Landscapes in change - Opposing attitudes in Saaremaa, Estonia

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 67, Issue 1-4, 2004, Pages 109-120

  Kaur, Egle ^a   Palang, Hannes ^a   Sooväli, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Landscape; Perceptions; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

DEGRADATION; LANDFORMS; NEWSPRINT; STUDENTS;

LANDSCAPES;

URBAN PLANNING;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; STAKEHOLDER;

BALTIC STATES; ESTONIA; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SAAREMAA;

EID: 0842327944     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00032-X     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abello S., Bernaldez F.G. Landscape preference and personality. Landsc. Urban Plan. 13:1986;19-28.
2. Antrop M. Landscape change: plan or chaos? Landsc. Urban Plan. 41:1998;155-161.
3. Antrop M. Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis, agriculture, ecosystems, cosystems & environment. Landsc. Urban Plan. 77:2000;17-28.
4. Carpenter, S., 1991. Dealing with environmental and other complex public disputes. In: Duffy Grover, K., Grosch, J.W., Olczak, P.V. (Eds.), Community Mediation. A Handbook for Practioners and researchers. The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 313-326.
5. Cosgrove, D., 1984. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
6. Cudlínová E., Lapka M., Bartoš M. Problems of agriculture and landscape management as perceived by farmers of the Šumava Mountains (Czech Republic). Landsc. Urban Plan. 46:1999;71-82.
7. Duncan J.S. Landscape geography 1993-1994. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 19:1995;414-422.
8. Fiske, J., 1990. Introduction to Communication Studies, second ed. Routledge, London.
9. Haines-Young, R.H., Potschin, M.B., 2000. Multifunctionality and value. In: Brandt, J., Tress, B., Tress, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Multifunctional Landscapes - Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, pp. 111-118.
10. Herzog T.R., Herbert E.J., Kaplan R., Crooks C.L. Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences. Environ. Behav. 32:2000;301-323.
11. Holsti, O., 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
12. Hull R.B., Stewart W.P. The landscape encountered and experienced while hiking. Environ. Behav. 27:1995;404-406.
13. Jones, M., 1993. Landscape as a resource and the problem of landscape values. In: Rusten, C., Wøien, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on The Politics of Environmental Conservation. Trondheim. University of Trondheim, pp. 19-33.
14. Kevvai, T., 1997. Production and Processing, Agriculture in Estonia 1996, Ministry of Agriculture.
15. Linehan J.R., Gross M. Back to the future, back to basics: the social ecology of landscapes and the future of landscape planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 42:1998;207-223.
16. Luz F. Participatory landscape ecology - a basis for acceptance and implementation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 50:2000;159-168.
17. Lyons E. Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environ. Behav. 15:1983;487-511.
18. Lyons E., Breakwell G.M. Factors predicting environmental concern and indifference in 13- to 16-years-olds. Environ. Behav. 26:1994;223-238.
19. Mander Ü., Palang H. Changes of landscape structure in Estonia during the Soviet Period. GeoJournal. 33:1994;45-54.
20. Marcucci D.J. Landscape history as a planning tool. Landsc. Urban Plan. 49:2000;67-81.
21. McQuail, D., 1991. Mass Communication Theory. An Introduction, second ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
22. Newell P.B. A cross-cultural examination of favorite places. Environ. Behav. 29:1997;495-515.
23. Oreszczyn S. A system a approach to the research of people's relationship with English hedgerows. Landsc. Urban Plan. 50:2000;107-117.
24. Palang H., Kaur E., Alumäe H., Jürimäe K. Conflicts between landscape values as a driving force for landscape management. Norsk Geografisk Tidskrift - Norwegian J. Geogr. 53:1999;153-159.
25. Palang H., Alumäe H., Mander Ü. Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landsc. Urban Plan. 50:2000;85-94.
26. Palang, H., Alumäe, H., Kaur, E., 2003a. What do locals like in Estonian landscapes? In: Urwin, T., Spek, T. (Eds.), European Landscapes: from Mountain to Sea. Proceedings of the 19th Session of the Permanent European Conference for the Study of Rural Landscape at London and Aberystwyth (UK). 10-17 September 2000, Huma Publishers, Tallinn, pp. 93-100.
27. Palang, H., Alumäe, H., Printsmann, A., Sepp K., 2003b. Defining valuable landscapes for planning purposes. In: Brandt, J., Vejre, H., Pinto Correia, T. (Eds.), Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. WIT Press, in press.
28. Palang H., Mander Ü., Luud A. Landscape diversity dynamics in Estonia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 41:1998;163-169.
29. Peterson U., Aunap R. Changes in agricultural land use in Estonia in the 1990s detected with multitemporal Landsat imagery. Landsc. Urban Plan. 41:1998;193-201.
30. Sooväli, H., Palang, H., Külvik, M., 2001. The role of rural landscapes in shaping Estonian national identity. In: Proceedings of the 19th session of the Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape, Egham and Aberystwyth, UK, September 2000, in press.
31. Tress B., Tress G. Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landsc. Urban Plan. 57:2001;143-157.
32. Van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., Jacobs, S., 1997. Argumentation. In: van Dijk, T.A. (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, London, pp. 208-229.
33. Vos W., Meekes H. Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc. Urban Plan. 46:1999;3-14.
34. Zube E.H., Pitt D.G. Cross-cultural perceptions of scenic and heritage landscapes. Landsc. Plan. 8:1981;69-87.
35. Zube E.H., Sell J.L., Taylor J.G. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landsc. Plan. 9:1982;1-33.