Social dilemmas and the communicative planning paradox

Town Planning Review

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 77-95

  Voogd, Henk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; PLANNING PROCESS; PLANNING THEORY; SPATIAL PLANNING; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 0035017710     PISSN: 00410020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2001.72.1.77     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ALEXANDER, E. R. (1992), Approaches to Planning (Second edition), Philadelphia, Gordon and Breach.
2. ALTSHULER, A. (1965), The City Planning Process, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
3. ASHWORTH, G. J. (1901), Heritage Planning: Conservation as the Management of Urban Change, Groningen, Geopers.
4. AXELROD, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books.
5. BLOWERS, A. (ed.) (1993), Planning for a Sustainable Environment, London, Earthscan.
6. BUS, A. and VOOGD, H. (1998), 'From households to urban metabolism; ecological renewal of neighborhoods' in K. J. Noorman and A. J. M. School Uiterkamp (eds), Green Households? Domestic Consumers, Environment and Sustainability, London, Earthscan, 121-40.
7. BUS, A. G. (1999), 'Ecological renewal of post war neighbourhoods: problems and solutions' in D. Miller, and G. de Roo (eds), Integrating City Planning and Environmental Improvement, Aldershot, Ashgate, 203-22.
8. CAMPBELL, S. and FAINSTEIN, S. (eds) (1996), Readings in Planning Theory, Oxford, Blackwell.
9. CHRISTENSEN, K. (1985), 'Coping with uncertainty in planning', Journal of the American Planning Association, 51, 63-73.
10. COMMISSION FOR THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1992), The Principle of Subsidiarity (Communication of the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament), SEC 92, 27 October, Brussels, CEC.
11. CROWFOOT, J. E. and WONDOLLECK, J. M. (1990), Environmental Disputes: Community Involvement in Conflict Resolution, Washington, DC, Island Press.
12. CREIGHTON, J. L. (1992), Involving Citizens in Community Decision Making: A Guide-book, Washington, DC, Program for Community Problem Solving.
13. DAWES, R. M. (1980), Social Dilemmas, Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-93.
14. DAY, D, (1997), 'Citizen participation in the planning process: an essentially contested concept?', Journal of Planning Literature, 11, 421-34.
15. DE SOUZA BRIGGS, X. (1997), Doing Democracy Up-Close: Culture, Power and Communication in Community Planning (Working Paper), Cambridge, MA, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
16. EICHENBERGER, R. (1994), 'The benefits of federalism and the risk of overcentralisation', Kyklos, 47, 403-20.
17. FALUDI, A. and KORTHALS ALTES, W. (1994), 'Evaluating communicative planning: a revised design for performance research', European Planning Studies, 2, 403-18.
18. FELKINS, L. (1996), The voter's paradox, http://www.spectacle.org/995/sd.html
19. FLYVBERG, B. (1996), Rationality and power, Aldershot, Avebury.
20. FORRESTER, J. (1989), Planning in the Face of Power, Los Angeles, University of California Press.
21. FRIEDMANN, J. (1973), Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning, Garden City, NY, Anchor Press/Doubleday.
22. GRANT, J. (1994), The Drama of Democracy: Contention and Dispute in Community Planning, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
23. HALL, P. (1981), Great Planning Disasters, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
24. HARDIN, G. R. (1968), 'The tragedy of the commons', Science, 162, 1243-48.
25. HEALEY, P. (1992), 'A planner's day: knowledge and action in communicative practice', Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 9-20.
26. HEALEY, P., PURDUE, M. and ENNIS, F. (1995), Negotiating Development: Rationales and Practice for Development Obligations and Planning Gain, London, E & FN Spon.
27. HEALEY, P. (1997), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Basing-stoke, Macmillan.
28. HELLING, A., 'Collaborative visioning: proceed with caution', Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, 335-49.
29. INNES, J. (1995), 'Planning theory's emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice', Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183-89.
30. INNES, J. (1996), 'Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal', Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460-72.
