Friends Don't Let Friends Vote for Free Trade: The Dynamics of the Labor PAC Punishment Strategy over PNTR

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 441-448

  Jackson, David J ^a   Engel, Steven T ^b  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742321659     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290305600406     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Austen-Smith, David. 1993. "Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes." American Journal of Political Science 37: 799-833.
2. _. 1995. "Campaign Contributions and Access." American Political Science Review 89: 566-81.
3. Baird, Robert M., and Stuart E. Rosenbaum, eds. 1988. Philosophy of Punishment. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
4. Barone, Michael, and Richard E. Cohen. 2002. The Almanac of American Politics 2002. Washington DC: National Journal Group Inc.
5. Beck, Deborah, Paul Taylor, Jeffrey Stanger, and Douglas Rivlin 1997. Issue Advocacy Advertising During the 1996 Campaign. Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Public Policy Center
6. Burns, Peter F., Peter L. Francia, and Paul S. Herrnson. 2000. "Labor at Work: Union Campaign Activities and Legislative Payoffs in the U.S. House of Representatives." Social Science Quarterly 81: 507-22.
7. Cox, James. 2000. "CEOs Hail Passage, While Unions Vow Revenge." USA Today, 25 May, 5A.
8. Denzau, Arthur, and Michael Munger. 1986. "Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented." American Political Science Review 80: 89-106.
9. Eilperin, Juliet, and David S. Broder. 2000. "Despite UAW Threat, Low Risk Seen in China Vote." Washington Post, 24 May, A14.
10. Engel, Steven T., and David J. Jackson. 1998. "Wielding the Stick Instead of the Carrot: Labor PAC Punishment of Pro-NAFTA Democrats." Political Research Quarterly 51: 813-28.
11. Garland, David. 1990. Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Gopoian, J. David. 1984. "What Makes PACs Tick? An Analysis of the Allocation Patterns of Economic Interest Groups." American Journal of Political Science 28: 259-81.
13. _. 1985. "Change and continuity in Defense PAC Behavior." American Politics Quarterly 13: 297-322.
14. Gorr, Michael J., and Sterling Harwood. 1995. Crime and Punishment: Philosophic Explorations. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
15. Greenhouse, Steven. 2000. "U.S. Labor Leaders Push Hard to Kill China Trade Bill." New York Times, 14 May, Sect. 1, 1.
16. Grier, Kevin B., and Michael Munger. 1986. "The Impact of Legislator Attributes on Interest Group Campaign Contributions." Journal of Labor Research 7: 349-61.
17. _. 1991. "Committee Assignments, Constituent Preferences, and Campaign Contributions to House Incumbents." Economic Inquiry 29: 24-43.
18. _. 1993. "Comparing Interest Group PAC Contributions to House and Senate Incumbents, 1980-1986." Journal of Politics 55: 615-43.
19. Grier, Kevin, Michael Munger, and Gary Torrent. 1990. "Allocations Patterns of PAC Monies: The U.S. Senate." Public Choice 67: 111-28.
20. Herndon, James F. 1982. "Access, Record and Competition as Influences on Interest Group Contributions to Congressional Campaign." Journal of Politics 44: 996-1019.
21. Hurd, Richard, and Jeffery Sohl. 1992. "Strategic Diversity in Labor PAC Contribution Patterns." Social Science Journal 29: 65-86.
22. Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 3rd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
23. Kroszner, Randall S., and Thomas Stratmann. 1998. "Interest-Group Competition and the Organization of Congress: Theory and Evidence from Financial Services' Political Action Committees." The American Economic Review 88: 1163-87.
24. _. 2000. "Congressional Committees as Reputation-Building Mechanisms." Business and Politics 2: 35-52.
25. Langbein, Laura. 1986. "Money and Access: Some Empirical Evidence." Journal of Politics 48: 1052-62.
26. Loomis, Brudet A. 2002. "Members of Congress and the Two Permanent Campaigns." Extensions Spring: 4-8.
27. Matravers, Michael, ed. 1999. Punishment and Political Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
28. McCarty, Nolan, and Lawrence S. Rothenberg. 1996. "Commitment and the Campaign Contribution Contract." American Journal of Political Science 40: 872-904.
29. McGregor, Deborah, 2000. "Battle Heats Up Over China-U.S. Trade Vote." Financial Times (London), 16 May, 13.
30. _. 2000. "Dissidents Divided over Impact on Human Rights." Financial Times (London), 10 May, 13.
31. Rosin, Hanna, and Steve Mufson. 2000. "Religious Group Urges Rejection of China Bill." Washington Post, 2 May, A8.
32. Rudolph, Thomas J. 1999. "Corporate and Labor PAC Contributions in House Elections: Measuring the Effects of Majority Party Status." Journal of Politics 61: 195-206.
33. Sawyer, Jon, and Bill Lambrecht. 2000. "Gephardt Says He Doesn't Want to be Nominated for Vice-President; He Wants to Stay Focused on Winning Back Majority of House. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 19 July, A1.
34. Shyder, James M. Jr. 1992. "Long-Term Investing in Politicians; Or, Give Early, Give Often." Journal of Law and Economics 35: 15-43.
35. Stratmann, Thomas. 1992. "How Reelection Constituencies Matter: Evidence From Political Action Committees' Contributions and Congressional Voting." Journal Of Law and Economics 34: 603-35.
36. _. 1996. "Are Contributions Rational? Untangling Strategies of Political Action Committees." Journal of Political Economy 100: 647-64.
37. Swoboda, Frank, and Matthew Vita. 2000. "For Labor, China Trade Bill Makes Tough Litmus Test." Washington Post, 12 April, A2.
38. Vita, Matthew. 2000. "China Trade Vote Puts Some Democrats in a Quandary." Washington Post, 20 March, A4.
39. Walker, Nigel. 1991. Why Punish? Theories of Punishment Reassessed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Wawro, Gregory. 2001. "A Panel Probit Analysis of Campaign Contributions and Roll-Call Votes." American Journal of Political Science 45: 563-79.
41. Wright, John R. 1985. "PACs, Contributions and Roll Calls: An Organizational Perspective." American Political Science Review 79: 400-14.