Estimating research productivity and quality in assistive technology: A bibliometric analysis spanning four decades

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 422-429

  Ryan, Cindy ^a   Tewey, Betsy ^a   Newman, Shelia ^a   Turner, Tracy ^a   Jaeger, Robert J ^b  

^a New Editions   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Databases; Libraries; Terminology

Indexed keywords

PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SAMPLING;

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; CONTROLLED VOCABULARY; JOURNAL CIRCULATIONS; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; EXAMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MEDLINE; NOMENCLATURE; PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLICATION; SAMPLE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TIME;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; MEDLINE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PERIODICALS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH; SELF-HELP DEVICES; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 10244227868     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.838568     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. J. Boldt, W. Maleck, and K. P. Koetter, "Which countries publish in important anesthesia and critical care journals?," Anesth. Analg., vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1175-1180, May 1999.
2. M. Callaham, R. L. Wears, and E. Weber, "Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals," JAMA, vol. 287, no. 21, pp. 2847-2850, June 5, 2002.
3. J. Couzin, "Biomedical research: VA shaken by plan to cut research, cultivate the 'stars.'," Science, vol. 301, no. 5629, pp. 24-25, 2003.
4. A. Fassoulaki, K. Papilas, A. Paraskeva, and K. Patris, "Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination," Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 902-905, Aug. 2002.
5. E. Garfield, "Use of journal citation reports and journal performance indicators in measuring short and long term journal impact," Croatian Med. J., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 368-374, 2000.
6. (1993, Jan.) Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. [Online]www.whitehouse.gov/omb/mgmt-gpra/gplaw2m.html
7. B. A. Haller. (1999) Final report for the Center for an Accessible Society: How does the press view and report on disability topics?. [Online]http://accessiblesociety.org/topics/coverage/0799haller.htm
8. International Standards Organization, "ISO 9999 technical aids for persons with disabilities - Classification and terminology," ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 3rd ed., Oct. 15, 2002.
9. G. B. Jemec, "Impact factors of dermatological journals for 1991-2000," BMC Dermatol., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 7, 2001.
10. K. P. Lee, M. Schotland, P. Bacchetti, and L. A. Bero, "Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles," JAMA, vol. 287, no. 21, pp. 2805-2808, June 5, 2002.
11. Office of Management and Budget. OMB program assessment rating tool. [Online]http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/
12. D. Roy, J. P. Hughes, A. S. Jones, and J. E. Fenton, "Citation analysis of otorhinolaryngology journals," J. Laryngol. Otol., vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 363-366, May 2002.
13. The Research Exchange. (1999) Disability research and the media. [Online]http://www.ncddr.org/du/researchexchange/v04no3
14. The Research Exchange. (1997) How Do consumers get information they can use?. [Online]http://www.ncddr.org/du/researchexchange/v02no4
15. "The Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals With Disabilities Act of 1988," 29 U.S.C. Sec. 2202(2).