First-principles calculations of stress induced by gas adsorption on Pt(111)

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 2175-2182

  Feibelman, Peter J ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0642272735     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.2175     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. For reviews, see R. C. Cammarata, Prog. Surf. Sci. 46, 1 (1994).
2. H. Ibach, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12, 2240 (1994); Surf. Sci. Rep. (to be published).
3. J. V. Barth, H. Brune, G. Ertl, and R. J. Behm, Phys. Rev. B 42, 9307 (1990); D. D. Chambliss and R. J. Wilson (unpublished).
4. A. R. Sandy, S. G. J. Mochrie, D. M. Zehner, G. Grübel, K. G. Huang, and D. Gibbs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2192 (1992).
5. M. Bott, M. Hohage, T. Michely, and G. Comsa, 70, 1489 (1993).
6. R. J. Needs, M. J. Godfrey, and M. Mansfield, Surf. Sci. 242, 215 (1991).
7. S. Narasimhan and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1564 (1992).
8. 69, 2455 (1992).
9. (a) J. E. Müller, M. Wuttig, and H. Ibach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1583 (1986).
10. (b) F. Sette, T. Hashizume, F. Comin, A. A. MacDowell, and P. H. Citrin, 61, 1384 (1988).
11. (c) P. J. Feibelman, ibid.Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2488 (1989).
12. R. J. Needs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 53 (1987).
13. R. D. Meade and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1404 (1989).
14. R. J. Needs and M. J. Godfrey, Phys. Rev. B 42, 10 933 (1990).
15. P. J. Feibelman, Phys. Rev. B 51, 17 867 (1995).
16. A success in the realm of semiconductor surfaces concerns the stress anisotropy on Si(001). See A. Garcia and J. Northrup, Phys. Rev. B 48, 17 350 (1993).
17. J. Dabrowski, E. Pehlke, and M. Scheffler, 49, 4790 (1994).
18. Early measurements of average, absolute stress, based on observing the lattice parameter in small particles, were reported by C. W. Mays, J. S. Vermaak, and D. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, Surf. Sci. 12, 134 (1968).
19. H. J. Wassermann and J. S. Vermaak, 22, 164 (1970).
20. 32, 168 (1972). These measurements were not carried out under UHV conditions.
21. R. E. Martinez, W. M. Augustyniak, and J. A. Golovchenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1035 (1990).
22. A. J. Schell-Sorokin and R. M. Tromp, 64, 1039 (1990).
23. D. Sander and H. Ibach, Phys. Rev. B 43, 4263 (1991).
24. J. A. Floro and E. Chason, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3830 (1996).
25. M. Hohage, M. Morgenstern, T. Michely, and G. Comsa (unpublished);T. Michely (private communication).
26. M. P. Sears, P. A. Schultz, and P. J. Feibelman (unpublished).
27. also, W. E. Pickett, Comput. Phys. Rep. 9, 115 (1989).
28. D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980)
29. as parametrized by J. Perdew and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981).
30. D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2980 (1989).
31. N. Troullier and J. L. Martins, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991).
32. K. Mortenson, F. Besenbacher, I. Stensgaard, and C. Klink, Surf. Sci. 211/212, 813 (1989).
33. J. L. Gland and V. N. Korchak, Surf. Sci. 75, 733 (1978).
34. N. Materer, U. Starke, A. Barbieri, R. Döll, K. Heinz, M. A. Van Hove, and G. A. Somorjai, Surf. Sci. 325, 207 (1995).
35. For an introduction to the LAPW method, see O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3060 (1975).
36. D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 662 (1979).
37. L. F. Mattheiss and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B 33, 823 (1986).
38. P. J. Feibelman, S. Esch, and T. Michely, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2257 (1996).
39. R. Smoluchowski, Phys. Rev. 60, 661 (1941).
40. O. H. Nielsen and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3780 (1985).
41. 32, 3792 (1995).
