Time course of melody recognition: A gating paradigm study

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1019-1028

  Bella, Simone Dalla ^a,b   Peretz, Isabelle ^a   Aronoff, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348221973     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194831     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ALTMANN, G., WATHANASIN, S., BIRKETT, T., & RUSSELL, P. (1992). Experimenter program. Brighton, U.K.: University of Sussex, Network Analysis Ltd.
2. ATTNEAVE, F., & OLSON, R. K. (1971). Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 147-166.
3. BARTLETT, J. C., & DOWLING, W. J. (1980). Recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 501-515.
4. BERTHIER, J. E. (1979). 1000 chants [1,000 songs]. Paris: Presses de l'Ile-de-France.
5. BIGAND, E., & PARNCUTT, R. (1999). Perceiving musical tension in long chord sequences. Psychological Research, 62, 237-254.
6. BROWN, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 204-223.
7. COHEN, J., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
8. COTTON, S., & GROSJEAN, F. (1984). The gating paradigm: A comparison of successive and individual presentation formats. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 41-48.
9. DELIÈGE, I. (1987). Grouping conditions in listening to music: An approach to Lerdahl and Jackendoff's grouping preference rules. Music Perception, 4, 325-360.
10. DEUTSCH, D. (1972). Octave generalization and tune recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 411-412.
11. DOWLING, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341-354.
12. DOWLING, W. J. (1984). Musical experience and tonal scales in the recognition of octave-scrambled melodies. Psychomusicology, 4, 13-32.
13. DOWLING, W. J., & FUJITANI, D. S. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 524-531.
14. DOWLING, W. J., & HARWOOD, D. L. (1986). Music cognition. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15. DOWLING, W. J., & HOLLOMBE, A. W. (1977). The perception of melodies distorted by splitting into several octaves: Effects of increasing proximity and melodic contour. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 60-64.
16. FRAUENFELDER, U. H. (1996). Computational models of spoken word recognition. In T. Dijkstra & K. de Smedt (Eds.), Computational psycholinguistics: AI and connectionist models of human language processing. London: Taylor & Francis.
17. GROSJEAN, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
18. GROSJEAN, F. (1996). Gating. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604.
19. HALPERN, A. R., BARTLETT, J. C., & DOWLING, W. J. (1995). Aging and experience in the recognition of musical transpositions. Psychology & Aging, 10, 325-342.
20. HANDEL, S. (1989). Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. HÉBERT, S., & PERETZ, I. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners? Memory & Cognition, 25, 518-533.
22. IDSON, W. L., & MASSARO, D. W. (1978). A bidimensional model of pitch in the recognition of melodies. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 551-565.
23. JOHNSON, N. F., & PUGH, K. R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 240-346.
24. KALLMAN, H. J., & MASSARO, D. W. (1979). Tone chroma is functional in melody recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 32-36.
25. KORIAT, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
26. KORIAT, A., & LEVY-SADOT, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 34-53.
27. KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. KRUMHANSL, C. L., & SHEPARD, R. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 579-594.
29. LERDAHL, P., & JACKENDOFF, R. S. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
31. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & WELSH, A. (1978). Processing interactions during word-recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
32. NARMOUR, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. PALMER, C., & KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1987a). Independent temporal and pitch structures in determination of musical phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 116-126.
34. PALMER, C., & KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1987b). Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: Effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 505-518.
35. PERETZ, I. (1989). Clustering in music: An appraisal of task factors. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 157-178.
36. PERETZ, I., BABAÏ, M., LUSSIER, I., HÉBERT, S., & GAONON, L. (1995). Corpus d'extraits musicaux: Indices relatifs à la familiarité, à l'âge d'acquisition et aux évocations verbales. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 211-239.
37. PERETZ, I., GAGNON, L., & BOUCHARD, B. (1998). Music and emotion: Perceptual determinants, immediacy, and isolation after brain damage. Cognition, 68, 111-141.
38. PERETZ, I., GAUDREAU, D., & BONNEL, A.-M. (1998). Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 884-902.
39. PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F., TEKCAN, A. I., WAGNER, J. L., BAXTER, T. L., & SHAFFER, S. D. (1998). Name or hum that tune: Feeling of knowing for music. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1131-1137.
40. PROTOPAPAS, A. (1999). Connectionist modeling of speech perception. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 410-436.
41. SCHELLENBERG, E. G. (1996). Expectancy in melody: Tests of the implication-realization model. Cognition, 58, 75-125.
42. SCHELLENBERG, E. G., IVERSON, P., & MCKINNON, M. C. (1999). Name that tune: Identifying popular recordings from brief excerpts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 641-646.
43. SMITH, J. D. (1997). The place of musical novices in music science. Music Perception, 14, 227-262.
44. SMITH, J. D., NELSON, D. G., GROHSKOPF, L. A., & APPLETON, T. (1994). What child is this? What interval was that? Familiar tunes and music perception in novice listeners. Cognition, 52, 23-54.
45. TYLER, L. K. (1984). The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 417-427.
46. TYLER, L. K., & WESSELS, J. (1985). Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency data. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 217-222.
47. WALLEY, A. C., MICHELA, V. L., & WOOD, D. R. (1995). The gating paradigm: Effects of presentation format on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 343-351.
48. WHITE, B. W. (1960). Recognition of distorted melodies. American Journal of Psychology, 73, 100-107.