Pulmonary nodules: Dosimetric and clinical studies at low dose multidetector CT;Évaluation dosimétrique en exploration TDM thoracique multibarrette faible dose dans la détection des nodules pulmonaires

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 84, Issue 4 I, 2003, Pages 399-404

  Hetmaniak, Y ^a   Bard, J J ^b   Albuisson, E ^c   Courthaliac, C ^a   Reynier, C ^a   Lhoste Trouilloud, A ^a   Crost, E ^a   Petitcolin, V ^a   Caillaud, D ^a   Michel, J L ^a,d  

^a SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

^b CENTRE JEAN PERRIN   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF CLERMONT FERRAND   (France)

Author keywords

Chest; Dosimetry; Low dose; Lung, nodule; Multidetector CT; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; LUNG NODULE; RADIATION DETECTION; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION MONITORING; SCREENING; THERMOLUMINESCENCE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; BODY BURDEN; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; LUNG; LUNG COIN LESION; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY;

AGED; BODY BURDEN; COIN LESION, PULMONARY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 0642275068     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kaneko M, Kusumoto M, Kobayashi T et al. Computed Tomography screening for lung carcinoma in Japan. Cancer 2000;89:2485-88.
2. Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project. Cancer 2001;92:153-9.
3. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Arahata S, et al. Lung cancer screening: minimum tube current required for helical CT. Radiology 2000;215:175-83.
4. Site INTERNET: www.gemedicalsystem.com
5. Hui H, David H, Denis Foley W et al. Four multi-detector row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage. Radiology 2000;215:55-62.
6. Hu h. Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys 1999;26:5-18.
7. Mc Coullough C, Zink F. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys 1999;26:2223-30.
8. Cordoliani YS, Hazebroucq V, Sarrazin JL. Irradiation et bonne pratique en scanner hélicoïdal. Cours de perfectionnement post universitaire JFR 1998.
9. Boyer B, Le Marec E, Le Bruno B et al. Pitch et qualité d'image. Feuillets de Radiologie 1999;39:371-8.
10. Blum B, Feldman L, Bresler F, et al. Intéret du calcul du coefficient kappa dans L'évaluation d'une méthode d'imagerie. J Radiol 1995;76:441-3.
11. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal sales. Educ Psychol Measure 1960;20:37-46.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurements of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
13. Drederich S, Lenzenz H, Windmann R et al. Pulmonary nodules: expérimental and clinical studies at low dose CT. Radiology 1999;213:289-98.
14. Site INTERNET: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eassa.cordo/SFROPRI/index.htm
15. Gartenschlager M, Schweden F, Gast K, et al. Pulmonary nodules: detection with low-dose vs conventional-dose spiral CT. Eur Radiol 1998;8:609-14.
16. Itoh S, Koyama S, Ikeda M, et al. Further reduction of radiation dose in helical CT for lung cancer screening using small tube current and a newly designed filter. J Thorac Imaging 2001;16:81-8.
17. Rusinek H, Naidich D, Mc Guinness G et al. Pulmonary nodule detection: lowdose versus conventionnal CT. Radiology 1998;209:243-9.
18. Hart D, Hillier Mc, Wall BF et al. Dose to patients from medical X-ray examinations in th UK. NRPB-R289, London, HMSO, 1996.
19. Bouhnik H, Bard JJ, Chauvadra J et al. Evaluation des doses délivrées au cours d'examens radiologiques. Radioprotection 1998;23:27.
20. Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M et al. Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung cancer: analysis of CT findings. Br J Cancer 2001;84:25-32.
21. Wright A, Collie D, Williams J et al. Pulmonary nodules: effect on detection of spiral CT pitch. Radiology 1996;199:837-41.
22. Scheck R, Coppenrath E, Kellner M et al. Radiation dose and image quality in spiral computed tomography: multicentre evaluation at six institutions. Br J Radiol 1998;71:734-44.