Alaris AEP™ Monitor's "Click Detection" Does Not Help to Detect Inadvertent Disconnection of Headphones during Anesthesia

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 123-127

  Schmidt, Gunter N ^a   Bischoff, Petra ^a   Standl, Thomas ^a   Gerhardt, Andreas ^a   Lankenau, Gunnar ^a   Schulte, Jochen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; ROCURONIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; DOSE RESPONSE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANK SUM TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 0347993844     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093230.15342.9C     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Doi M, Gajraj RJ, Mantzarídis, Kenny GNC. Relationship between calculated blood concentration of propofol and electrophysiological variables during emergence from anesthesia: comparison of bispectral index, spectral edge frequency, median frequency and auditory evoked potential index. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:180-4.
2. Iselin-Chaves IA, El Moalem HE, Gan TJ, et al. Changes in the auditory evoked potentials and the bispectral index following propofol or propofol and alfentanil. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1300-10.
3. Jensen EW, Lindholm P, Hermeberg S. Autoregressive modeling with exogenous input of middle-latency auditory-evoked potentials to measure rapid changes in depth of anesthesia. Methods Inf Med 1996;35:256-60.
4. Litvan H, Jensen EW, Revuelta M, et al. Comparison of auditory evoked potentials and the A-line ARX Index for monitoring the hypnotic level during sevoflurane and propofol induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:245-51.
5. Litvan H, Jensen EW, Galan J, et al. Comparison of conventional averaged and rapid averaged, autoregressive-based extracted auditory evoked potentials for monitoring the hypnotic level during propofol induction. Anesthesiology 2002;97:351-7.
6. Struys MM, Jensen EW, Smith W, et al, Performance of the ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index as an indicator of anesthetic depth: a comparison with bispectral index and hemodynamic measures during propofol administration. Anesthesiology 2002;96:803-16.
7. Ge SJ, Zhuang XL, Wang YT, et al. Changes in the rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials index and the bispectral index during sedation induced by propofol or midazolam under epidural block. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:260-4.
8. Alpiger S, Helbo-Hansen HS, Jensen EW. Effect of sevoflurane on the mid-latency auditory evoked potentials measured by a new fast extracting monitor. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:252-6.
9. Buettner UW, Drost E. Akustisch evozierte Potentiale mittlerer Latenz. Z EEG-EMG 1985;16:145-7.
10. Thornton C, Newton D. The auditory evoked response: a measurement of depth of anaesthesia? Ballieres Clin Anaesth 1989;3:559-85.
11. Katoh T, Suzuki A, Ikeda K. Electroencephalographic derivatives as a tool for predicting the depth of sedation and anesthesia induced by sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 1998;88:642-50.
12. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998;89:980-1002.