Bayesian Trio Models for Association in the Presence of Genotyping Errors

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 70-80

  Bernardinelli, L ^a,b   Berzuini, C ^a,b   Seaman, S ^a   Holmans, P ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Association; Bayesian; Genotyping error; MCMC; Relative risk

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; FAMILY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC RISK; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MODEL; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; BAYES THEOREM; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NUCLEAR FAMILY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 0347992873     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10291     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chiano MN, Clayton DG. 1998. Genotypic relative risk under ordered restriction. Genet Epidemiol 15:135-146.
2. Clayton D. 1999. A generalization of the transmission/disequilibrium test for uncertain-haplotype transmission. Am J Hum Genet 65:1170-1177.
3. Daw EW, Kumm J, Snow GL, Thompson EA, Wijsman EM. 1999. Monte Carlo Markov chain methods for genome screening. Genet Epidemiol 17(Suppl 1):S133-S138.
4. Devlin B, Roeder K, Wasserman L. 2001. Genomic control: a new approach to genetic-based association studies. Theor Popul Biol 60:155-166.
5. Douglas JA, Skol AD, Boehnke M. 2002. Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data. Am J Hum Genet 70:487-495.
6. Falk CT, Rubinstein P. 1987. Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 51:227-233.
7. Gauderman WJ. 2002a. Sample size requirements for association studies of gene-gene interaction. Am J Epidemiol 155:478-484.
8. Gauderman WJ. 2002b. Sample size requirements for matched case-control studies of gene-environment interaction. Stat Med 21:35-50.
9. Gelman A, Meng X-L. 1996. Model checking and model improvement. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice, London: Chapman and Hall. p 189-201.
10. George V, Laud PW. 2002. A Bayesian approach to the transmission/disequilibrium test for binary traits. Genet Epidemiol 22:41-51.
11. Gordon D, Ott J. 2001. Assessment and management of single-nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis. Pac Symp Biocomput 2001:18-29.
12. Gordon D, Heath SC, Ott J. 1999a. True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered 49:65-70.
13. Gordon D, Matise TC, Heath SC, Ott J. 1999b. Power loss for multiallelic transmission disequilibrium test when errors introduced: GAW11 simulated data. Genet Epidemiol 17(Suppl 1):S587-S592.
14. Gordon D, Heath SC, Liu X, Ott J. 2001. A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Am J Hum Genet 60:371-380.
15. Heath SC, Snow GL, Thompson EA, Tseng C, Wijsman EM. 1997. MCMC segregation and linkage analysis. Genet Epidemiol 14:1011-1016.
16. Heath SC. 1998. A bias in TDT due to undetected genotyping errors. Am J Hum Genet 66:1310-1327.
17. Lauritzen SL. 1996. Graphical models. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Meade TW, Mellows S, Brozovic M, Miller GJ, Chakrabarti RR, North WR, Haines AP, Stirling Y, Imeson JD, Thompson SG. 1986. Lancet 2 8506:533-537.
19. Mitchell AA, Cutler DJ, Chakravarti A. 2003. Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 72:598-610.
20. Ott J. 1977. Linkage analysis with misclassification at one locus. Clin Gen 12:110-124.
21. Rice KM, Holmans P. 2003. Allowing for genotyping error in analysis of unmatched case-control studies. Ann Hum Genet 65:167-174.
22. Schaid DJ. 1996. General score tests for association of genetic markers with disease using cases and their parents. Genet Epidemiol 13:423-449.
23. Schaid DJ, Sommer SS. 1993. Genotype relative risks: methods for design and analysis of candidate-gene association studies. Am J Hum Genet 53:1114-1126.
24. Schaid DJ, Sommer SS. 1994. Comparison of statistics for candidate-gene association studies using cases and parents. Am J Hum Genet 55:402-409.
25. Schwab SG, Knapp M, Mondabon S, Hallmayer J, Borrmann-Hassenbach M, et al. 2003. Support for association of schizophrenia with genetic variation in the 6p22.3 gene, dysbindin, in sib-pair families with linkage and in an additional sample of triad families. Am J Hum Genet 72:185-190.
26. Self SG, Longton G, Kopecky KJ, Liang KY. 1991. On estimating HLA-disease association with application to a study of aplastic anemia. Biometrics 47:53-61.
27. Sobel E, Papp JC, Lange K. 2002. Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics. Am J Hum Genet 70:496-508.
28. Spiegelhalter, DJ, Thomas A, Best NG. 1996. Computation on Bayesian graphical models, Bayesian Stat 5:407-425.
29. Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best NG. 1999. WinBUGS Version 1.2 User Manual. Cambridge, UK. MRC Biostatistics Unit.
30. Spielman RS, McGinnis, Ewens WJ. 1993. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52:506-516.
31. Terwilliger JD, Ott J. 1992. A haplotype-based 'haplotype relative risk' approach to detecting allelic associations. Hum Hered 42:337-346.
32. Terwilliger JD, Weeks DE, Ott J. 1990. Laboratory errors in the reading of marker allele causes massive reduction in lod score and lead to gross overestimates of the recombination fraction. Am J Hum Genet (Suppl) 47:A201.
33. Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. 1998. A log-linear approach to case-parent-triad data: assessing effects of disease genes that act either directly or through maternal effects and that may be subject to parental imprinting. Am J Hum Genet 62:969-978.
34. Weinberg CR. 1999. Methods for detection of parent-of-origin effects in genetic studies of case-parents triads. Am J Hum Genet 65:229-235.
35. Whittaker JC, Morris AP. 2001. Family-based tests of association and/or linkage. Am J Hum Genet 65:407-419.