Problems of agriculture and landscape management as perceived by farmers of the Sumava Mountains (Czech Republic)

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 46, Issue 1-3, 1999, Pages 71-82

  Cudlinova E ^a   Lapka, M ^a   Bartos M ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; LANDSCAPE PROTECTION; RURAL PLANNING;

CZECH REPUBLIC; SUMAVA MOUNTAINS;

EID: 0345008960     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00048-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Altieri M.A. Traditional farming in Latin America. The Ecologist. 21(2):1991;93-96.
2. Babie, E., 1995. The Practice of Social Sampling. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
3. Bailey, K.D., 1992. Methods of Social Research. Free Press, New York.
4. Bachtin, M. M., 1979. An Aesthetics of the Literary Art. Isskustvo, Moskva (in Russian).
5. Bachtin, M. M., 1981. Discourse in the novel. In Michael Holquist (Ed.), The Dialogical Imagination, University of Texas, Austin, pp. 259-442.
6. Barlett, P., 1993. American Dreams, Rural Realities. Family Farms in Crisis. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London.
7. Bartoš, M., Těšitel, Kušová, D., 1994. Large-scale land abandonment and its consequences (Šumava Mountains case study). In: Richling, A., Malinowska, E., Lechnio J. (Eds.), Landscape Research and its Applications in Environmental Management. Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, Warsaw University, pp. 213-220.
8. Berry, W., 1987. A defense of the family farm. In: Comstock, G. (Ed.), Is there a Moral Obligation to save the Family Farm?, Iowa State University Press, pp. 347-360.
9. Czechoslovak Institute of Statistics, 1950. Statistical yearbook ČSSR 1950, Prague (in Czech).
10. Statistical yearbook ČSSR 1988, Prague (in Czech).
11. Dower M. Europe's landscape and the Bern Convention. Naturopa. 77:1995;24-25.
12. Gasson R. Goals and values of farmers. J. Agric. Econom. 24(3):1983;521-537.
13. Glenna, L., 1996. Rationality, habituis, and agricultural landscapes: ethnographic case studies in landscape sociology. Agriculture and Human Values, forthcoming.
14. de Haan, H., 1994. In the Shadow of the Tree. Kinship, Property and Inheritance Among Farm Families, Het Spinhus Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 215-246, 288-300; Hobbs, 1997, p. 4.
15. de Haan, H., 1994. In the Shadow of the Tree. Kinship, Property and Inheritance Among Farm Families, Het Spinhus Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 215-246, 288-300; Hobbs, 1997, p. 4.
16. Hobbs R. Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landscape Urban Planning. 37:1997;1-9.
17. Honner, J., Prokopová, M., 1994. Šumava Mountains in the year 1991. Czech Institute of Statistics, České Budějovice (in Czech).
18. Kraft, S.E., 1989. Is there a place for ethnomethodology in the analysis of agricultural public policy - the case for the environment. Paper presented at the Second Biennial Conference of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society, Little Rock, AK.
19. Lapka, M., 1994. Czech landscape as an object of scientific research. In: Svobodová, H. (Ed.), Česká krajina dnes. Karolinum, Universita Karlova, Prague, pp.39-49 (in Czech).
20. Lapka M., Cudlínová E. Human sources of landscape stewardship: the reemergence of private farming in the Czech Republic. Landscape Res. 21(3):1996;231-242.
21. Lapka, M., Rikoon, S., Cudlínová, E., 1997. Social and cultural factors affecting protection of the Czech landscape. Implication for future conservation strategies. In: Napier, T. (Ed.): World Association of Soil and Water Conservation Society (WAWSC).
22. Mejstřík, V., Bartoš, M., Hanousková, I., Těšitel, J., 1995. Abandoned landscapes in the Czech Republic. In: Schoute, J. (Ed.), Scenario Studies for the Rural Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, Boston, London, pp. 717-723.
23. Ministry of Agriculture, 1994. A report about state of Czech agriculture - Green Report Agrospoj, Prague, pp. 68-70.
24. Newby, H., 1980. Green and Pleasant Land? Social Change in Rural England. Pelican Books, Harmondsworth.
25. Ostrander, S., 1984. Women in the Upper Class. Philadephia: Temple University Press.
26. Redfield, R., 1960. The little Community. Peasant Society and Culture. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
27. Richards, P., 1993. Cultivation: knowledge or performance. In Hobart, M. (Ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance, Routledge, London, pp. 61-78.
28. Riegler, J., Popp, H.W., Kroll-Schluter, H., 1997. Where are European peasants Going? Revolt or Departure, Ministry of Regional Development, Prague, pp. 7-15.
29. Rikoon, J.S., 1988. Threshing in the Midwest 1820-1940. A Study of Traditional Culture and Technological Change. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp.154-163.
30. Rikoon J.S., Constance D.H., Galetta S. Factors affecting farmers' use and rejection of banded pesticide applications. J. Soil Water Conserv. 51(4):1996;322-334.
31. Rushdy, S., 1997. In India, the New Era development Institute takes a new approach to vocational education. One country, vol.9, pp. 3: 8-14.
32. Smetánka, Z., 1992. Legend about Ostoj. Mladá fronta, Praha.
33. Zimmerman, C.C., 1946. Outline of cultural rural sociology. The Philips Book Store, Cambridge.