The role of negative features in joint and separate evaluation

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 313-329

  Willemsen, Martijn C ^a   Keren, Gideon ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Judgment and choice; Loss aversion; Preference reversal; Separate vs. Joint evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 10044246276     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.476     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fischer, G. W., & Hawkins, S. A. (1993). Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 580-597.
2. Ganzach, Y. (1995). Attribute scatter and decision outcome: judgment versus choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 113-122.
3. Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: an explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 247-257.
4. Hsee, C. K., & Leclerc, F. (1998). Will products look more attractive when presented separately or together? Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 175-186.
5. Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2004). Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 680-695.
6. Hsee, C. K., Blount, S., Loewenstein, G. F., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: a review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 576-590.
7. Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 296-311.
8. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
10. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversal of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55.
11. Luce, M. F., Bettman, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (2001). Emotional decisions: tradeoff difficulty and coping in consumer choice. Monographs of the Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 1-209.
12. Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, I. (1997). Attribute-task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 205-218.
13. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061.
14. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-384.
15. Willemsen, M. C., & Keren, G. (2002). Negative-based prominence: the role of negative features in matching and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 643-666.