Improving disturbance rejection of PI controllers by means of the magnitude optimum method

ISA Transactions

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 73-84

  Vrančić, Damir ^a   Strmčnik, Stanko ^a   Kocijan, Juš ^a,b  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Disturbance rejection; PID control; Tuning

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE ATTENUATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROCESS CONTROL; SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION; TUNING; VALVES (MECHANICAL);

DISTURBANCE REJECTION; MAGNITUDE OPTIMUM (MO) METHOD; PID CONTROL;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 0742322041     PISSN: 00190578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0019-0578(07)60021-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Åström, K. J. and Hägglund, T., PID controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning. Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, 2nd edition, 1995.
2. Ender, D. B., Process control performance: Not as good as you think. Control Eng. 40, 180-190 (1993).
3. Åström, K. J., Panagopoulos, H., and Hägglund, T., Design of PI controllers based on non-convex optimization. Automatica 34, 585-601 (1998).
4. Besançon-Voda, A., Iterative auto-calibration of digital controllers: Methodology and applications. Control Eng. Pract. 6, 345-358 (1998).
5. Gorez, R., A survey of PID auto-tuning methods. Journal A 38, 3-10 (1997).
6. Ho, W. K., Hang, C. C., and Cao, L. S., Tuning of PID Controllers Based on Gain and Phase Margin Specifications. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress IFAC, Sydney, 1993, Vol. 5, 267-270.
7. Skogestad, S., Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J. Process Control 13, 291-309 (2003).
8. Wang, Q. G., Hang, C. C., and Bi, Q., Process frequency response estimation from relay feedback. Control Eng. Pract. 5, 1293-1302 (1997).
9. Kessler, C., Über die Vorausberechnung optimal abgestimmter Regelkreise Teil III. Die optimale Einstellung des Reglers nach dem Betragsoptimum. Regelungstechnik 3, 40-49 (1955).
10. Whiteley, A. L., Theory of servo systems, with particular reference to stabilization. J. IEE, Part II 93, 353-372 (1946).
11. Vrančić, D., Peng, Y., and Danz, C., A comparison between different PI controller tuning methods. Report DP-7286, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, 1995. Available on http://www-e2.ijs.si/Damir.Vrancic/bibliography.html
12. Vrančić, D., Peng, Y., and Strmčnik, S., A new PID controller tuning method based on multiple integrations. Control Eng. Pract. 7, 623-633 (1999).
13. Vrančić, D., Strmčnik, S., and Juričić, D., A magnitude optimum multiple integration method for filtered PID controller. Automatica 37, 1473-1479 (2001).
14. Umland, J. W. and Safiuddin, M., Magnitude and symmetric optimum criterion for the design of linear control systems: what is it and how does it compare with the others? IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 26, 489-497 (1990).
15. Preuss, H. P., Prozessmodellfreier PID-regler-Entwurf nach dem Betragsoptimum. Automatisierungstechnik 39, 15-22 (1991).
16. Deur, J., Perić, N., and Stajić, D., Design of reduced-order feedforward controller. Proceedings of the UKACC CONTROL'98 Conference, Swansea, 1998, 207-212.
17. Strejc, V., Auswertung der dynamischen Eigenschaften von Regelstrecken bei gemessenen Ein- und Ausgangssignalen allgemeiner Art. Z. Messen, Steuern, Regeln 3, 7-11 (1960).
18. Hanus, R., Determination of controllers parameters in the frequency domain. Journal A XVI (1975).
19. Hang, C. C., Åström, K. J., and Ho, W. K., Refinements of the Ziegler-Nichols tuning formula. IEE Proc.-D: Control Theory Appl. 138, 111-118 (1991).
20. Vrančić, D. and Strmčnik, S., Achieving optimal disturbance rejection by means of the magnitude optimum method. Proceedings of the CSCC'99, July 4-8, Athens, 1999, 3401-3406.
21. Vrečko, D., Vrančić, D., Juričić, D., and Strmčnik, S., A new modified Smith predictor: The concept, design and tuning. ISA Trans. 40(2), 111-121 (2001).