31. KLEVER, W. (1995), Een nieuwe Spinoza: in veertig facetten (A New Spinoza: In Forty Facets), Amsterdam, Wereldbibliotheek.
32. KUHN, T. S. (1969), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
33. LEE, D. (1973), 'Requiem for the large scale model', Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39, 163-78.
34. LICHFIELD, N. (1996), Community Impact Evaluation, London, UCL Press.
35. MACCORMICK, N. (1997), 'Democracy, subsidiarity, and citizenship in the "European Commonwealth"', Law and Philosophy, 16, 331-56.
36. MANDELBAUM, S. J., MAZZA, L. and BURCHELL, R. W. (eds) (1996), Explorations in Planning Theory, New Jersey, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
37. MENKEL, W. and HEINZ, I. (1997), 'Standards in the water sector; the principle of subsidiarity and the role of cost-benefit analysis', Water Supply, 15, 75-84.
38. MILLER, D. and ROO, G. de (eds) (1997), Urban Environmental Planning; Policies, Instruments and Methods in an International Perspective, Aldershot, Avebury.
39. MINISTRY OF PHYSICAL PLANNING (1988), Fourth Report on Physical Planning, The Hague, SDU-Publishers.
40. OLSON, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
41. PARFIT, D. (1984), Reasons and Persons, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
42. PARTIDÁRIO, M. and VOOGD, H. (1999), 'An endeavour at integration in environmental analysis and planning' in D. Miller and G. de Roo (eds), Integrating City Planning and Environmental Improvement, Aldershot, Ashgate, 329-40.
43. PORTER, J. M. (ed.) (1989), Classical Political Philosophy, Scarborough, Prentice-Hall.
44. PRESSMAN, J. L. and WILDAVSKY, W. (1973), Implementation, Berkeley, University of California Press.
45. PUTNAM, R. D. (1993), 'The prosperous community: social capital and public life', The American Prospect, 13, 35-42,
46. PUTNAM, R. D. (1995), 'Bowling alone: America's decline in social capital', Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
47. RAPAPORT, A. and CHAMMAH, A. N. (1965), Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
48. RIKER, W. H. and ORDESHOOK, P. C. (1973), An Introduction to Positive Political Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
49. RITTEL, H. and WEBBER, M. M. (1973), 'Dilemmas in a general theory of planning', Policy Sciences, 4, 155-69.
50. RIVLIN, A. (1971), Systematic Thinking for Social Action, Washington DC, Brookings.
51. RUTTE, C. G., WILKE, H. A. M. and MESSICK, D. M. (1987), 'The effects of framing social dilemmas as "give some" or "take some" games', British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 103-08.
52. SAGER, T. (1994), Communicative Planning Theory, Aldershot, Avebury.
53. SCHULER, D. (1994), 'Community net-works: building a new participatory medium', Communications of the ACM, 37, 39-51,
54. SUSSKIND, L. and CRUIKSHANK, J. (1987), Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes, New York, Basic Books.
55. TOULEMONDE, J. (1996), 'Can we evaluate subsidiarity? Elements of answers from the European practice', International Review of Administrative Sciences, 62, 49-62.
56. VLEK, C. A. J. and KEREN, G. B. (1992), 'Behavioral decision theory and environmental risk management: assessment and resolution of four "survival" dilemmas', Acta Psychologica, 80, 249-78.
57. VOOGD, H. (ed.) (1994), Issues in Environmental Planning, London, Pion.
58. VOOGD, H. (1995), 'Environmental management of social dilemmas', European Spatial Research and Policy, 2, 5-16.
59. VOOGD, H. (1997), 'The changing role of evaluation methods in a changing planning environment: some Dutch experiences', European Planning Studies, 5, 257-66.
60. WEBLER, T. and RENN, O. (1995), 'A brief primer on participation: philosophy and practice' in O. Renn, T. Webler and P. Wiedmann (eds), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 17-33.
61. WILKE, H. A. M., LIEBRAND, W. B. G. and BOER, K. DE (1986), 'Standards of justice and quality of power in a social dilemma situation', British Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 51-53.
62. WOLTJER, J. (1997), 'De kcerzijde van draagvlak, ruimtelijke ordening niet altijd gebaat bij maatschappelijke discussie' ('The drawback of consensus, societal debates not always useful for spatial planning') Stedebouw en Ruimtelijke Ordening, 4, 47-52.
63. WOLTJER, J. (2000), Consensus Planning, Aldershot, Ashgate.