J. (1999), “Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines”, BMJ, Vol. 318, pp. 593-6.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.318
, pp. 593-596
-
-
Shekelle, P.G.1
Wolfe, S.H.2
Eccles, M.3
Grimshaw, J.4
-
28
-
-
0012712546
-
NICE work? Rationing, review and the ‘legitimacy problem’ in the new NHS
-
Syrett, K. (2002), “NICE work? Rationing, review and the ‘legitimacy problem’ in the new NHS”, Med. L. R., Vol. 10, pp. 1-27.
-
(2002)
Med. L. R.
, vol.10
, pp. 1-27
-
-
Syrett, K.1
-
29
-
-
0012625744
-
The developing role of clinical guidelines
-
in Tingle, J. and Foster, C. (Eds), Cavendish Publishing Ltd, London.
-
Tingle, J. (2002), “The developing role of clinical guidelines”, in Tingle, J. and Foster, C. (Eds), Clinical Guidelines: Law, Policy and Practice, Cavendish Publishing Ltd, London.
-
(2002)
Clinical Guidelines: Law, Policy and Practice
-
-
Tingle, J.1
|