Job creation in California's enterprise zones: A comparison using a propensity score matching model

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 131-150

  O'Keefe, Suzanne ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742321687     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2003.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ArcView StreetMap, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 1997.
2. M. Boarnet, Enterprise zones and job creation, Economic Development Quarterly 15 (2001) 242-254.
3. M. Boarnet, W. Bogart, Enterprise zones and employment: evidence from New Jersey, Journal of Urban Economics 40 (1996) 198-215.
4. D. Bondonio, J. Engberg, Enterprise zones and local employment: evidence from the states' programs, Regional Science and Urban Economics 30 (2000) 519-549.
5. R. Bostic, Enterprise zones and the attraction of businesses and investment: the importance of implementation strategies and program incentives, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC, 1996.
6. California Employment Development Department, ES 202 data, Sacramento, 1991-1999.
7. California State Auditor, Trade and Commerce Agency: The Effectiveness of the Employment and Economic Incentive and Enterprise Zone Programs Cannot Be Determined, Bureau of State Audits, 1995.
8. California Trade and Commerce Agency, California Enterprise Zones: 1998 Annual Report, Lon Hatamiya, Secretary, 1999.
9. M. Dardia, Subsidizing redevelopment in California, Public Policy Institute of California, 1998.
10. R. Dehejia, S. Wahba, Causal effects in non-experimental studies: re-evaluating the evaluation of training programs, NBER working paper 6586, 1998.
11. D. Dowall, M. Beyeler, S. Wong, Evaluation of California's enterprise zone and employment and economic incentive programs, California policy seminar report, Univ. of California, 1994.
12. D.E. Dowall, An evaluation of California's enterprise zone programs, Economic Development Quarterly 10 (1996) 352-368.
13. J. Engberg, R. Greenbaum, State enterprise zones and local housing markets, Journal of Housing Research 10 (1999) 163-187.
14. R. Greenbaum, J. Engberg, An evaluation of state enterprise zone policies, Policy Studies Review 17 (2000) 29-46.
15. D.I. Levine, G. Painter, The costs of teenage out-of-wedlock childbearing: analysis with a within-school propensity score matching estimator, Working paper, 2000.
16. L.E. Papke, Tax policy and urban development: evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone program, Journal of Public Economics 54 (1994) 37-49.
17. P.R. Rosenbaum, D.B. Rubin, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrica 70 (1983) 41-55.
18. Small Business Administration, Microenterprise Program Survey of EDA Revolving Loan Fund Program, available from http://www.sba.gov/microenter/docsurvey.pdf, 2003.
19. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing, 1990 [United States]: Summary tape file 3A [Computer file]. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census [producer], 1992. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] (1993).
20. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Summaries of Joli Projects FY 1996, available from http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/joli/revised/sum96.htm, 1996.
21. M. Wilder, B. Rubin, Rhetoric versus reality: A review of studies on state enterprise zone programs, Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (1996) 472-492.