Assessment of communicating systems on the basis of an ecological conceptual framework

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 42, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages

  Borg, Erik ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assessment; Audiology; Communication; Ecology; Hearing; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; ECOSYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEARING; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; ECOLOGY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN RELATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PHILOSOPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SYSTEMS THEORY;

AUDIOLOGY; COMMUNICATION; DEAFNESS; ECOLOGY; HEARING; HOLISTIC HEALTH; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SYSTEMS THEORY;

EID: 0642282105     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992020309074621     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Bergman, B. & Klefsjö, B. (1994). Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
2. Borg, E. (1998). Audiology in an ecological perspective-development of a conceptual framework. Scandinavian Audiology, Suppl 49, 132-139.
3. Borg, E. (2000). Ecological aspects of auditory rehabilitation. Acta OtoLaryngologica, 120, 232-241.
4. Borg, E., Danermark, B. & Borg, B. (2002a). Behavioural awareness, interaction and counselling education in audiological rehabilitation. Development of methods in application in a pilot study. International Journal of Audiology, 41, 308-322.
5. Borg, E., Risberg, A., McAllister, R., Undemar, B.-M., Edquist, G., Reinholdson, A.-C., et al (2002b). Language development in hearing-impaired children. Establishment of a reference material for a 'Language test for hearing-impaired children', LATHIC. International Journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology, 65, 15-26.
6. Carson, A.J. & Pichora-Fuller, M.K. (1997). Health promotion and audiology: the community-clinic link. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 30, 29-51.
7. Clements, F.E. (1916). Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 242.
8. Cox, R. (2000). Editorial Ear and Hearing, 21, 1S.
9. Cox, R., Hyde, M., Gatehouse, S., Noble, W., Dillon, H., Bentler, R., et al (2000). Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear and Hearing, 21, 106S-115S.
10. Dillon, H., James, A. & Ginis, J. (1997). Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship or several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8, 27-43.
11. Dunster, J. & Dunster, K. (1996). Dictionary of natural resource management. Wollingford: CAB International.
12. Erber, N.P. (1996). Communication therapy for adults with sensory loss. Melbourne: Claves Publishing.
13. Foster, S. (1998). Communication as social engagement: implications for interactions between deaf and hearing persons. Scandinavian Audiology, 27(suppl 49), 116-124.
14. Gatehouse, S. (1999). Hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client centred outcome measure for hearing-aid services. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 80-103.
15. Haeckel, E. (1866). Generelle Morphologie des Organismen. Berlin: Verlag von Georg Raimer.
16. Hallberg, L.-M. (1996). Occupational hearing loss: coping and family life. Scandinavian Audiology, 25(suppl 43), 25-33.
17. Heft, H. (Ed.) (2001). Ecological psychology in contact. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Johnson, C.E. & Pichora-Fuller, M.K. (1994). How communication goals may alter handicap. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 18, 235-242.
19. Liebig, J. (1842). Die organische Chemie in Ihrer Anwendung auf Physiologie und Pathologie. Braunschweig: Friedrich Bieweg u. Sohn.
20. Newman, C.W. & Jacobson, G.P. (1993). Self-assessment scales in audiology. Seminars in Hearing, 14, 299-390.
21. Noble, W. (1998). Self-assessment of hearing and related functions. London: Whurr.
22. Noble, W. & Hétu, R. (1994). An ecological approach to disability and handicap in relation to impaired hearing. Audiology, 33, 117-126.
23. Pichora-Fuller, M.K., Johnson, C.E. & Roodenburg, K.E.J. (1998). The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap: balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. Special Issue on Intergenerational and Aging Issues. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 99-119.
24. Pichora-Fuller, M.K. & Robertson, L.F. (1994). Hard of hearing residents in a home for the aged. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 18, 278-288.
25. Pichora-Fuller, M.K. & Robertson, L.F. (1997). Planning and evaluation of a rehabilitation programme in a home for the aged: use of hearing aids and assistive listening devices. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 21, 174-186.
26. Szcsepura, A. & Kankaanpää, J. (Eds.). Assessment of health care technologies. Case studies, key concepts and strategic issues. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Wessels, R., de Witte, L., Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., Persson, J., Oberg, B., et al (2000). IPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology. Technology and Disability, 13, 105-115.