BREASTAID: Clinical Results from Early Development of a Clinical Decision Rule for Palpable Solid Breast Masses

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 238, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 728-737

  Osuch, Janet Rose ^a   Reeves, Mathew J ^a   Pathak, Dorothy R ^a   Kinchelow, Tosca ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MORBIDITY; PALPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK FACTOR; SOLID TUMOR; VALIDATION PROCESS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVALUATION; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0642277216     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094446.78844.ae     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Leis HP Jr. Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer. J Reprod Med. 1975;14: 231-240.
2. Seltzer MH. The significance of breast complaints as correlated with age and breast cancer. Am Surg. 1992;58:413-417.
3. Reeves M, Newcomb P, Remington P, et al. Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988-1990. Cancer Causes Control. 1995;6:103-111.
4. Seltzer MH. Preoperative prediction of open breast biopsy results. Cancer. 1997;79:1822-1827.
5. Burkhardt JH, Sunshine JH. Core-needle and surgical breast biopsy: comparison of three methods of assessing cost. Radiology. 1999;212: 181-188.
6. Physician's Insurance Association of America. Breast Cancer Study. Physician's Insurance Association of America; 1995, Washington, DC.
7. Vetto J, Pommier R, Schmidt W, et al. Use of the 'triple test' for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings. Am J Surg. 1995;169:519-522.
8. Layfield LJ. Can fine-needle aspiration replace open biopsy in the diagnosis of palpable breast lesions? [editorial]. Am J Clin Pathol. 1992;98:145-147.
9. Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Cariaggi MP. Performance of fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: multicenter study of 23,063 aspirates in ten Italian laboratories. Tumori. 1995;81:13-17.
10. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, et al. Clinical prediction rules: applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:793-799.
11. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules: a review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997;277:488-494.
12. McGinn TG, Guyatt GH, Wyer PC, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII. How to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 2000;284:79-84.
13. Colditz GA, Frazier AL. Models of breast cancer show that risk is set by events of early life: prevention efforts must shift focus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995;4:567-571.
14. Holleb AI. The technique of breast examination. CA Cancer J Clin. 1966;16:7-9.
15. Haagenson C. Physician's role in the detection and diagnosis of breast disease. In: Haagenson C, ed. Diseases of the Breast, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1986.
16. American College of Radiology (ACR). Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 3rd edition. Reston [VA]: American College of Radiology. 1998.
17. Horobin JM, Matthew BM, Preece PE, et al. Effects of fine needle aspiration on subsequent mammograms. Br J Surg. 1992;79:52-54.
18. Sickles EA, Klein DL, Goodson WH, et al. Mammography after needle aspiration of palpable breast masses. Am J Surg. 1983;145:395.
19. Martin H, Ellis E. Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg. 1930;92:169-181.
20. Roberts JC, Rainsbury RM. 'Tactile sensation': a new clinical sign during fine needle aspiration of breast lumps. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:136-138.
21. Kline TS, Kline IK. Guides to Clinical Aspiration Biopsy: Breast. New York: Igaku-Shoin; 1989.
22. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittees. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;16:295-311.
23. Weinstein M, Feinberg H. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1980.
24. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, et al. Clinical Epidemiology. A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown; 1991.
25. Metz CE. ROCKIT, vol. 2002, ed. version 0.9B. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1998.
26. Renshaw AA. Accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration using receiver operator characteristic curves. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116:477-482.
27. Morris A, Pommier R, Schmidt W, et al. Accurate evaluation of palpable breast masses by the triple test score. Arch Surg. 1998;133:930-934.
28. Morris KT, Pommier RF, Morris A, et al. Usefulness of the triple test score for palpable breast masses; discussion 1012-1013. Arch Surg. 2001;136:1008-1012.
29. Di Pietro S, Fariselli G, Bandieramonte G, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of the clinical-radiological-cytological triad in solid breast lumps: results of a second prospective study on 631 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1987; 13: 335-340.
30. Martelli G, Pilotti S, Coopmans de Yoldi G, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of physical examination, mammography, fine needle aspiration cytology (triple-test) in solid breast lumps: an analysis of 1708 consecutive cases. Tumori. 1990;76:476-479.
31. Osuch J, Bonham VL. Medicolegal pitfalls in breast cancer diagnosis and management. In: Jatoi I, ed. Manual on Breast Diseases. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002;519-538.
32. Hermansen C, Skovgaard Poulsen H, Jensen J, et al. Palpable breast tumours: 'triple diagnosis' and operative strategy. Results of a prospective study. Acta Chir Scand. 1984;150:625-628.
33. Kreuzer G, Boquoi E. Aspiration biopsy cytology, mammography and clinical exploration: a modern setup in the diagnosis of tumors of the breast. Acta Cytol. 1976;20:319-323.
34. Horgan PG, Waldron D, Mooney E, et al. The role of aspiration cytologic examination in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172:290-292.