Gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments

Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 313-320

  Bailenson, Jeremy N ^a   Beall, Andrew C ^b   Blascovich, Jim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Avatars; Copresence; Mutual gaze; Organizational behaviour; Presence; Video conferencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 0442267971     PISSN: 10498907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/vis.297     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pusch M, Loomis JM. Judging another person's facing direction using peripheral vision. Journal of Vision 2001; 1.
2. Argyle M, Dean J. Eye contact, distance, and affiliation. Sociometry 1965; 28(1): 289-304.
3. Kendon A. Studies in the Behaviour of Social Interaction. Indiana University: Bloomington, IN, 1977.
4. Vertegaal R, Slagter R, van der Veer G, Nijholt A. Eye gaze patterns in conversations: there is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes. SIGCHI '01, Seattle, WA, 2000.
5. Cassel J, Bickmore T, Billinghurst M, Campbell L, Chang K, Vilhjálmsson H, Yan H. Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea. In Proceedings of CHI '99, Association for Computing Machinery. ACM Press: New York, 1999; pp 520-527.
6. Perlin K, Goldberg A. Improv: a system for scripting interactive actors in virtual worlds. Computer Graphics 1996; 29(3).
7. Normand V, Babski C, Benford S, et al. The COVEN project: exploring applicative, technical and usage dimensions of collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1999; 8(2): 218-236.
8. Durlach N, Slater M. Presence in shared virtual environments and virtual togetherness. Presence 2000; 9: 214-217.
9. Blascovich J, Loomis JM, Beall AC, Swinth K, Hoyt C, Bailenson J. Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 13: 103-124.
10. Bailenson JN, Beall AC, Blascovich J, Weisbuch M, Raimmundo R. Intelligent agents who wear your face: users' reactions to the virtual self. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2001; no. 2190: 86-99.
11. Bailenson JN, Blascovich J, Beall AC, Loomis J. Equilibrium theory revisited: mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence 2001; 10: 583-597.
12. Kleinke CL. Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological Bulletin 1986; 100: 78-100.
13. Fry R, Smith GF. The effects of feedback and eye contact on performance of a digit-encoding task. Journal of Social Psychology 1975; 96: 145-146.
14. Caproni V, Levine D, O'Neal E, McDonald R, Garwood G. Seating position, instructor's eye contact availability, and student participation in a small seminar. Journal of Social Psychology 1977; 103: 315-316.
15. Jellison JM, Ickes WJ. The power of the glance: desire to see and be seen in cooperative and competitive situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1974; 10: 444-450.
16. Short J, Williams E, Christie B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Chichester: Wiley, 1976.
17. Kafer KL, Hunter M. On testing the face validity of planning/problem-solving tasks in a normal population. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1997; 3: 108-119.
18. Argyle M, Lalljee M, Cook M. The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad. Human Relations 1968; 21: 3-17.
19. Coburn RA, Cohen MF, Drucker SM. The role of eye gaze in avatar mediated conversational interfaces. Microsoft Research Technical Report, 2000.
20. Johnson WL, Rickel JW, Lester JC. Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 2000; 11: 47-78.