Quantification of sources of variation and accuracy of sequence discrimination in a replicated microarray experiment

BioTechniques

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 324-332

  Brown, J Steven ^a   Kuhn, David ^b   Wisser, Randall ^c   Power, Emilio ^a   Schnell, Raymond ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; FLUORESCENCE; GENES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION (COV); RESISTANCE GENE HOMOLOGS (RGH);

DNA;

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; FLUORESCENT DYE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CACAO; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA REPLICATION; DYE FLIP DESIGN; GENETIC RESISTANCE; HYBRIDIZATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE ARRAY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POSITION AND PIN EFFECT; PROCESS DESIGN; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RESISTANCE GENE HOMOLOG; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 0842331389     PISSN: 07366205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2144/04362mt04     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Coombes, K.R., E.W. Highsmith, T.A. Krogmann, K.A. Baggerly, D.N. Stivers, and L.V. Abruzzo. 2002. Identifying and quantifying sources of variation in microarray data using high-density cDNA membrane arrays. J. Comp. Biol. 9:655-669.
2. Sherlock, G., T. Hernandez-Boussard, A. Kasarskis, G. Binkley, J. Matese, S. Dwight, M. Kaloper, S. Weng, et al. 2001. The Stanford microarray database. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:152-155.
3. Quackenbush, J. 2001. Computational analysis of microarray data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:418-427.
4. Yue, H., P.S. Eastman, B.B. Wang, J. Minor, M.H. Doctolero, R.L. Nuttall, R. Stack, J.W. Becker, J.R. Montgomery, et al. 2001. An evaluation of the performance of cDNA microarrays for detecting changes in global mRNA expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e41.
5. Kerr, K.M., M. Mitchell, and G.A. Churchill. 2000. Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data. J. Comp. Biol. 7:819-837.
6. Wolfinger, R.D., G. Gibson, E.D. Wolfinger, L. Bennett, H. Hamadeh, P. Bushel, C. Afshari, and R.S. Paules. 2001. Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models. J. Comp. Biol. 8:625-637.
7. Lee, M.L., F.C. Kuo, G.A. Whitmore, and J. Sklar. 2000. Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:9834-9839.
8. Kuhn, D.N., M. Heath, R.J. Wisser, A. Meerow, J.S. Brown, U. Lopez, and R.J. Schnell. 2003. Resistance gene homologues in Theobroma cacao as useful genetic markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:191-202.
9. Kerr, K.M. and G.A. Churchill. 2001b. Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data. Genet. Res. 77:123-128.
10. Kerr, K.M. and G.A. Churchill. 2001a. Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. Biostatistics 2:183-201.
11. Searle, S.R. 1971. Linear Models. John Wiley, New York.
12. SAS® Institute. 2000. SAS/STAT Software Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
13. Neter, J. and W. Wasserman. 1976. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
14. Brown, J.S. and B. Glaz.. 2001. Analysis of resource allocation in final stage sugarcane clonal selection. Crop Sci. 41:57-62.