Electrosurgery after cochlear implantation: Eighth nerve electrophysiology

Laryngoscope

Volumn 114, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2252-2254

  Poetker, David M ^a   Runge Samuelson, Christina L ^a   Firszt, Jill B ^a   Wackym, P Ashley ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac surgery; Cochlear implant; Electrically evoked compound action potential; Electrocautery; Electrosurgery; Evoked auditory potential; Neural response imaging; Neural response telemetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROSURGERY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NERVE POTENTIAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; TELEMETRY;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR NERVE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROSURGERY; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 10044243977     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149469.03575.91     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Roland JT, Fishman AJ, Waltzman SB, Cohen NL. Shaw scalpel in revision cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;185(Suppl):23-25.
2. Smith TL, Smith JM. Electrosurgery in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: principles, advances, and complications. Laryngoscope 2001;111:769-780.
3. Package Insert for HiResolution Bionic Ear System. Sylmar, CA: Advanced Bionics Corporation, 2004.
4. Physician's Package Insert for Nucleus 24 Contour cochlear implants CI24R(CS), CI24R(CA), CI24RE(CA). Lane Cove NSW, Australia: Cochlear Limited, 2004.
5. Package Insert for COMBI 40+ Cochlear Implant System. Innsbruck, Austria: MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geraete GmbH, 2004.
6. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials II. Parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:2205-2210.
7. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz BJ. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1998;19:320-327.
8. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, et al. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hearing 1999;20:45-59.
9. Dillier N, Lai WK, Almqvist B, et al. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:407-414.
10. Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, de Laat JA, Grote JJ. Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear Hearing 2002;23:184-197.
11. Laszig R, Ridder GJ, Aschendorff A, Fradis M. Ultracision: AN alternative to electrosurgery in revision cochlear implant surgery. Laryngoscope 2002;112:190-191.
12. Roberts S, West LA, Liewehr FR, et al. Impact of dental devices on cochlear implants. J Endodontics 2002;28:40-43.
13. Pinski SL, Trohman RG. Interference in implanted cardiac devices. Part II. J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1496-1509.
14. Rozner MA. [letter]. Review of electrical interference in implanted cardiac devices. J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26:923-925.
15. El-Gamal HM, Dufresne RG, Saddler K. Electrosurgery, pacemakers and ICDs: a survey of precautions and complications experienced by cutaneous surgeons. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:385-390.