42. P. J. Feilbelman, Phys. Rev. B 44, 3916 (1991).
43. G. N. Derry and J.-Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 39, 1940 (1989).
44. D. H. Parker, M. E. Bartram, and B. E. Koel, Surf. Sci. 217, 489 (1989).
45. G. N. Derry and P. N. Ross, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 2775 (1985).
46. E. Bøgh and I. Stensgaard, Phys. Lett. 65A, 357 (1978).
47. J. A. Davies, D. P. Jackson, P. R. Norton, D. E. Posner, and W. N. Unertl, Solid State Commun. 34, 41 (1980).
48. K. Christmann, G. Ertl, and T. Pignet, Surf. Sci. 54, 365 (1976).
49. P. J. Feibelman and D. R. Hamann, Surf. Sci. 182, 411 (1987). The Pt film in this calculation was only 3 Pt layers thick, which may have distorted the work function result somewhat.
50. H. Niehus and G. Comsa, Surf. Sci. 102, L14 (1981).
51. H. P. Bonzel, A. M. Franken and G. Pirug, ibid.Surf. Sci. 104, 625 (1981).
52. M. Mundschau and R. Vanselow, ibid.Surf. Sci. 157, 87 (1985).
53. K. Wandelt (private communication).
54. R. J. Needs and M. Mansfield, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 1, 7555 (1989). In this calculation, the Pt surface was represented by an ideal four-layer slab, and the plane-wave basis was relatively small.
55. A. Grossmann, W. Erley, and H. Ibach, Surf. Rev. Lett. 2, 543 (1995) actually report a stress change of (Formula presented) However, this value, as well as the stress changes reported in Refs. 16, were derived from data on the assumption of two-dimensional, adsorbate-induced crystal bending. Recent experiments testing this assumption show that it is incorrect.
56. Crystal clamping in the experiments performed by Grossmann and Sander forced the crystal bending to be one-dimensional [see A. Grossmann, W. Erley, J. B. Hannon, and H. Ibach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3587 (1997); H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. Rep. (to be published)].The consequence is that the reported stress changes are to be revised substantially downward. In the case of Grossmann, Erley, and Ibach’s O/Pt(111) measurements, the correction factor is 0.667 [H. Ibach (private communication)], and thus the measured stress change for the (Formula presented) saturation coverage is not (Formula presented) but (Formula presented)
57. L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY, 1960), 3rd ed.
58. On graphite, average bond lengths for (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) are 2.45 and 2.66 Å, according to the in-air, STM study of U. Muller, K. Sattler, J. Xhie, N. Venkateswaran, and G. Raina, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 829 (1991). These values are appreciably smaller than the nearest-neighbor distance, 2.77 Å, in fcc Pt, and increase with the number of nearest neighbors.
59. For Ni, which occupies the same column in the Periodic Table, the dimer bond length is 2.155 Å, according to J. C. Pinegar, J. D. Langenberg, C. A. Arrington, E. M. Spain, and M. D. Morse, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 666 (1995), compared to a nearest-neighbor distance of 2.49 Å in the fcc crystal.
60. See, e.g., V. Fiorentini, M. Methfessel, and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1051 (1993). They argue that the quasihexagonal reconstruction of Pt(001) as against the nonreconstruction of Pd(001) is the consequence of enhanced tensile stress for Pt(001) associated with relative depletion of its antibonding (Formula presented) bands.
61. For another example, the relaxation of the outermost layer separation of Ni(111) is consistent with zero, according to the ion scattering results of T. Narusawa, W. M. Gibson, and E. Tornqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 417 (1981).
62. The LEED analysis of J. E. Demuth, P. M. Marcus, and D. W. Jepsen, Phys. Rev. B 11, 1460 (1975) yields at at best a small inward relaxation (Formula presented) Should we then expect vanishing surface stress for Ni(111)?
63. G. K. Wertheim, D. M. Riffe, and P. H. Citrin, Phys. Rev. B 49, 4834 (1994).
64. R. Stumpf and P. J. Feibelman (unpublished).
65. R. J. Needs and G. Rajagopal, Surf. Sci. 372, 179 (1997).