Irritancy ranking of anionic detergents using one-time occlusive, repeated occlusive and repeated open tests

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 316-322

  Tupker, R A ^a,c   Bunte, E E ^a   Fidler, V ^d   Wiechers, J W ^b   Coenraads, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Uniqema   (Netherlands)

^c ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Detergents; Irritancy; One time patch test; Prediction; Rank order; Repeated occlusive test; Repeated open test; Sodium lauryl sulfate; Transepidermal water loss

Indexed keywords

DETERGENT; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; ISETHIONIC ACID; SOAP; SUCCINIC ACID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCLUSION; PATCH TEST; RATING SCALE; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN WATER LOSS;

EID: 0032980327     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06082.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. 1. Tupker R A, Willis C, Berardesca E, Lee C H, Fartasch M, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) exposure tests. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 53-69.
2. 2. Smeenk G. The influence of detergents on the skin (a clinical and biochemical study). Arch Klin Exp Dermatol 1969: 235: 180-191.
3. 3. Imokawa G, Mishima Y. Cumulative effect of surfactants on cutaneous horny layers: adsorption onto human keratin layers in vivo. Contact Dermatitis 1979: 5: 357-366.
4. 4. Frosch P J. Irritancy of soaps and detergent bars. In: Frost P, Horwitz S N (eds): Principles of cosmetics for the dermatologist. St. Louis: CV Mosby Company, 1982: 5-12.
5. 5. Hannuksela A, Hannuksela M. Irritant effects of a detergent in wash, chamber and repeated open application tests. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 134-137.
6. 6. Pinnagoda J, Tupker R A, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the standardization group of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Society. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 164-178.
7. 7. Patrick E, Maibach H I. Predictive skin irritation tests in animals and humans. Human tests for predicting irritation. In: Marzulli F N, Maibach H I (eds): Dermatotoxicology, 4th edition. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1991: 209-215.
8. 8. Tupker R A, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads P J, Nater J P. The influence of repeated exposure to surfactants on the human skin as determined by transepidermal water loss and visual scoring. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 108-114.
9. 9. Bettley F R. The irritant effect of detergents. Trans St Johns Hospital Derm Soc 1972: 58: 65-74.
10. 10. Fartasch M. Human barrier formation and reaction to irritation. In: Burg G (ed): Curr Probl Dermatol: Irritant dermatitis: New clinical and experimental aspects. Basel: Karger Verlag, 1995: 95-103.
11. 11. Willis C M, Stephens C J M, Wilkinson J D. Selective expression of immune-associated surface antigens by keratinocytes in irritant contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 1991: 96: 505-511.
12. 12. Tupker R A, Vermeulen K, Fidler V, Coenraads PJ. Irritancy testing of sodium laurate and other anionic detergents using an open exposure model. Skin Res Technol 1997: 3: 133-136.
13. 13. De Groot A C, Weyland J W, Nater J P. Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology, 3rd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994: 536-538.
14. 14. Wigger-Alberti W, Hinnen U, Elsner P. Predictive testing of metalworking fluids: a comparison of 2 cumulative human irritation models and correlation with epidemiological data. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 36: 14-20.