Using Technology to Enhance Relationships in Interactive Television Classrooms

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 357-362

  Bader, Mary B ^a   Roy, Sam ^a  

^a MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10044258022     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832329909601711     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anagal, J., Interactive instructional television: Education for rural areas. Conference Proceedings, America Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES). Baltimore. March 20–23.
2. Beed, T., Gianchetta, L., and Withycombe, R., 1992. Instructional television: Does it affect student attitudes?. Journal of Education for Business, 67 (3): 164–167.
3. Biner, P. M., Summers, M., and Gelder, B., 1996. Student satisfaction with interaction telecourses as a function of demographic variables and prior telecourse experience. Distant Education, 17 (1): 33–43.
4. Chapman, A., Using interactive video to teach learning theory to undergraduates: Problems and benefits. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Tuscaloosa, AL. November.
5. Cirtin, A., 1996. The MBA degree on television: The fusion of teaching and technology. T.H.E. Journal,: 70–73. June
6. Cuffman, D., and MacRae, N., Faculty development programs in interactive television. Proceedings of the Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference. Murfreesboro, TN. March-April.
7. Cutshall, R., and Waltz, D., 1997. Utilizing two-way interactive audio/video for distance audiences. Business Education Forum, 51 (3): 19–22.
8. Egan, M. W., and Sebastian, J. P., Quality television instruction: Views of on-site rural facilitators. Conference Proceedings, American Council on Rural Special Education. San Antonio, TX. March 26–29.
9. Freddolino, R. P., 1996. The importance of relationships for a quality environment in interactive TV classrooms. Journal of Education for Business, 71 (4): 205–208.
10. Heiens, R. A., and Hulse, D. B., 1996. Two-way interactive television: An emerging technology for university level business school instruction. Journal of Education for Business., 72 (2): 74–77.
11. Oliver, R., and McLoughlin, C., An investigation of the nature and form of interactive live television. Paper presented at EdTech 1996 Biennial Conference of the Australian Society for Educational Technology. Melbourn, Australia. July.
12. Pool, P., 1996. Teaching via interactive television: An examination of teaching effectiveness and student satisfaction. Journal of Education for Business, 72 (2): 79–81.
13. Silvernail, D., and Johnson, J., 1992. The impact of interactive televised instruction on student evaluations of their instructors. Educational Technology, 32 (6): 47–50.
14. Swift, C. O., Wilson, J. N., and Wayland, J. P., 1997. Interactive distant education in business: Is the new technology right for you?. Journal of Education for Business, 73 (2): 85–89.
15. Thomas, K. J., Ethical issues relating to teaching via an interactive two-way television system (ITV). Proceedings of the Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference. Murfreesboro, TN. March-April 31-2.
16. Tiene, D. W., 1997. Student perspective on distant learning with interactive television. TechTrends, 42 (1): 41–47.
17. Westbrook, T. S., and Moon, D. K., 1997. Lessons learned from the delivery of a graduate business degree program utilizing interactive television. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 45 (2): 25–33.