Pulmonary nodules: Effect on detection of spiral CT pitch

Radiology

Volumn 199, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 837-841

  Wright, Andrew R ^a   Collie, Donald A ^a   Williams, Jerry R ^a   Hashemi Malayeri, Bijan ^a   Stevenson, Allan J M ^a   Turnbull, Colin M ^a  

^a WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Lung neoplasms, CT; Lung neoplasms, staging; Lung, nodule

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BREATH HOLDING; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LUNG METASTASIS; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0030007682     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8638014     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kagan AR, Steckel RJ. Radiologic contributions to cancer management: lung metastases. AJR 1986; 147:473-476.
2. Davis SD. CT evaluation for pulmonary metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancy. Radiology 1991; 180:1-12.
3. Krudy AG, Doppman JL, Herdt JR. Failure to detect a 1.5 cm lung nodule by chest computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6:1178-1180.
4. Shaffer K, Pugatch RD. Small pulmonary nodules: dynamic CT with a single-breath technique. Radiology 1989; 173:567-568.
5. Steckel RJ, Kagan AR. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of metastatic disease or local tumour extension with modern imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:818-823.
6. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 1990; 176:181-183.
7. Vock P, Soucek M, Daepp M, Kalender WA. Lung: spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique. Radiology 1990; 176:864-867.
8. Costello P, Anderson W, Blume D. Pulmonary nodule: evaluation with spiral volumetric CT. Radiology 1991; 179:875-876.
9. Heywang-Koebrunner SH Jr, Lommatzsch B Sr, Fink U, Mayr B Jr. Comparison of spiral and conventional CT in the detection of pulmonary nodules (abstr). Radiology 1992; 185(P):131.
10. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Giraud F, Marquette CH. Pulmonary nodules: detection with thick-section spiral CT versus conventional CT. Radiology 1993; 187:513-520.
11. Collie DA, Wright AR, Williams JR, Hashemi-Malayeri B, Stevenson AJM, Turnbull CM. Comparison of spiral-acquisition computed tomography and conventional computed tomography in the assessment of pulmonary metastatic disease. Br J Radiol 1994; 67:436-444.
12. Friese SA, Rieber A, Fleiter T, Brambs HJ, Claussen CD. Pulmonary nodules in spiral volumetric and single section computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18:48-51.
13. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchai G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 1992; 185:29-35.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
15. Costello P, Dupuy DE, Naporano A. Spiral CT of the thorax with increased table speed: comparative study (abstr). Radiology 1992; 185(P):132.
16. Chalmers N, Best JJK. The significance of pulmonary nodules detected by CT but not by chest radiography in tumour staging. Clin Radiol 1991; 44:410-412.
17. Kalender WA, Polacin A, Suss C. A comparison of conventional and spiral CT: an experimental study on the detection of spherical lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:167-176.
18. Buckley JA, Scott WW Jr, Siegelman SS, et al. Pulmonary nodules: effect of increased data sampling on detection with spiral CT and confidence in diagnosis. Radiology 1995; 196:395-400.
19. Crow J, Slavin G, Kreel L Pulmonary metastasis: a pathologic and radiologic study. Cancer 1981; 47:2595-2602.
20. Libshitz HI, North LB. Pulmonary metastases. Radiol Clin North Am 1982; 20:437-451.