Assessment of myocardial viability by intracellular 23Na magnetic resonance imaging

Circulation

Volumn 110, Issue 22, 2004, Pages 3457-3464

  Jansen, Maurits A ^a,b   Van Emous, Jan G ^a,b   Nederhoff, Marcel G J ^b   Van Echteld, Cees J A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ischemia; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardium; Reperfusion; Sodium

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE; SODIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEART MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; MALE; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; MYOCARDIUM; MYOCYTES, CARDIAC; NA(+)-K(+)-EXCHANGING ATPASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SARCOLEMMA; SODIUM; SODIUM-HYDROGEN ANTIPORTER;

EID: 10044237736     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148132.15105.0E     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Iskandrian AS, Heo J, Stanberry C. When is myocardial viability an important clinical issue? J Nucl Med 1994;35:4S-7S.
2. Matsunari I, Taki J, Nakajima K, Tonami N, Hisada K. Myocardial viability assessment using nuclear imaging. Ann Nucl Med. 2003;17: 169-179.
3. Schecter SO, Teichholz LE, Klig V, Goldman ME. Ultrasonic tissue characterization: review of a noninvasive technique for assessing myocardial viability. Echocardiography. 1996;13:415-430.
4. Bonow RO. Identification of viable myocardium. Circulation. 1996;94: 2674-2680.
5. + during myocardial ischemia: consequences for post-ischemic recovery. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997;29:85-96.
6. + exchange blockers EIPA, cariporide and eniporide. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003;250:47-54.
7. + exchanger are immediately active upon post-ischemic reperfusion in isolated rat hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30:337-348.
8. Rochitte CE, Kim RJ, Hillenbrand HB, Chen EL, Lima JA. Microvascular integrity and the time course of myocardial sodium accumulation after acute infarction. Circ Res. 2000;87:648-655.
9. 23Na magnetic resonance imaging of acute reperfused myocardial infarction: potential to assess myocardial viability. Circulation. 1997;95:1877-1885.
10. 23Na CSI in isolated rat hearts. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:89-96.
11. Van Emous JG, Nederhoff MGJ, Van Echteld CJA. Intracellular sodium imaging in acute coronary ligation. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2001; 9:1832. Abstract.
12. Pohmann R, von Kienlin M. Accurate phosphorus metabolite images of the human heart by 3D acquisition-weighted CSI. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:817-826.
13. Avkiran M, Curtis MJ. Independent dual perfusion of left and right coronary arteries in isolated rat hearts. Am J Physiol. 1991;261: H2082-H2090.
14. Ytrehus K, Liu Y, Tsuchida A, Miura T, Liu GS, Yang XM, Herbert D, Cohen MV, Downey JM. Rat and rabbit heart infarction: effects of anesthesia, perfusate, risk zone, and method of infarct sizing. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H2383-H2390.
15. 2 relaxation times during ischemia and reperfusion in isolated rat hearts. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:679-683.
16. DeLayre JL, Ingwall JS, Malloy C, Fossel ET. Gated sodium-23 nuclear magnetic resonance images of an isolated perfused working rat heart. Science. 1981;212:935-936.
17. 31P MR, and optical spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:899-908.
18. Cannon PJ, Maudsley AA, Hilal SK, Simon HE, Cassidy F. Sodium nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial tissue of dogs after coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:573-579.
19. 23Na MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:1144-1151.
20. 23Na MR imaging: comparison with cine MR imaging and delayed contrast enhancement. Radiology. 2001;221:222-228.
21. Lee RF, Giaquinto R, Constantinides C, Souza S, Weiss RG, Bottomley PA. A broadband phased-array system for direct phosphorus and sodium metabolic MRI on a clinical scanner. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43:269-277.
22. Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lima JA, Judd RM. Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation. 1996; 94:3318-3326.
23. Allen DG, Cairns SP, Turvey SE, Lee JA. Intracellular calcium and myocardial function during ischemia. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1993;346:19-29.
24. 87Rb NMR spectroscopic study. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:673-685.
25. Polimeni PI. Extracellular space and ionic distribution in rat ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1974;227:676-683.
26. 201TI tomography versus dobutamine echocardiography. Circulation. 1996;94:2712-2719.
27. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1445-1453.
28. Saeed M, Wendland MF, Bremerich GL, Weinmann HJ, Higgins CB. Assessment of myocardial viability using standard extracellular and necrosis specific MR contrast media. Acad Radiol 2002;9(suppl 1):S84-S87.
29. Inoue S, Murakami Y, Ochiai K, Kitamura J, Ishibashi Y, Kawamitsu H, Sugimura K, Shimada T. The contributory role of interstitial water in Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI in myocardial infarction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:215-219.
30. Saeed M, Lund G, Wendland MF, Bremerich J, Weinmann H, Higgins CB. Magnetic resonance characterization of the peri-infarction zone of reperfused myocardial infarction with necrosis-specific and extracellular nonspecific contrast media. Circulation. 2001;103:871-876.