Written orthopedic patient education materials from the point of view of empowerment by education

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 175-181

  Johansson, Kirsi ^a   Salanterä, Sanna ^a   Katajisto, Jouko ^a   Leino Kilpi, Helena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Empowerment by education; Orthopedic nursing; Orthopedic patient education; Written patient education materials

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; EVALUATION; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; NURSING; ORTHOPEDICS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEACHING;

EID: 0842283502     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00036-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Fisher D.A., Trimble S., Clapp B., Dorsett K. Effect of a patient management system on outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 345:1997;155-160.
2. Rasilainen J, Paavolainen P, Talja M, Nenonen M. Regional variation in orthopedic and urological operations in 1995. Statistics 17/1997. Stakes: Helsinki; 1997 [Finnish].
3. Mauer K.A., Abrahams E.B., Arslanian C., Schoenly L., Taggart H.M. National practice patterns for the care of the patient with total joint replacement. Orthop. Nurs. 21:2002;37-44.
4. Gammon J., Mulholland C.W. Effect of preparatory information prior to elective total hip replacement on post-operative physical coping outcomes. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 33:1996;589-604.
5. Pellino T, Tluczek A, Collins M, Trimborn S, Norwick H, Engelke ZK, et al. Increasing self-efficacy through empowerment: preoperative education for orthopedic patients. Orthop Nurs 1998;17:48-51, 54-9.
6. Charnock D., Shepperd S., Needham G., Gann R. Discern: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 53:1999;105-111.
7. Selander S., Troein M., Finnegan J. Jr., Råstam L. The discursive formation of health. A study of printed health education material used in primary care. Patient Educ. Couns. 31:1997;181-189.
8. Mumford M.E. A descriptive study of the readability of patient information leaflets designed by nurses. J. Adv. Nurs. 26:1997;985-991.
9. Chesson A.L. Jr., Murphy P.W., Arnold C.L., Davis T.C. Presentation and reading level of sleep brochures: are they appropriate for sleep disorders patients? Sleep. 21:1998;406-412.
10. Coey L. Readability of printed educational materials used to inform potential and actual ostomates. J. Clin. Nurs. 5:1996;359-366.
11. Timmons M.E., Bower F.L. The effect of structured preoperative teaching on patients' use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and their management of pain. Orthop. Nurs. 12:1993;23-31.
12. Collingsworth S., Gould D., Wainwright S.P. Patient self-administration of medication: a review of the literature. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 34:1997;256-269.
13. Lin P.C., Lin L.C., Lin J.J. Comparing the effectiveness of different educational programs for patients with total knee arthroplasty. Orthop. Nurs. 16:1997;43-49.
14. Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, Abramson M, Bauman A, Hensley MJ, et al. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma (Cochrane Review). In the Cochrane library, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2000.
15. Hinds C., Streater A., Mood D. Functions and preferred methods of receiving information related to radiotherapy. Perceptions of patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs. 18:1995;374-384.
16. Kerridge I.H., Pearson S.A., Rolfe I.E., Lowe M., McPhee J.R. Impact of written information on knowledge and preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. MJA. 171:1999;239-242.
17. Grissom S.P., Dunagan L. Improved satisfaction during rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80:2001;798-803.
18. Ott B.B., Hardie T.L. Readability of advance directive documents. Image J. Nurs. Sch. 29:1997;53-57.
19. Foltz A., Sullivan J. Get clear: clinical testing of patients' reading abilities. Cancer Nurs. 21:1998;162-166.
20. Liimatainen L., Kettunen T., Poskiparta M. Health counseling between nurse and patient in hospital. J. Soc. Med. (Sosiaalilää ketieteellinen Aikakauslehti). 33:1996;81-89. [Finnish].
21. Poskiparta M., Liimatainen L., Kettunen T., Karhila P. From nurse-centered health counseling to empowermental health counseling. Patient Educ. Couns. 45:2001;69-79.
22. Bernier J.M., Yasko J. Designing and evaluating printed education materials: model and instrument development. Patient Educ. Couns. 18:1991;253-263.
23. Bernier J.M. Developing and evaluating printed education materials: a prescriptive model for quality. Orthop. Nurs. 12:1993;39-46.
24. Bernier J.M. Establishing the psychometric properties of a scale for evaluating quality in printed education materials. Patient Educ. Couns. 29:1996;283-299.
25. Santavirta N., Lillqvist G., Sarvimäki A., Honkanen V., Konttinen Y.T., Santavirta S. Teaching of patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 31:1994;135-142.
26. Phelan EA, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. A video programme plus a booklet was more effective than a booklet alone for increasing patient knowledge about lumbar spine treatment options for low back pain. EBN 2001;4:84.
27. Rees C.E., Ford J.E., Sheard C.E. Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices. Patient Educ. Couns. 47:2002;273-275.
28. Doak L.G., Doak C.C., Meade C.D. Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Oncol. Nurs. Forum. 23:1996;1305-1312.
29. Hussey L.C. Strategies for effective patient education material design. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 11:1997;37-46.
30. Krass I., Svarstad B.L., Bultman D. Using alternative methodologies for evaluating patient medication leaflets. Patient Educ. Couns. 47:2002;29-35.
31. Teasdale K. Empowering patients to self-advocate. In: Advocacy in health care. Bodmin, Cornwall, Great Britain: MPG Books Ltd.; 1998. p. 51-61.
32. Leino-Kilpi H., Luoto E., Katajisto J. Elements of empowerment and MS patients. J. Neurosci. Nurs. 18:1998;116-123.
33. Leino-Kilpi H., Mäenpää I., Katajisto J. Nursing study of the significance of rheumatoid arthritis as perceived by patients using the concept of empowerment. J. Orthop. Nurs. 3:1999;138-145.
34. Ridge R.A., Goodson A.S. The relationship between multidisciplinary discharge outcomes and functional status after total hip replacement. Orthop. Nurs. 19:2000;71-82.
35. Showalter A, Burger S, Salyer J. Patients' and their spouses' needs after total joint arthroplasty: a pilot study. Orthop Nurs 2000;19:49-57, 62.
36. Johansson K., Hupli M., Salanterä S. Patients' learning needs after hip arthroplasty. J. Clin. Nurs. 11:2002;634-639.
37. Smith P.T., Cason C.L. Suitability of patient education materials for cardiac catheterisation. Clin. Nurs. Spec. 12:1998;140-146.
38. Fry EB. A readability formula that saves time. J Reading 1968;11:513-6, 575-8.
39. McLaughlin G.H. SMOG grading - a new readability formula. J. Reading. 12:1969;639-646.
40. Wiio OA. Readability, comprehension and readership. Vammala: University of Tampere; 1968.
41. Wiio OA. An introduction to communication (Johdatus viestintää n). Porvoo: WSOY; 1997 [Finnish].
42. Burns N, Grove S. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, critique and utilization. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1997.
43. Grant J.M. The fetal heart rate trace is normal, isn't it? Lancet. 337:1991;215-218.
44. Kirsh I, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Klostad A. Adult literacy in America: a first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education; 1993.