Postcementation hypersensitivity: Scientific data versus dentists' perceptions

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 73-81

  Rosenstiel, Stephen F ^a   Rashid, Robert G ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cementation; Crowns; Internet; Sensitivity; Survey

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CEMENTATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DESICCATION; DISEASE CONTROL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SURVEY; HYPERSENSITIVITY; INTERNET; REVIEW; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH OCCLUSION; VALIDATION PROCESS; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PREVALENCE; TOOTH PAIN;

TOOTH CEMENT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CEMENTATION; CROWNS; DATA COLLECTION; DENTAL CEMENTS; HUMANS; PREVALENCE; TOOTH PREPARATION; TOOTHACHE;

EID: 0642311347     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00010-X     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brännström M: Reducing the risk of sensitivity and pulpal complications after the placement of crowns and fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 1996;27:673-678
2. Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller HG, et al: Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:159-162
3. Johnson GH, Powell LV, DeRouen TA: Evaluation and control of post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: Zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:38-46
4. Bebermeyer RD, Berg JH: Comparison of patient-perceived postcementation sensitivity with glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate cements. Quintessence Int 1994;25:209-214
5. Jokstad A, Mjor I: Ten years' clinical evaluation of three luting cements. J Dent 1996;24:309-315
6. Palmqvist S, Swartz B: Artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures 18 to 23 years after placement. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:279-285
7. Valderhaug J, Jokstad A, Ambjornsen E, et al: Assessment of the periapical and clinical status of crowned teeth over 25 years. J Dent 1997;25:97-105
8. Metz JE, Brackett WW: Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 8 years in a general practice. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:13-15
9. Karlsson S: A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13:423-432
10. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, et al: Postoperative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:321-329
11. Camps J, Dejou J, Remusat M, et al: Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations. Dent Mater 2000;16:432-440
12. Hadi Z, Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG: A comparison of post-treatment sensitivity using adhesive cavity liner vs. conventional cavity varnish. J Dent Res 1998;77:272(abstr)
13. Zach L, Cohen G: Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1965;19:515-530
14. Baldissara P, Catapano S, Scotti R: Clinical and histological evaluation of thermal injury thresholds in human teeth: A preliminary study. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:791-801
15. Brännström M: The effect of dentin desiccation and aspirated odontoblasts on the pulp. J Prosthet Dent 1968;20:165-171
16. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment: Reported sensitivity to glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;109:476
17. Spierings TA, Peters MC, Plasschaert AJ: Thermal trauma to teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:123-129
18. The Dental Advisor 1998;15:(8)9
19. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL: Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639
20. Brännström M, Nyborg H: Cavity treatment with a microbicidal fluoride solution: Growth of bacteria and effect on the pulp. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:303-310
21. Watts A: Bacterial contamination and the toxicity of silicate and zinc phosphate cements. Br Dent J 1979;146:7-13
22. Rosenstiel SF, Land ML, Fujimoto J: Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics (ed 3). St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 2001, p 772
23. Quarnstrom F, Collier N, McDade E, et al: A randomized clinical trial of agents to reduce sensitivity after crown cementation. Gen Dent 1998;46:68-74
24. Land MF, Rosenstiel SF, Sandrik JL: Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:4-7
25. Land MF, Couri CC, Johnston WM: Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:477-482
26. Lam CW, Wilson PR: Crown cementation and pulpal health. Int Endod J 1999;32:249-256
27. Suzuki S: Clinical evaluation of a new resin composite crown system to eliminate postoperative sensitivity. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2000;20:498-509
28. Mahler DB, Engle JH: Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in class I and II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131: 43-49
29. Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moorhead JE: Amalgam restorations: Postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth. Oper Dent 1999;24:377-383
30. Kennington LB, Davis RD, Murchison DF, et al: Short-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent 1998;11:177-180
31. Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, et al: Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:459-465
32. Christensen GJ: Resin cements and postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1197-1199
33. Akpata ES, Sadiq W: Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites. Am J Dent 2001;14:34-38