Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1193-1201

  McClure, E K ^a   Scanga, J A ^a,b   Belk, K E ^a   Smith, G C ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b 12A Animal Science Bldg ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Carcass Composition; Instrumentation; Lean; Pork

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; FEMALE; FOOD INDUSTRY; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MEAT; MEAT INDUSTRY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWINE; VIDEORECORDING;

ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; FEMALE; FOOD-PROCESSING INDUSTRY; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MEAT; MEAT-PACKING INDUSTRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0642284939     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/2003.8151193x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. AMSA. 2001. Meat Evaluation Handbook. Am. Meat Sci. Assoc., Savoy, IL.
2. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Assoc. of Offic. Anal. Chem., Arlington, VA.
3. Boland, M. A., K. A. Foster, J. T. Akridge, and J. C. Forrest. 1994. Economic analysis of using electromagnetic scanning in a packing plant. Pages 69-72 in Purdue Univ. Swine Day Rep., West Lafayette, IN.
4. Brady, A. S., K. E. Belk, S. B. LeValley, J. A. Scanga, J. D. Tatum, and G. C. Smith. 2003. An evaluation of the Lamb Vision System as a predictor of lamb carcass red meat yield percentage. Sheep Goat Res. J. (In press).
5. Cannell, R. C., K. E. Belk, J. D. Tatum, J. W. Wise, P. L. Chapman, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith. 2002. Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system (Computer Vision System) to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1195-1201.
6. Forrest, J. C., C. H. Kuei, M. W. Orcutt, A. P. Schinckel, J. R. Stouffer, and M. D. Judge. 1989. A review of potential new methods of on-line pork carcass evaluation. J. Anim. Sci. 67:2164-2170.
7. Higbie, A. D., T. D. Bidner, J. O. Matthews, L. L. Southern, T. G. Page, M. A. Persica, M. B. Sanders, and C. J. Monlezun. 2002. Prediction of swine carcass composition by total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC). J. Anim. Sci. 80:113-122.
8. Liu, Y., and J. R. Stouffer. 1995. Pork carcass evaluation with an automated and computerized ultrasonic system. J. Anim. Sci. 73:29-38.
9. NPPC. 2000. Pork Composition and Quality Assessment Measures. Natl. Pork Prod. Council, Des Moines, IA.
10. USDA. 1985. United States Standards for Grades of Pork Carcasses. USDA-AMS Livestock and Seed Division, Washington, DC.
11. USDA. 1997. Institutional Meat Purchasing Specifications: Series-400, Pork. USDA-AMS Livestock and Seed Division, Washington, DC.
12. USDA. 2002. National Daily Hog and Pork Summary. December 31, 2002. USDA-AMS Livestock and Seed Division, Washington, DC.