Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 569-589

  Stins, John F ^a   Michaels, Claire F ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0348080737     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755894     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adam, J.J., Paas, F.G.W.C., Buekers, M.J., Wuyts, I.J., Spijkers, W.A.C., & Wallmeyer, P. (1996). Perception-action coupling in choice reaction time tasks. Human Movement Science, 15, 511-519.
2. Bernstein, N.A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movement. London: Pergamon.
3. Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J.D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
4. Georgopoulos, A.P., Lurito, J.T., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A.B., & Massey, J.T. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243, 234-236.
5. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N.W.A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.
6. Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P., & Ehrenstein, W.H. (1990). Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R.W. Proctor & T.G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 117-143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7. Hendrikx, A.J.P. (1986). Compatibility of precueing and of S-R mapping in choice reactions. Acta Psychologica, 62, 59-88.
8. Hommel, B. (1993a). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
9. Hommel, B. (1993b). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 202-222.
10. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. Kornblum, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G.E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 743-777). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
13. Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1992). Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 79, 115-130.
14. Michaels, C.F. (1989). S-R compatibilities depend on eccentricity of responding hand. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 263-272.
15. Michaels, C.F., & Schilder, S. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: The effects of hand position and posture. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 342-348.
16. Michaels, C.F., & Stins, J.F. (1997). An ecological approach to S-R compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 333-360). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. Morasso, P. (1981). Spatial control of arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 42, 223-227.
18. Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G.P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1982). Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 664-673.
19. Proctor, R.W., & Reeve, T.G. (Eds.). (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. Proctor, R.W., Van Zandt, T, Lu, C-H., & Weeks, D.J. (1993). Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: Perception or affordances of directional coding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 81-91.
21. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40.
22. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B.M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 231-265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Rosenbaum, DA., Marchak, F., Barnes, H.J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J.D., & Jorgensen, M.J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grip. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Roswarski, T.E., & Proctor, R.W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research, 59, 196-211.
25. Spijkers, W.A.C., Wallmeyer, P., Adam, J.J., Paas, F.G.W.C., Buekers, M.J., & Wuyts, I.J. (1996). Spatial compatibility of signal-response position in pointing. Psychological Research, 59, 107-118.
26. Stins, J.F., & Michaels, C.F. (1997a). Stimulus-response compatibility is information-action compatibility. Ecological Psychology, 9, 25-45.
27. Stins, J.F., & Michaels, C.F. (1997b). Stimulus-target compatibility for reaching movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 756-767.
28. Stoffer, T.H. (1991). Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127-135.
29. Stoffer, T.H., & Umiltà, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 181-208). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
30. Tipper, S.P., Howard, L. A., & Jackson, S.R. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference. Visual Cognition, 4, 1-38.
31. Tipper, S.P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G.C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
32. Umiltà, C., & Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81-90.
33. Weeks, D.J., Proctor, R.W., & Beyak, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: Evidence for spatial coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 367-383.