Aharonov-Bohm interferometry with quantum dots: Scattering approach versus tunneling picture

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 20, 2003, Pages 2053031-2053038

  Kubala, Björn ^a   König, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; INTERFEROMETRY; LIGHT SCATTERING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; OSCILLATION; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

EID: 0842290503     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.205303     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. Yacoby, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, and H. Shtrikman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4047 (1995).
2. R. Schuster, E. Buks, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, V. Umansky, and H. Shtrikman, Nature (London) 385, 417 (1997).
3. Y. Ji, M. Heiblum, D. Sprinzak, D. Mahalu, and H. Shtrikman, Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 290, 779 (2000); Y. Ji, M. Heiblum, and H. Shtrikman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076601 (2002).
4. Y. Ji, M. Heiblum, D. Sprinzak, D. Mahalu, and H. Shtrikman, Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 290, 779 (2000); Y. Ji, M. Heiblum, and H. Shtrikman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076601 (2002).
5. W.G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, T. Fujisawa, J.M. Elzerman, S. Tarucha, and L.P. Kouwenhoven, Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 289, 2105 (2000).
6. K. Kobayashi, H. Aikawa, S. Katsumoto, and Y. Iye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 256806 (2002).
7. A.W. Holleitner, C.R. Decker, H. Qin, K. Eberl, and R.H. Blick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 256802 (2001).
8. T.V. Shahbazyan and M.E. Raikh, Phys. Rev. B 49, 17 123 (1994).
9. L.G. Mourokh, N.J.M. Horing, and A.Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. B 66, 085332 (2002).
10. H. Akera, Phys. Rev. B 47, 6835 (1993).
11. D. Loss and E.V. Sukhorukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1035 (2000).
12. U. Gerland, J. v. Delft, T.A. Costi, and Y. Oreg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3710 (2000).
13. W. Hofstetter, J. König, and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 156803 (2001).
14. D. Boese, W. Hofstetter, and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. B 66, 125315 (2002).
15. T. Kim and S. Hershfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 136601 (2002).
16. R. López, R. Aguado, and G. Platero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 136802 (2002).
17. B. Kubala and J. König, Phys. Rev. B 65, 245301 (2002).
18. A. Silva, Y. Oreg, and Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. B 66, 195316 (2002).
19. A. Ueda, I. Baba, K. Suzuki, and M. Eto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72, Suppl. A 157 (2003).
20. K. Kang and S.Y. Cho, cond-mat/0210009 (unpublished).
21. C. Bruder, R. Fazio, and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 114 (1996).
22. J. König and Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3855 (2001).
23. J. König and Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. B 65, 045316 (2002).
24. Y. Gefen, cond-mat/0207440 (unpublished).
25. Y. Gefen, Y. Imry, and M.Ya. Azbel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 129 (1984).
26. M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, and M.Ya. Azbel, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1982 (1984).
27. A. Levy Yeyati and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 52, R14 360 (1995).
28. G. Hackenbroich and H.A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 110 (1996).
29. O. Entin-Wohlman, A. Aharony, Y. Imry, and Y. Levinson, J. Low Temp. Phys. 126, 1251 (2002).
30. H.A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rev. B 65, 245322 (2002).
31. A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, B.I. Halperin, and Y. Imry, Phys. Rev. B 66, 115311 (2002).
32. T. Itoh, Phys. Rev. B 52, 1508 (1995).
33. The reader may have noticed that the way Γ scales with the coupling parameter η is rather counterintuitive. A decoupling of ring and leads as η→1, leads to increased (diverging) level broadening Γ. Below we will analyze this renormalization in a more general context and will resolve the apparent contradiction.