Microtensile bond strengths to caries-affected dentine treated with Carisolv®

Australian Dental Journal

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 110-114

  Burrow, M F ^a,c   Bokas, J ^a   Tanumiharja, M ^b   Tyas, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

^c School of Dental Science   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bond strength; Carisolv; Dentine bonding

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; AMINOBUTYRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CARIDEX; CARISOLV; GLASS IONOMER; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STRESS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TENSION;

EID: 0348147427     PISSN: 00450421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2003.tb00018.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Schutzbank SG, Galiani J, Goldman M, Clark RE. A comparison in vitro study of GK-101 and GK-101E in caries removal. J Dent Res 1978;57:861-864.
2. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method from chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Caries Res 1999;33:171-177.
3. Kuboki Y, Ohgushi K, Fusayama T. Collagen biochemistry of the two layers of carious dentin. J Dent Res 1977;56:1233-1237.
4. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res 2000;34:144-150.
5. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265-273.
6. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, et al. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 1995;74:1679-1688.
7. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Bond strengths of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2000;25:2-10.
8. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Interfacial morphology of three adhesive systems created in caries-affected dentin. Am J Dent (in press).
9. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Cimmino A, Tyas MJ. The evaluation of four conditioners for glass ionomer cements using field-emission scanning electron microscopy. J Dent 2001;29:131-138.
10. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dental Mater 1998;14:212-221.
11. Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Mokrys K, Kaup M, Ott KHR. Reaction of sound and demineralized dentine to Carisolv in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 2002;30:59-65.
12. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall GW, Goto G. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent 2001;29:163-171.
13. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ. Does chemomechanical caries removal affect dentine adhesion? Euro J Oral Sci 2000;108:449-455.
14. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentin using four conditioners. J Dent 2000;28:361-366.
15. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dental Mater 2000;16:180-187.
16. Sakoolnamarka R. The influence of physico-chemical properties of dentine on bonding. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, 2001. PhD thesis.
17. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Kubo S, Tyas MJ. Morphological study of demineralized dentine after caries removal using two different methods. Aust Dent J 2002;47:116-122.
18. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and it acceptance by patients. Caries Res 2001;35:205-210.