Ecological aspects of auditory rehabilitation

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 234-241

  Borg, Erik ^a,b,c,d  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d Ahls?n Research Institute   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Acoustic environment; Communication; Ears; Ecology; Hearing impairment; Language

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

COMMUNICATION; DEAFNESS; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0034157664     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/000164800750001008     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
2. Winograd E, Fivush R, Hirst W. Ecological approaches to cognition. Emory Symposium and Cognition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Publishers, 1999.
3. Noble W. Hearing, hearing impairment, and the audible world: a theoretical essay. Audiology 1983; 22: 325-38.
4. Foster S, DeCaro P. An ecological model of social interaction between deaf and hearing students within a postsecondary educational setting. Disabil Handicap Soc 1991; 6: 181-220.
5. Borg E. Audiology in an ecological perspective - development of a conceptual framework. Scand Audiol 1998; 27 Suppl 49: 132-9.
6. Cannon WB. Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiol Rev 1929; 9: 399.
7. Bernard C. Lecons sur les phénomènes de la vie communes aux animaux et aux végétaux, Paris, 1879, B. Paris: Ballière et Fils, 1858.
8. Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL. Quality of American life; perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.
9. Schwarz N, Starck F. Evaluating one's life: a judgement model of subjective well-being. In: Stark F, Argyle M, Schwarz N, eds. Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991: 27-47.
10. Canlon B, Borg E, Flock A. Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus. Hear Res 1988; 34: 197-200.
11. Gatehouse S. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. J Acad Audiol 1993; 4: 296-306.
12. Borg E, Wilson M, Samuelsson E. Towards an ecological audiology: stereophonic listening chamber and acoustic environmental tests. Scand Audiol 1998; 27: 195-206.
13. Samuelsson E, Borg E. Impairment and handicap in a homogenous group of hearing impaired young adults. In preparation.
14. Antonson S. Hörselskadade i högskolestudier, Hinder och möjligheter. Academic thesis, Institute of Pediatrics and Psychology, Linköpings University, 1998.
15. Borg E, Samuelsson E, Danermark B, Rönnberg J. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students. Scand Audiol 1999; 28 Suppl 50: 1-36.
16. Trychin S. Coping with hearing loss. Semin Hear 1997; 18: 77-86.
17. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Coping and adption. In: Gentry WD, ed. 'Handbook of behavioural medicine. New York: The Guilford Press 1984; 8: 282-325.
18. Borg E, Rönnberg J, Neovius L, Kjellander M. Monoitoring the environment: sound localization equipment for deaf-blind people. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1999; 119: 146-9.
19. Borg E, Danermark B, Borg B. Behavioural awareness, interaction and education in audiological rehabiliation. 1999, in press.