Muscular adaptation to gradual advancement of the mandible

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 525-531

  Du, Xi ^a   Hägg, Urban ^b,c  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Class II; EMG; Functional appliance; Herbst; Prospective study

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MASSETER MUSCLE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; SCHOOL CHILD; TEMPORALIS MUSCLE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADAPTATION; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; MASTICATION; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; BITE FORCE; DENTAL OCCLUSION, CENTRIC; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; MASSETER MUSCLE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; TEMPORAL MUSCLE;

EID: 0642371536     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Moyers RE. Temporomandibular muscle contraction patterns in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions: an electromyographic analysis. Am J Orthod. 1949;35:837-857.
2. Pruzansky S. The application of electromyography to dental research. J Am Dent Assoc. 1952;44:49-68.
3. Perry HT Jr. Functional electromyography of the temporal and masseter muscles in Class II, division 1 malocclusion and excellent occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1955;25:49-58.
4. Moss JP. Function - fact or fiction? Am J Orthod. 1955;67:625-646.
5. Pancherz H. Activity of the temporal and masseter muscles in Class II, division 1 malocclusions. An electromyographic investigation. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:679-688.
6. Ahlgren J. An electromyographic analysis of the response to activator (Andresen-haupl) therapy. Odontol Revy. 1960;11:125-151.
7. Ahlgren J. The neurophysiologic principles of the Andresen method of functional jaw orthopedics: a critical analysis and new hypothesis. Swed Dent J. 1970;63:1-9.
8. Ingervall B, Bitsanis E. Function of masticatory muscles during the initial phase of activator treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:172-184.
9. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance - its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:1-20.
10. Leung DK, Hägg U. An electromyographic investigation of the first six months of progressive mandibular advancement of the Herbst appliance in adolescents. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:177-184.
11. Hägg U, Taranger J. Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth sport. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:299-309.
12. Hägg U, Du X, Rabie ABM. Initial and late treatment effects of Headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. Am J Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:477-485.
13. Hägg U, Du X, Rabie ABM, Bendeus M. What does headgear add to Herbst treatment and to retention? Semin Orthod. 2003;9:56-66.
14. Van Beek H. Overjet corrections by a combined headgear activator. Eur J Orthod. 1982;4:279-290.
15. Van Beek H. Combination headgear-activator. J Clin Orthod. 1984;18:185-189.
16. Jimenez ID. Electromyography of masticatory muscles in three-jaw registration positions. Am J Orthod. 1989;95:282-288.
17. Randow K, Carlsson K, Edlund J, Oberg T. The effect of an occlusal interference on the masticatory system. An experimental investigation. Odontol Revy. 1976;27:245-256.
18. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. Muscle activity in Class II division 1 malocclusions treated by bite jumping with the Herbst appliance. An electromyographic study. Am J Orthod. 1980;78:321-329.
19. Ingervall B, Thuer U. Temporal muscle activity during the first year of Class II, division 1 malocclusion treatment with an activator. Am J Orthod. 1991;99:361-368.
20. Pancherz H, Hansen H. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:215-228.
21. Bakke M, Paulsen HU. Herbst treatment in late adolescence: clinical, electromyographic and radiographic analysis of one case. Eur J Orthod. 1989;1:397-407.
22. Latif A. An electromyographic study of the temporalis muscle in normal persons during selected positions and movements of the mandible. Am J Orthod. 1978;43:577-591.
23. Ahlgren J. Early and late electromyographic response to treatment with activators. Am. J. Orthod. 1978;74:88-93.
24. Ingervall B, Thilander B. Relation between facial morphology and activity of the masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabil. 1974;1:131-147.
25. Pancherz H, Anehus M. Masticatory function after activator treatment. An analysis of masticatory efficiency, occlusal contact conditions and EMG activity. Acta Odontol Scand. 1978;36:309-316.
26. al-Quaran FA, Lyons MF. The immediate effect of hard and soft splints on the EMG activity of the masseter and temporalis muscles. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:559-563.
27. Yuen SW, Hwang JC, Poon PW. Changes in power spectrum of electromyograms of masseter and anterior temporal muscles during functional appliance therapy in children. Am J Orthod. 1990;97:301-307.
28. Miles TS, Nordström MA, Turker KS. Length-related changes in activation threshold and waveform of motor units in human masseter muscle. J Physiol Lond. 1986;370:457-465.
29. Carels C, van Steenberghe D. Changes in neuromuscular reflexes in the masseter muscles during functional jaw orthopedic treatment in children. Am J Orthod. 1986;90:410-419.
30. Sessle BJ, Woodside DG, Bourque P, Gurza S, Powell G, Voudouris J, Metaxas A, Altuna G. Effect of functional appliances on jaw muscle activity. Am J Orthod. 1990;98:222-230.
31. Moyers RE. An electromyographic analysis of certain muscles involved in temporomandibular movement. Am J Orthod. 1959;36:481-515.
32. Gianelly AA, Goldman HM. Tooth Movement. Biologic Basis of Orthodontics. Philadephia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1971:116-204.
33. Greenfield BE, Wyke BD. Electromyographic studies of some of the muscles of mastication. Br Dent J. 1956;100:129-143.
34. Pancherz H, Winnberg A. Reliability of EMG registrations. A quantitative analysis of masseter muscle activity. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981;21:67-81.
35. Burdette BH, Gale EN. Reliability of surface electromyography of the masseteric and anterior temporal areas. Arch Oral Biol. 1990;35:747-751.
36. Cerere F, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Is quantitative electromyography reliable? J Orafac Pain. 1996;10:38-47.